maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   General (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it? (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=67724)

gerbick 2011-01-11 20:28

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
The argument against dual core cpus for the next Nokia released phone is that MeeGo isn't optimized for it.

mikecomputing 2011-01-11 20:31

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by wmarone (Post 917444)
I think the OpenMoko devices were fully open, even the GSM stack. Sure they weren't great or current in terms of connectivity, but they were open.

That said, for all of Nokia's rhetoric about open source they dropped the ball with Maemo. Better and more familiar than other vendors at the time, but nowhere near what was necessary to match their speech. MeeGo is essentially what Maemo should have been in terms of openness, and I hope they follow through on at least letting stock meego users have full hardware support.

Yeah and OpenMoko was a succes? No! Did it work for everyday use? No!

And as I said before, I guess many of us who still beleive in Meego will be a bit dissapointed especially those who believe it will be fully open sourced and at the same time fully working for everyday use.

Some can dream but I am a realist.

If meego shall succes it need "payed developers" and some payed developers does'nt want to be fully open source. And trust me those is also needed. Some developers is scared for open source model too. Especialy those developers or softwarecompanys that has worked in closed projects all theyr life... The same goes for SoC manufactors (who often has closed drivers for GFX etc..) like Texas vs Intel vs Samsung etc...

wmarone 2011-01-11 20:33

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gerbick (Post 918149)
MeeGo isn't optimized for it.

By that logic, Ubuntu and Redhat aren't either.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikecomputing (Post 918153)
Yeah and OpenMoko was a succes? No! Did it work for everyday use? No!

Did I say it was? I was citing an example of something that was fully open.

Quote:

And as I said before, I guess many of us who still beleive in Meego will be a bit dissapointed especially those who believe it will be fully open sourced and at the same time fully working for everyday use

Some can dream but I am a realist.
You won't get the GSM stack, some device-specific firmware or a handful of driver bits (probably video,) but MeeGo as an OS is already more open than Maemo was. As I understand it, everything necessary to make MeeGo on the N900 fully functional is already available, it just needs to be hooked up, which is what Stskeeps and his team are doing every day.

Quote:

If meego shall succes it need "payed developers" and some payed developers does'nt want to be fully open source.
It already has paid developers working on it, and everything they do with MeeGo is open source. Vendor specific stuff is not part of MeeGo, and that is what will most likely be closed.

mikecomputing 2011-01-11 20:37

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gerbick (Post 918149)
The argument against dual core cpus for the next Nokia released phone is that MeeGo isn't optimized for it.

I guess this also are true for Android. But the companys still release HW based on it to make it LOOK like it is not the case...

mikecomputing 2011-01-11 20:42

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 

You won't get the GSM stack, some device-specific firmware or a handful of driver bits (probably video,) but MeeGo as an OS is already more open than Maemo was. As I understand it, everything necessary to make MeeGo on the N900 fully functional is already available, it just needs to be hooked up, which is what Stskeeps and his team are doing every day.


Hmm gfx driver is closed if I remember it correct. Also the BMI stuff. But it great to see that Nokie employers helped to make that work.

It already has paid developers working on it, and everything they do with MeeGo is open source. Vendor specific stuff is not part of MeeGo, and that is what will most likely be closed.[/QUOTE]

Yes and I dont see this as bad.

Maybe I did understand you at the begining my point was just that some will start bash like hell when they realise that non HW based on Meego will be fully open source. I guess the meegoforum will be as full at this forum with whining and bashing about it ;)

slender 2011-01-11 20:45

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
I just want longer battery run time and optimized HW and SW on power consumption and speed aspects. Average CPU and GPU power is just enough. Just sweet spot on cpu&gpu / battery consumption / price variables.

@mikecomputing
Don´t you get it? Meego is open. This is fact. Now repeat that n+1 times. I would at least expect that all UI code is closed on Nokias own version of OS that is based on Meego.

mikecomputing 2011-01-11 20:53

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by slender (Post 918162)
I just want longer battery run time and optimized HW and SW on power consumption and speed aspects. Average CPU and GPU power is just enough. Just sweet spot on cpu&gpu / battery consumption / price variables.

@mikecomputing
Don´t you get it? Meego is open. This is fact. Now repeat that n+1 times. I would at least expect that all UI code is closed on Nokias own version of OS that is based on Meego.

Yes Meego CORE is open but I havent seen any HW based on Meego soo far where everything is open source! Drivers now you repeat n+1 times?

