|
Page 2 of 3 |
|
Prev |
1 2
3
|
Next
Re: Found a glitch in Maemo 5's terminal...strange characters
Quote:
|
Re: Found a glitch in Maemo 5's terminal...strange characters
Quote:
and wait ... and if you have no luser at disposal for that you can allway ask john to find something in it. |
Re: Found a glitch in Maemo 5's terminal...strange characters
No, no no. Pipe /dev/urandom into the midi synth!
Admittedly, you'd probably have to make a converter that converts 8 or 16 bit chunks to midi-compatible symbols, but I bet it'd sound awesome! |
Re: Found a glitch in Maemo 5's terminal...strange characters
aplay /dev/urandom
for some cool white noise to lull you to sleep. Or maybe not. |
Re: Found a glitch in Maemo 5's terminal...strange characters
Quote:
|
Re: Found a glitch in Maemo 5's terminal...strange characters
Quote:
|
Re: Found a glitch in Maemo 5's terminal...strange characters
Quote:
e: or even first ever fully distortion-less full detail photo of a yeti ;) |
Re: Found a glitch in Maemo 5's terminal...strange characters
Quote:
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p=870876&postcount=8 if you give such a output to a wide public you can be sure that all the folks try to make some sense out of it and at least one comes up with a theory about its meaning. its not the monkey who types something but the human who tries to make some sense out of it, .... well boils down to 42 in the end ... |
Re: Found a glitch in Maemo 5's terminal...strange characters
Quote:
|
Re: Found a glitch in Maemo 5's terminal...strange characters
actually i do argue against that.
see maths is /full/ of errors and many are connected with infinity. infinity is something humans can't grasp and have no way of proofing what happens when it comes to infinity. you would have to stop beeing human and become something godlike standing above the system to describe it. and thats been prooven: that we cannot proove it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halting_problem and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6...eness_theorems what they do now is still calucalate on theories based on more fundamental theories that have been prooven wrong. it's a funny assumption they make that with infinite tries every possibility neccessarily occurs if they all have the same probability. actually i do not think that every possible combination will occur by only giving freedom of infinite combinations. you would need something that ensures that /all/ possibilities /have/ to occur. there is no such restriction so some may never occur: we have that possibillity too. still there is a high probability that something that makes sense comes out with random symbol combinations. for that you do not need infinite tries. you only need a brain that associates symbols with something. my 2c Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 20:21. |
Page 2 of 3 |
|
Prev |
1 2
3
|
Next
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8