maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Community (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   should people who anonymously troll via tags have their tagging privileges revoked? (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=71738)

chemist 2011-04-04 08:56

Re: should people who anonymously troll via tags have their tagging privileges revoked?
 
Just cleaned it a bit...

@abill: you don't mind flaming moderators and I don't mind give you infraction points, right? I have a weekend as everyone else and like to use my (rare) spare time with family... moderators are not reading forums 24/7.

I know it is not the friendly way to give infractions by random occurrence but I barely give infractions and when I do I consider it a warning (that's like a speeding ticket right?).

Keep it clean, have a nice day!

Kangal 2011-04-04 09:11

Re: The Tag Trolling issue
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Texrat (Post 981361)

Quote:

Originally Posted by number41 (Post 981359)
I have reported that one, a few hours ago.

There are different moderators for different sections in different timezones. Just gotta be patient. ;)

I still don't get why you/another mod deleted my last post.
Just tell me if it was the image that was offensive, because personally to me: its hilarious!

edit: Okay I will post the image here, and if you really do think its offensive let me know (here or pm) so I can edit it out, I just don't like the feeling of searching for deleted posts.

http://chzgifs.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/banned.gif

mishmich 2011-04-04 10:20

Re: should people who anonymously troll via tags have their tagging privileges revoked?
 
My response to the comment on weirdness was removed (not sure why - there was nothing offensive in it), and my tally has dropped back from 108 to 113 posts to go before I can add irrelevant tags to irrelevant posts...

abill_uk 2011-04-04 10:41

Re: should people who anonymously troll via tags have their tagging privileges revoked?
 
WOW this has not only been changed but cleaned right up, good work Chemist even if you do feel the need to single me out rather than the long standing members, oh well i need a year or 2 on here before i get them privledges.

Main thing is it is clean and i am very happy about that and once again THANKYOU Chemist your a good mod.

Texrat 2011-04-04 12:55

Re: The Tag Trolling issue
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kangal (Post 981519)
I still don't get why you/another mod deleted my last post.
Just tell me if it was the image that was offensive, because personally to me: its hilarious!

edit: Okay I will post the image here, and if you really do think its offensive let me know (here or pm) so I can edit it out, I just don't like the feeling of searching for deleted posts.

Wasn't me. But I would personally prefer we avoid embedding animated gifs...

one1002 2011-04-04 18:09

Re: should people who anonymously troll via tags have their tagging privileges revoked?
 
just an idea...why don't just change the "minimum 300 posts to tag" to "minimum 300 THANKED to tag"? lol :D:D:D

users with 300 thanked or more, should display some intra/interpersonal quality rather than users with 300 posts...i guess....?

and also, users with 300 thanked should have contributed to the community as well..be it in terms of ideas, applications, facts, or any useful posts.. :)

jedi 2011-04-04 18:29

Re: should people who anonymously troll via tags have their tagging privileges revoked?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by one1002 (Post 981840)
just an idea...why don't just change the "minimum 300 posts to tag" to "minimum 300 THANKED to tag"? lol :D:D:D

users with 300 thanked or more, should display some intra/interpersonal quality rather than users with 300 posts...i guess....?

and also, users with 300 thanked should have contributed to the community as well..be it in terms of ideas, applications, facts, or any useful posts.. :)

Nah - I fit that criteria and I still see tagtrolling as a fine sport and a great source of entertainment :)

JamesBond@ge 2011-04-04 18:35

Re: should d**kheads who anonymously troll via tags have their tagging privileges revoked?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by number41 (Post 981316)
I see. Well, I'm aware that I went overboard and have said so; I apologize.

On that post, it is so far back now that it makes no sense whatsoever to revisit it, so I'll just leave it be; if you still want to report it, go ahead.

Also, while I strive not to become ignore material, I can't do a thing should you decide do to it.

Once again, I'm aware I went oveboard, but I so did in what I thought would be a way to contribute to the community.

Fair enough. You seem like a smart bloke with a degree of humility in admitting that.

Don't be a fool though and align yourself with the likes of abill_uk, who posseses none of the above qualities. Why do you think so many tags spring up about him? Not just from one person either.

mishmich 2011-04-04 19:26

Re: should people who anonymously troll via tags have their tagging privileges revoked?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by one1002 (Post 981840)
just an idea...why don't just change the "minimum 300 posts to tag" to "minimum 300 THANKED to tag"? lol :D:D:D

users with 300 thanked or more, should display some intra/interpersonal quality rather than users with 300 posts...i guess....?

and also, users with 300 thanked should have contributed to the community as well..be it in terms of ideas, applications, facts, or any useful posts.. :)

I suggested this in one of the other of the three threads on this topic currently active (should be merged). But I'd suggest 150 'thanks' (as then I'd qualify). I also suggested a 'no thanks' option, with each 'no thanks' subtracting two from the 'thanked' total.

danramos 2011-04-04 19:43

Re: should people who anonymously troll via tags have their tagging privileges revoked?
 
http://www.motifake.com/image/demoti...1288876992.jpg


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:28.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8