If you can show me fully working handset or tablet that is fully opensource and working for everyday use then I will beleive it noit before...

slender 2011-01-11 20:57

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
@mikecomputing
btw. Learn to use quotes.

slender 2011-01-11 20:59

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
@mikecomputing.
This is at least something:
http://pandaboard.org/

gerbick 2011-01-11 21:06

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by wmarone (Post 918154)
By that logic, Ubuntu and Redhat aren't either.

But neither are being used for a phone, not directly.

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikecomputing
I guess this also are true for Android. But the companys still release HW based on it to make it LOOK like it is not the case...

But more work has been done in getting Android to utilize multiple cores. We've yet to see MeeGo finalized.

The point I was making was not from a logical standpoint of what we'd like, but moreso what Nokia would probably say in not releasing multiple core phone.

To be honest, going from a 600mhz A8 to 1.2ghz dual core A9 is very unlikely for Nokia.

danramos 2011-01-11 21:10

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mikecomputing (Post 918125)
[QUOTE=danramos;917443]Then why did they DECREASE the openness as they went along, if they're so committed to open-source? Why commission a closed-source calendar application for an open-source operating system? Why prefer closed-source reliant hardware when there are more open-source friendlier ones? "

Again show me an example of an fully open source hardware on handset market!? OI havent even seen any fully open source drivers on PC market(Example: closed wifi/gfx drivers is some...).

Do you mean they should use an open source based calendar? DO they work with fully sync for OVi/IMAP whatever crap sokme needs? If they decided to go fully open calendar then even more people should startr bashing about halfdone stuff.

Another example is flash everyone is bashing about Flash 9 instead of Flash 10 is that component open!? Not a chance! Is there an open replacement that works. I can say no. So again not everything can be fully open.

" Maybe that one I could concede on a little and forgive some hardware drivers, but closed-source applications and forcing a dependency on them? Why the puffery about open-source at all, if you're going to just create a hard dependency on closed-source applications that you can't remove like the calendar, media player, etc.? Credit where it's due--at least they FINALLY did open up the camera drivers--but that still leaves an INCREDIBLY large amount of dependencies and closed-source to contend with."

Why can the calendar be removed? :-S Where did u get that from?


"By contrast, if I run CyanogenMod (without the Google Apps, I
might add) on my Droid--I have a firmware image constantly updated by the community all on its own with almost complete open-source and very, VERY little closed-source at all and no dependency on closed source except for the drivers and Dalvik."


Exactly the same for N900 then. = PowerKernel with USBHostmode, fcam instead of old camera driver, open source wifi driver etc...

I kinda wish I could have a discussion with you, but I can barely tell the difference between what you're quoting from me and what you're answering back. It looks like a big staticy mess of noise whenever you try to answer. As someone previously said, learn to use quotes. I'm not bothering to read through to respond to this mess.

mattbutsko 2011-01-11 21:19

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Sure. If nokia only had released n9 last year. We would be here in this thread right now. Don't blame me. Please call OPK and tell him that.
This thread is obnoxiously long because Nokia failed to meet a deadline? Not really.

somedude 2011-01-11 21:27

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mattbutsko (Post 918189)
This thread is obnoxiously long because Nokia failed to meet a deadline? Not really.

this is how we kill time here.
look for the threads when-ever nokia took preorders and extended the shipping dates for n900.

Dave999 2011-01-11 21:28

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mattbutsko (Post 918189)
This thread is obnoxiously long because Nokia failed to meet a deadline? Not really.

nokia have no offical deadline for the N9. (If you don't use Elop's words as a deadline ;))

So you might be right.

danramos 2011-01-11 21:33

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mattbutsko (Post 918189)
This thread is obnoxiously long because Nokia failed to meet a deadline? Not really.

No, it's long because we're all quoting your message to respond to it. :)

mattbutsko 2011-01-11 23:12

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danramos (Post 918200)
No, it's long because we're all quoting your message to respond to it. :)

Funny. I was actually reading the passed few pages, you've got some good points.

Funny too how in so many forums so many people will completely spin off topic and carry on with it for pages and pages and pages.

By the way, I never meant that I wanted this thread to stop, I was just mentioning the original poster's question/statement-thing has been answered.


