![]() |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / Please Vote For Speed Patch To Get Moved To Extras
Quote:
There were many discussions about it .. e.g: http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php...16#post1120716 http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=71127 This bug will be fixed in KP50 (and is already fixed in Kp49 pre50!) :) |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / NEW VERSION OF SPEEDPATCH(now uses syspart config, no more xterminal problem) TESTERS NEEDED
Quote:
Quote:
currently i'm trying to find a way to inject a script inside /usr/share/application/hildon/*.desktop after Exec to put every application launched in User cgroup still to early (need to prepare a backup,restore...etc) Quote:
well nothing much just the last explosion destroyed every window of my house (still nothing much) @Mohammed Muid this reboot problem from xterm is not caused by neither of patches it's by KP (probably fixed in the latest version) pre50 check your self by switching to omap @getnani maybe somthing else is causing the vibration problem speedpatch/batterypatch has nothing to do with it @ed_boner it's still bug free version that's why imm asking for voting to move to extras @gilesn it's not only about these setups many other things may cause extra battery deain such as many many widgets, battery monitore apps....etc |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / Please Vote For Speed Patch To Get Moved To Extras
ok man..just reporting..seems strange though that noone is having reboot-blackscreen issoue and all of the suddent we all have it with no changes made in kp, only an update in sp..but if you say its kp fault..who am i to disagree..btw for me its the only issue..in everything else sp seems perfect.
|
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / Please Vote For Speed Patch To Get Moved To Extras
I had my first crash and reboot in almost 2 years with the latest speedpatch.Phone was unresponsive but after a 2nd reboot all seems to be working ok......something is fishy
|
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / Please Vote For Speed Patch To Get Moved To Extras
@ed_boner
because Mohammed muid mentioned that i bet you haven't try before installing sp it is bloody confirmed that the reboot problem is caused by KP why don't u try booting normal kernel (OMAP) and see your self that the reboot problem from xterm is solved @sophocha it's known that you have to reboot twice after installing sp first one will remove everything from /syspart second one is to place create /dev/cgroup the first one usually gets laggy N900 but the second and the rest are all smooth |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / NEW VERSION OF SPEEDPATCH(now uses syspart config, no more xterminal problem) TESTERS NEEDED
CPU back to normal, overnight battery drain was down to flashlight-extra's daemon, it had to go!
|
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / Please Vote For Speed Patch To Get Moved To Extras
well karam..because i dont know how..dont even know what OMAP is..i am just an industrial designer man..maybe the closer to a final non technical consumer u have in the forum :)..but its kool..i believe you..no problem..so i guess we will wait for kp50 right?
|
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / Please Vote For Speed Patch To Get Moved To Extras
omap is the default nokia kernel
you can change to it via multiboot or uninstall KP and yes waiting for 50 is better |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / Please Vote For Speed Patch To Get Moved To Extras
the only consequence of locking kernel at 805 permanently is battery drain?
|
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / Please Vote For Speed Patch To Get Moved To Extras
there are many reasons for battery drain
and of course locking at 805 is useless and point less unless you know what your doing |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / Please Vote For Speed Patch To Get Moved To Extras
just want to confirm that im also facing black boot screen problem problem is gone if i uninstall speedpatch. mainly i face this problem when i boot from Nitdroid to Maemo. when i select reboot in nitdroid it restarts device but when i select Maemo in multiboot it just stays at blank black screen untill i switch it off manually and restart it. Not having this issue when speedpatch is uninstalled.
and one more thing that was my first time when i installed speedpatch and really friends it boosts N900's performance. no lags, no stops anything. thanks Karam |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / Please Vote For Speed Patch To Get Moved To Extras
hmm
well switching from Maemo5 to nitdroid is just like reflashing between 2 kernels this would be an expected behavior as each switch is just like a new install for speedpatch @ALL please i need 2 more votes to move speedpatch to extras link @1st post |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / Please Vote For Speed Patch To Get Moved To Extras
I'm facing that problem too. didn't use to happen with previous versions of speedpatch.
So no solution? |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / Please Vote For Speed Patch To Get Moved To Extras
@ahmadamaj
i haven't used nitdroid before so my expectation of older versions is: when switching between maemo5 and nitdroid you get the xterm error another reboot would fix it however this xterm error used to appear in the older versions many times now instead of that error message only switching between kernels or flashing would need 2 boots but in an easy fast way will try to solve it if i got some free time |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
@hello all
as you see pali has released a new KP (v50) so i would like to know if their is any conflict with batterypatch can some one tell me the output of : Code:
uname -r2.6.28.10-power50 if so then it's all ok because i have pre intergated this to the latest batterypatch if not then i'll update it to the new output sorry i can't check my self as i don't have my N900 now // forgot to say that speedpatch is now in extras |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
Quote:
~ $ uname -r 2.6.28.10-power50 ~ $ Seems to be ok:) |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
i see battery patch broken tried i did a apt-get install --reinstall but cpu clock didnt raise above 600 Mhz
|
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
hi karam, hope everything is ok with you...i was having this reboot issues, and you told me that it was an kp49 issue.
i installed kp50 and still have this issues, so i tried uninstalling speedpatch..now i have no issues what so ever..just thought you should know..tks. |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
Quote:
|
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
Quote:
The KP50 changelog says ''fixed Reboot Problem'', but this is an over issue. This disappoints me http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...postcount=2950 Answer: http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...postcount=2957 |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
tks a lot willi..we have a new bug then..and maybe reacts with some speedpatch stuff...because in my case i am ok now after removing it, but i am gonna test a few more days and then report...
