Originally Posted by Kangal (Post 1169046)

Its scary that you have desires *wink* with girls that young

Originally Posted by Kangal (Post 1169032)

My NOTE is more advanced than that:
-The features (GLONASS and active digitizer on the NOTE)
-Dualcore beats Quadcore - on Android they're equally fast (maybe the Exynos is even faster), but Exynos will likely use less battery, wont get as hot as the Tegra3, supports open-source codecs
-The screen tech on NOTE is better (lower battery drain, deep blacks and vivid colours)
-The screen on the NOTE is better (higher resolution, bigger size)
-The NOTE WILL NOT get on-screen buttons so the screen space and resolution will be even higher
-The NOTE is available now, cheaper, has a big community, will be getting ICS soon (officially/community)

But compared to the Gnex, this is a worthy rival...so I say:
http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ll...ib3wo1_400.jpg

Originally Posted by ammyt (Post 1173264)

Hmmmmmmmmm...The Optimus 4X HD out-throws the ASUS Trans. Prime by a small margin, and the Prime's score is the double of the Exynos's chip in the GSII.
Note: The GSII performs significantly better than the Note because of the screen resolution/pixel density.

So, benchmarks show that the 4X HD is more than twice as powerful as the GSII, but since I'm talking to Kangal over here, I trust you on such Android/Chips stuff as much as I trust you on my kids (don't have any xD).

Originally Posted by Kangal (Post 1173450)

How about something that's actually comparable?
SGTab7.7 (has the same SoC and resolution as SGNOTE) vs ASUS Prime.

If Samsung does a better job with the software, then there's no reason the NOTE could be faster than the 4XHD. Just look at Nokia and its 41MP camera_phone that runs Symbian.

Conclusion: you're a troll