Edit: the tags are hilarious.

mikecomputing 2011-01-11 23:58

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by slender (Post 918171)
@mikecomputing.
This is at least something:
http://pandaboard.org/

last time I checked the gfx driver was not opensource...

danramos 2011-01-12 00:54

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mattbutsko (Post 918261)
Funny. I was actually reading the passed few pages, you've got some good points.

Funny too how in so many forums so many people will completely spin off topic and carry on with it for pages and pages and pages.

By the way, I never meant that I wanted this thread to stop, I was just mentioning the original poster's question/statement-thing has been answered.


Edit: the tags are hilarious.

Not complaining--I just thought it was funny that everybody for the last few posts were quoting the same original message you wrote. :)

...and you're welcome for the tags. ;)

Dave999 2011-01-12 10:01

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
353 days left of 2011. in case anyone missed that.

I'm also trying to keep my hopes high for the meeting in barcelona. Just a comment about meego progress or N9 would be enough.

danramos 2011-01-12 19:09

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Maybe they'll have a big all-day conference about Symbian and then at the end, a quick mention that the N9 is "kinda neat"and that you'll love it when you see it. Mysteriously, the announcer will twirl in place in a cloud of smoke and disappear.

Dave999 2011-01-12 19:36

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Didn't Intel/Nokia announce Meego last year at MWC...what have happened since then?

ohh yes...progress!

http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/wp-...1/VM_Meego.jpg

Dave999 2011-01-12 22:14

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Meego progress continues, Waiting continues. 352 days to go...

danramos 2011-01-12 23:39

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave999 (Post 919068)
Meego progress continues, Waiting continues. 352 days to go...

0% [....\........................] 100%

Still loading?? GAH!

mikecomputing 2011-01-12 23:55

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave999 (Post 918945)
Didn't Intel/Nokia announce Meego last year at MWC...what have happened since then?

ohh yes...progress!

http://www.visionmobile.com/blog/wp-...1/VM_Meego.jpg

If you really are intested here are some tips what has happened since then:

http://wiki.meego.com
http://qa-reports.meego.com/

several mailiinglists with info
also irc channels at freenet

but most activitys is probadly:

http://meego.gitorious.org/

attila77 2011-01-13 00:07

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gerbick (Post 918177)
But neither are being used for a phone, not directly.

But more work has been done in getting Android to utilize multiple cores. We've yet to see MeeGo finalized.

How do you quantify this "more work" ? I find it amusing to claim than on a phone, multicore somehow works differently, and that a full Linux and Qt, both multithreaded and asynchronous for decades, are somehow not optimized for multicore operations. Unless you meant "more work *needs* to be done" in Android to utilize multiple cores.

danramos 2011-01-13 00:19

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by attila77 (Post 919146)
How do you quantify this "more work" ? I find it amusing to claim than on a phone, multicore somehow works differently, and that a full Linux and Qt, both multithreaded and asynchronous for decades, are somehow not optimized for multicore operations. Unless you meant "more work *needs* to be done" in Android to utilize multiple cores.

This is boggling. I thought there was talk about how Android was a natural for multi-core, what with its virtual machine architecture. (i.e. http://blog.alsutton.com/2010/12/30/...e-android-101/)

attila77 2011-01-13 10:57

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by danramos (Post 919157)
This is boggling. I thought there was talk about how Android was a natural for multi-core, what with its virtual machine architecture. (i.e. http://blog.alsutton.com/2010/12/30/...e-android-101/)

What I was referring to was:
Quote:

the OS will distribute the tasks accordingly, but, if you don’t split your application up, Android probably won’t know it can split the tasks across the available cores and so your application won’t make the best use of the resources available.
Qt is *by default* asynchronous in most use-cases, with a very strict focus on thread-safe/reentrant functions. It actually takes effort and proactive bad programming to end up with something that does not take advantage of multiple cores, and that is even true for applications already existing on the N900. Yes, if there was a multi-core Maemo5 device, the existing Qt apps would automatically get a degree of multi-core sweetness. That's why I find it funny when I hear doubts that MeeGo will somehow be inferior in that regard.

gerbick 2011-01-14 14:02

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Never said it was inferior. MeeGo just isn't out yet. It needs to be out for me to say anything about how it is either better, worse or compares to anything else out there.

Wiki page links and statements mean very little without your own experience of the final version of the OS on final hardware.

