| Prev |   6     7   8   9   | Next
maemo.org - Talk
Page 8 of 9
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Maemo 5 / Fremantle (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=40)
-   -   N900 kernel v45, why with uboot??? (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=65644)

Erazor 2010-11-17 15:06
Re: N900 kernel v45, why with uboot???
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SubCore (Post 876119)
good to know that it works now, although i'd rather try to determine why the FLAC symlink is incorrect or doesn't work instead of just copying the file... i still have that symlink and never had a problem...
anyhow, just remember that your rootfs just grew by 300 kB ;)
whats 300kb instead of no music :D

Fabry 2010-11-17 15:16
Re: N900 kernel v45, why with uboot???
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erazor (Post 876081)
yes i read this.

can you make a step by step tutorial to uninstall uboot and install
nolo again?
Nolo is always present, noone remove it.

The sequence is :

- nolo starts u-boot thinking it is a kernel
- u-boot starts real kernel

To remove u-boot you must only flash a kernel image without u-boot enclosed

Erazor 2010-11-17 15:22
Re: N900 kernel v45, why with uboot???
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabry (Post 876145)
Nolo is always present, noone remove it.

The sequence is :

- nolo starts u-boot thinking it is a kernel
- u-boot starts real kernel

To remove u-boot you must only flash a kernel image without u-boot enclosed

im fine with uboot :)
i only thought the problem was uboot ;)

but it seems thats a PR1.3 Bug ;)

so nothing to blame on kernel-power


Greetz
Erazor

Fabry 2010-11-17 15:51
Re: N900 kernel v45, why with uboot???
 
Step by step guide: http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=65776

Erazor 2010-11-17 16:01
Re: N900 kernel v45, why with uboot???
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabry (Post 876170)
thx 4 that :)

geneven 2010-11-18 16:16
Re: N900 kernel v45, why with uboot???
 
Kernel 46 uboot is either gone or improved.

I saw no sign of it with the keyboard closed on boot, but with it open I could back up. Anyway, to me it seems better, faster, and nicer.

Note: for some reason Faster Application Manager didn't show me the kernel update option, but the original Application Manager did.

adhrie 2010-11-18 16:25
Re: N900 kernel v45, why with uboot???
 
power kernel v46 uboot disabled

according to changelogs at https://garage.maemo.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=6570

richwhite 2010-11-18 16:47
Re: N900 kernel v45, why with uboot???
 
There's a bunch of threads on the kernels that are too long to read all the way through, so at the risk of going slightly OT, i'm on v42 and i have only used the kernels for OCing. Am i missing other features that i should be looking into?

lunat 2010-11-18 16:49
Re: N900 kernel v45, why with uboot???
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by geneven (Post 877183)
Kernel 46 uboot is either gone or improved.

Note: for some reason Faster Application Manager didn't show me the kernel update option, but the original Application Manager did.
normal. for that reason i say: don't use fam and don't use apt-get from the shell. hildon/ham is the troublemaker but that does not matter it results in that only ham works sane ....
i did mention it - didn't i?

adhrie 2010-11-18 17:00
Re: N900 kernel v45, why with uboot???
 
i updated from fapman, showed v46 after updating catalogs and then press upgrade

@richwhite : if you use power kernel 'only' for overclocking purpose, you should stick with version 42, prominent new feature in the next versions is related with usb hostmode support & uboot integration (except for v46)


| Prev |   6     7   8   9   | Next
All times are GMT. The time now is 19:08.
Page 8 of 9
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8