maemo.org - Talk - [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)

- Maemo 5 / Fremantle (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=40)

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900

Quote:

Originally Posted by yrannadx (Post 1166153)

The fact that the feedback is already very mixed, would bring me if I would be a developer, a question mark. While experienced contributors clearly are explaining and proving why the patch is useless, other users are claiming battery improvement. It might be that some users don't know how to load for example dsp profile, and for that reason battery patch was helping them. Others might just want to help you with good feedback just because of subjective reasons, reasons which I don't think is appropriate to raise here.

so clearly hah ?
update honey update to the latest versions

@karam
latest speedpatch version is awesome
not a single lag since yesterday

keep up the good work

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / NEW VERSION OF SPEEDPATCH(now uses syspart config, no more xterminal problem) TESTERS NEEDED

same here
latest speedpatch rocks :) :) :)

thank you

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / NEW VERSION OF SPEEDPATCH(now uses syspart config, no more xterminal problem) TESTERS NEEDED

expected behavior from the sp
thanks for reply

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / NEW VERSION OF SPEEDPATCH(now uses syspart config, no more xterminal problem) TESTERS NEEDED

@karam - well, it took you how much, an year? To achieve what is already in stock n900. If I understand correctly, your latest speedpatch uses cgroups assigment already done by Nokia, just moves mount point from /syspart to /dev/cgroup. And puts processes started from terminal into a different cgroup. Bravo. So, will you elaborate on how this "speedpatch" makes things better than ohmd (which is responsible for process distributon along cgroups) for hildon-desktop, dialer, browser, etc?

Of course there are reports of speedup with it, AS THE STOCK NOKIA CONFIGURATION IS USED.

And BTW it would still be incompatible with any SW which tries to use /syspart for cgroup directory creation, as you are moving the mount point to a different place.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / NEW VERSION OF SPEEDPATCH(now uses syspart config, no more xterminal problem) TESTERS NEEDED

Quote:

Originally Posted by freemangordon (Post 1166208)

@karam - well, it took you how much, an year?

looks like yes but there is a reason for this
1- year 2009 i didn't anything about linux
2- from 2010--> 2012 exactly /4/6/2012 i have a to study for my bakaloriat
and the one in my country (f*cken hard)
ask anyone from syria
so i have a very little time to dev on N900

Quote:

Originally Posted by freemangordon (Post 1166208)

To achieve what is already in stock n900. If I understand correctly, your latest speedpatch uses cgroups assigment already done by Nokia, just moves mount point from /syspart to /dev/cgroup. And puts processes started from terminal into a different cgroup. Bravo. So, will you elaborate on how this "speedpatch" makes things better than ohmd (which is responsible for process distributon along cgroups) for hildon-desktop, dialer, browser, etc?

nokia didn't use cgroup
they used ohmd to do as cgroup does
but i can see that cgroup gives more responsible and performance

Quote:

Originally Posted by freemangordon (Post 1166208)

So, will you elaborate on how this "speedpatch" makes things better than ohmd

read 1st post

Quote:

Originally Posted by freemangordon (Post 1166208)

Of course there are reports of speedup with it, AS THE STOCK NOKIA CONFIGURATION IS USED.

how would it be speedup if it was AS before
i used the NOKIA configs with cgroup which gave a quite good result
PS: older version didn't use Nokia configs and though improved N900 a bit (mostly noticed :hildon-desktop)

Quote:

Originally Posted by freemangordon (Post 1166208)

And BTW it would still be incompatible
with any SW which tries to use /syspart for cgroup directory creation, as you are moving the mount point to a different place.

currently i haven't seen any SW that modifies /syspart
and if any future SWs
well thaey will have to check for speedpatch existen in postinst

anything else would you come up with ?
perhaps you would say "the new nokia Firmware pr1.4 WILL NOT be compatible with speedpatch in future"

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / NEW VERSION OF SPEEDPATCH(now uses syspart config, no more xterminal problem) TESTERS NEEDED

This thread is full of fail.

...and yes, I'M BACK! MWAHHAHAHAHA :D

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / NEW VERSION OF SPEEDPATCH(now uses syspart config, no more xterminal problem) TESTERS NEEDED

Quote:

Originally Posted by karam (Post 1166228)

.
.
.
nokia didn't use cgroup
they used ohmd to do as cgroup does
but i can see that cgroup gives more responsible and performance

Bullsh|t, do "cat /proc/mounts | grep syspart" on a device without "speedpatch" installed and you will see:

cgroup /syspart cgroup rw,freezer,memory,cpu 0 0

ohmd distributes processes along cgroups using /usr/share/policy/current/rx51/syspart.conf.

Kernel does not distribute processes to cgroups, it is userland who should do it

Quote:

read 1st post

There is nothing in the OP describing how the processes are distributed along different cgroups.

Quote:

By saying AS BEFORE I meant that those users have had a previous version of SP before installing latest, which reverts cgroups configuration to stock (excluding different mount point).

Quote:

Currently you don't see obvious things, let alone some future software. Take it as a piece of advice - do not modify system configurations which could affect current/future SW except absolutely neccessary. Which is not the case with speedpatch.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / NEW VERSION OF SPEEDPATCH(now uses syspart config, no more xterminal problem) TESTERS NEEDED

Quote:

Originally Posted by corduroysack (Post 1166175)

i get over 2 days with no patches and stock nokia kernel so what's the plus?

It depends on what you are doing in those couple of days.Me for example Im using My N900 for:

-Bluetooth connection to the stereo in my car
-GPS
-Constant 3g streaming of internet radio to my stereo.
-browsing the internet
-emails
-watching some videos
-background full of widgets
-.....and so on, and I still have 2 days of battery.

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / NEW VERSION OF SPEEDPATCH(now uses syspart config, no more xterminal problem) TESTERS NEEDED

@freemangordon
wtf man when speedpatch was ignoring syspart you shouted on karam because of that

now when speedpatch doesn't ignore syspart you shouted on karam again because he took a year to do so !! also you said softwares which modifies syspart conflicts with speedpatch ? but there are no any

Take it as a piece of advice - leave this person alone and let him modify system configurations that improves N900 response
n900 doesn't have a future anyway
i say if you like it use it
if you don't then don't

@ammyt
you full of Bullsh|t by the way
...and yes get the hell out of here,kid

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / NEW VERSION OF SPEEDPATCH(now uses syspart config, no more xterminal problem) TESTERS NEEDED

+1 to seker_94

simple question to freemangordon now
does speedpatch fock up the system ?
yes > facepalm
no > leave this boy alone
it does nothing > another facepalm