Dave999 2011-01-14 18:01

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Lucky for me I can't find a n9 on market today. Just can't afford it today. Might have the money tomorrow. 351 days of money hunting...

nilchak 2011-01-14 18:07

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
So if Meego 1.2 isnt going to be ready till April, why are some sites reporting that Nokia N9 (with Meeho I presume) will be announced in Feb at MWC ? Hard logic to follow - unless of course its back to Nokia's old Announce-Release cycle where there is a period of 6 months between the two. If that is the case then who cares.

Otherwise I dont see how Nokia can release a Meego device with a complete Meego stack and its own proprietary components when Meego itself will not be ready.

The old N9 hardware photo though still loOks very nice. Compare that to all the generic looking phoNes bought out by Samsung/HTC. Particlularly the Android phones all look similar in shape (rounded corner rectangular slab) with same looking 4 hardware or software buttons at the bottom. I understand the phones might have different internals (like the Atric) but externally they look the same (and a bit boring now).

Dave999 2011-01-14 18:30

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nilchak (Post 920373)
So if Meego 1.2 isnt going to be ready till April, why are some sites reporting that Nokia N9 (with Meeho I presume) will be announced in Feb at MWC ? Hard logic to follow - unless of course its back to Nokia's old Announce-Release cycle where there is a period of 6 months between the two. If that is the case then who cares.

Otherwise I dont see how Nokia can release a Meego device with a complete Meego stack and its own proprietary components when Meego itself will not be ready.

The old N9 hardware photo though still loOks very nice. Compare that to all the generic looking phoNes bought out by Samsung/HTC. Particlularly the Android phones all look similar in shape (rounded corner rectangular slab) with same looking 4 hardware or software buttons at the bottom. I understand the phones might have different internals (like the Atric) but externally they look the same (and a bit boring now).

1. The sites are wrong.
x. N9 announced but have to wait months or years before it hit the stores.
2. Nokia release a meego hybrid(half meego, Maemo 6)

tissot 2011-01-14 18:49

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nilchak (Post 920373)
So if Meego 1.2 isnt going to be ready till April, why are some sites reporting that Nokia N9 (with Meeho I presume) will be announced in Feb at MWC ? Hard logic to follow - unless of course its back to Nokia's old Announce-Release cycle where there is a period of 6 months between the two. If that is the case then who cares.


Because "nobody" knows about harmattan/Maemo 6 and Nokia for sure isn't marketing that name.

Will N9 ship with MeeGo-Harmattan or pure MeeGo? I tend to think that it will ship with MeeGo-Harmattan where Nokia has gone so far as they can to make it as compatible as they can to pure MeeGo, do i really know, no. :D

Major blogs have no idea about all this and i have not seen any of them mentioning harmattan, not saying they should know though.

attila77 2011-01-14 19:18

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gerbick (Post 920219)
Never said it was inferior. MeeGo just isn't out yet. It needs to be out for me to say anything about how it is either better, worse or compares to anything else out there.

You sure 'bout that ?

Quote:

Originally Posted by gerbick (Post 918149)
The argument against dual core cpus for the next Nokia released phone is that MeeGo isn't optimized for it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gerbick (Post 918177)
But more work has been done in getting Android to utilize multiple cores.

Anyway, MeeGo actually has far more public multicore hardware than Android, it's just that you need to take the Nokia glasses off. There is the myriad of dual-core atom systems, from ARM side there is the Pandaboard, and, yes, even Tegra2 builds exist. Also, Honeycomb and Xoom et al are not released yet.

And, the usual - there is no such thing as a "final version of MeeGo" - there are only releases. There was a 1.0 release, a 1.1, a 1.2, there will be a 1.3, etc. Calling any of them final or even 'ready' is misleading at best (you will not see any version on retail products of major vendors anyway without the appropriate level of customization and optimization).

olighak 2011-01-14 23:20

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nilchak (Post 920373)
So if Meego 1.2 isnt going to be ready till April, why are some sites reporting that Nokia N9 (with Meeho I presume) will be announced in Feb at MWC ? Hard logic to follow - unless of course its back to Nokia's old Announce-Release cycle where there is a period of 6 months between the two. If that is the case then who cares.

Otherwise I dont see how Nokia can release a Meego device with a complete Meego stack and its own proprietary components when Meego itself will not be ready.

The old N9 hardware photo though still loOks very nice. Compare that to all the generic looking phoNes bought out by Samsung/HTC. Particlularly the Android phones all look similar in shape (rounded corner rectangular slab) with same looking 4 hardware or software buttons at the bottom. I understand the phones might have different internals (like the Atric) but externally they look the same (and a bit boring now).