not so bad uninstalling speedpatch: in kp49 the sp was noticible specially with qtlockscreen as it was seriously more responsive..with kp50 i see no difference what so ever, now without sp and everithing is fast and smooth and responsive..freeman and pali and the rest of the team really cracked it this time:)..i dont know what speedpatch can bring better for the future, still leaves me great memories of the past..ths karam, keep up the good work! |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
Got the output all ok.
|
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
can someone confirm anything about KP50 reboot problem ?
i want someone (if possible) to do this : if you have speedpatch installed than : 1- install KP50 2- reboot more that 3 or 4 times to check the reboot problem 3- if solved then KP50 solved it , if not then >> 4- uninstall speedpatch and retest i can't do those tests right now as i don't have my N900 but i highly doubt that it's a speedpatch problem because some users *who are not using speedpatch* are having that reboot problem @ed_boner well got nthn to say enjoy the few months,years left with ur N900 it will vanish from earth so soon @awett ehh did you reboot after installing it ? and what did xterminal tell you ? again can someone confirm this report ? thank you all |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
what do you mean?
|
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
what do i mean about which part ? ;)
|
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
@ed_boner
well got nthn to say enjoy the few months,years left with ur N900 it will vanish from earth so soon i dont get your point btw...the verification method you sugested is the same i have used..now without sp no bugs or reboots what so ever |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
Quote:
If someone actively following this thread isn't sure what you're talking about, I doubt anyone not closely following it will get it either. |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / Please Vote For Speed Patch To Get Moved To Extras
I am talking about THIS Reboot Problem:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
Hi karam,
could you modify the battery-patch kernel-power dependency so that it also accept the kernel-power-bootimage version for those using u-boot thanks |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / Please Vote For Speed Patch To Get Moved To Extras
Quote:
B> I had this bug in KP49, and just seconds ago rebooted via command line under KP50, and it rebooted cleanly. I rebooted primarily to be sure all the latest new CSSU stuff was in place and happy. That may have been a fluke (as I've had it work under K49 on occasion as well), but so far it's 1 for 1. :) |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks / Please Vote For Speed Patch To Get Moved To Extras
Quote:
I didn't write it into kernel-power thread, cause Estele has already pointed at this problem (please read previous page) and I don't like to spam the thread. http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...postcount=2950 Quote:
|
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
Just to make it clear - the "reboot bug" which is fixed in KP50 is as following:
If you have USB cable/charger connected to your n900 and try to reboot, the device does a shutdown and/or enters a mini reboot loop instead of rebooting to maemo. That happens only when USB is connected. The bug you're discussing here is a different animal, it happens only on a couple of devices and so far there is not much useful info so one could fix it. |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
tks again freeman..althoug karam told us several times tha the reboot issue was kp49 problem and it would be solved in kp50..i can confirm now on my own that is not so.
|
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
@freemangordon
i believe have mentioned before that the reboot problem(s) are caused by a change from KPv 40 to v46 or v42 also KP40 was super perfect stable (no reboot problems, fast and smooth as OMAP) don't know if someone have noticed that OMAP is faster than kernel-power v42=< at the same clock speed which is 600mhz so if you have some time you may compaire sources (patches) betwean those versions and track down that bug just removing changes from v42 or v46 which are not in v40 and bulding the kernel then testing would be the clean way to track down another reboot issue causer just a suggestion though @pierrem well batterypatch depends on : kernel-power, kernel-power-settings if you want to install kernel-power-bootimage then just install it after installing batterypatch there would be no problems so there is no need to modify the depends @ed_boner this reboot problem might be caused by many different things freemangordon and pali have fixed a one cause of it i advice you to try booting OMAP kernel if the reboot problem is gone then there is something in KP50 conflicting with some app or so if the reboot problem is still there that means another app is causing it and this discussion must continie on KP thread |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
i had the reboot problem all the time..uninstaled speedpatch..no more reboots..not even one..i found my solution karam, tks.
|
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
hi everybody
i am new to maemo5 you are here talking about the bug king reboot problem right ? my 2 cents i have installed kernel power 50 with speedpatch which is really goodthe reboot bug is gone but it was in kp-49 the one freemangordon posted before @ed_bornor it is not speedpatch who is causing this trouble only on the first install of it this happens after the second reboot everything goes well so happy with you guys :) thank you for keeping the development of our beloved n900 |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
damn speedpatch makes my n900 ****in slow now, :confused:
|
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
Quote:
When I moved to u-boot, I removed kernel-power and installed kernel-power-bootimage to avoid having my NAND flashed with every kernel-power update. Batterypatch does not depend on kernel-power, it depends either on kernel-power or kernel-power-bootimage, the difference being how users choose to load this kernel at boot. Therefore I ask you to reconsider my request. |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
pierrem i'm not offense at all :)
but i didn't understand ur request before so your request is : changing the depends of batterypatch to : kernel-power or kernel-power-bootimage ? instead of kernel-power only ? what xterminal tells you when you install batterypatch does it force you to install kernel-power while you don't want to ? or what ? i have never used u-boot before please explain more |
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Speed Patch + Battery Patch + Tweaks --> Everything Needed To Have A Perfect N900
Quote:
Quote:
Extracted from "apt-cache show batterypatch": Depends: dbus-scripts, kernel-power, kernel-power-modules, kernel-power-flasher, kernel-power-settings So currently if one wants to install battery patch one have to install all the above packages. It should be at least: Depends: dbus-scripts, kernel-power | kernel-power-bootimage, kernel-power-modules, kernel-power-settings |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 22:22. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8