Man I dislike, dislike, dislike Motorola..................but the facts that it´s not their own mangled operating system, but Android, and that the Atrix will be able to do what I hoped my next device after the N95, the N900, could do but can´t, means that I´m very very tempted by the Atrix.

The N900 probably could´ve done the above tasks with proper Nokia support but we know how that went.

I´ll give Nokia a chance until the fall to get the N9 smoothed and coming out working like the Atrix, with a laptop dock and a desktop dock. If not, it´s Android and the ugly-M baby. I´m not setting my hopes high up for Nokia though, it´s getting quite late in the game.

I want to carry 1 device and then docking stations around for work and play. 1 processing unit and then peripherals. Period.

BK201 2011-01-15 16:43

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Would it be crazy to suggest that perhaps the N9 we all saw has now been scrapped?

Dave999 2011-01-15 17:11

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BK201 (Post 920942)
Would it be crazy to suggest that perhaps the N9 we all saw has now been scrapped?

you can't be sure you have seen the n9 and you can't be sure it will be called n9. Their will be a first meego phone...in 350 days that is.

gerbick 2011-01-15 18:21

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by attila77 (Post 920428)
You sure 'bout that ?

Yep, I'm sure about that. Saying something isn't optimized doesn't equate to inferior by any stretch of your imagination. If it's not optimized today, it can be tomorrow.

Quote:

Anyway, MeeGo actually has far more public multicore hardware than Android, it's just that you need to take the Nokia glasses off. There is the myriad of dual-core atom systems, from ARM side there is the Pandaboard, and, yes, even Tegra2 builds exist. Also, Honeycomb and Xoom et al are not released yet.
I'm not the person with Nokia glasses on. In fact, stating that I, of all people, have Nokia glasses on is amazingly hysterical. Having dual cores and being threaded all the way down to all of your processes are two different things. Can't wait to see that level of optimization in all areas on any of these mobile OS's.

Quote:

And, the usual - there is no such thing as a "final version of MeeGo" - there are only releases. There was a 1.0 release, a 1.1, a 1.2, there will be a 1.3, etc. Calling any of them final or even 'ready' is misleading at best (you will not see any version on retail products of major vendors anyway without the appropriate level of customization and optimization).
And by "final" I meant released in a product that folks can go out and buy. I don't mean the WeTab - it's not out in any other region(s) than Germany and Belgium (or is that Holland).

Wow, you swung and missed on all of your "points". Nice leap of faith though. I give you a B- on that alone.

Ciao!

Dave999 2011-01-15 23:26

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
349...three...four...nine...

attila77 2011-01-16 11:42

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gerbick (Post 920989)
Yep, I'm sure about that. Saying something isn't optimized doesn't equate to inferior by any stretch of your imagination. If it's not optimized today, it can be tomorrow.

Even if we forego these blanket statements you provided no basis for, now somehow 'M isn't optimized and A has seen more work' does not imply M is inferior to A... Well, if that doesn't mean M is inferior it can only mean A is so hopeless that even though it's being heavily worked on, it cannot rise above unoptimized status. Dunno, must be my English.

Quote:

I'm not the person with Nokia glasses on. In fact, stating that I, of all people, have Nokia glasses on is amazingly hysterical. Having dual cores and being threaded all the way down to all of your processes are two different things. Can't wait to see that level of optimization in all areas on any of these mobile OS's.
Well, good news ! Meego and Qt already do that.

Quote:

And by "final" I meant released in a product that folks can go out and buy. I don't mean the WeTab - it's not out in any other region(s) than Germany and Belgium (or is that Holland).
Then I can say - that final version will never-ever be released, except for maybe low-q knockoffs. Every vendor will do their optimizations. That's why you can't say 'ready'. MeeGo 1.1 might not have functionality/service X, or might sluggish because of driver Y, but that does not mean products based on it don't have that sorted out (just like you count the services Google provides towards Android features even though they are not part of the core OS features).

blipnl 2011-01-16 13:46

Re: Elop said N9 is a 2011 event. It's 2011! Where is it?
 
I will keep track of any good mobile news. Still, my N900 contract runs till december 2011 so imma sit back and enjoy the Q1, then 2, followed by 3 and then in Q4 look for a decent successor of the N900. ;)


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:05.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8