![]() |
Re: Why do people say MeeGo is dead?
Quote:
Of course it's not (as) compatible w/Maemo5, the goal was to maintain compatibility between Vanilla & Harmattan. Have you ever used MeeGoCE, now known as MeR/Nemo??? Quote:
It was part of the project & was designed to enable a gradual transition to MeeGo proper. But as that project now longer exists it can no longer perform its role, so it makes little sense to refer to it as MeeGo. In a technical sense there's no question that it has much more in common w/Maemo5 than Vanilla MeeGo. Even Nokia tellingly re-geared its marketing plans last year by tacking Harmattan onto the end of MeeGo. But I don't care either way, people can call it MeeGo/M-H/Harmattan/Maemo6x, doesn't bother me I prefer to call it Maemo6x because it makes more sense to me, but the general public couldn't care less. Quote:
The 1st x86 (Read: Intel/medfield) ph was due in roughly Dec 2011, it's clear now that probably wouldn't have been possible. But given what Intel's delivered this year, it's quite apparent that June/July would've been possible. The plan was always to have at least two Maemo6x phones, possibly a third if MeeGo proper & the 1st x86 phone needed it. So it seems we would've had a 3rd Maemo6x phone by now or shipping, & the 1st x86 would've been announced "roughly" June/July. This is all assuming of course that the team remained at full size, or even grew slightly since Feb last year. Instead of dropping by over 75%.... Quote:
Security/permissions framework in Maemo6x is quickly/increasingly becoming less of a hindrance. Just a few months ago people were bleating that it's "game over" thanks to AEGIS etc. Maemo5/6 weren't particularly amazing from an openness perspective, even compared to Android. MeeGo proper would've been far more compliant in that regard... Now that Intel & co's transformed it into Tizen, lets hope they actually make it a success this time. It has it's drawbacks that vary in magnitude depending who you ask, but I'll be giving it the benefit of the doubt. *I'm not understating that, it is a "biggy", but still somewhat of an open question. |
Re: Why do people say MeeGo is dead?
I really hope they'll continue with Maemo6 one day..
Tizen? rather not.. i can picture its speed with html5.. it's awesome on the web, but a web technology should stay as a web technology. C++ is portable enough as well as Qt. not getting the point |
Re: Why do people say MeeGo is dead?
Quote:
|
Re: Why do people say MeeGo is dead?
Quote:
Enough of this Maemo/MeeGo crap debate we're having.... More chatter about Tizen & what we each think/know would also be more productive. |
Re: Why do people say MeeGo is dead?
Last I read, Intel dropped out / gave up on Tizen, leaving only Samsung. Might be wrong though.
|
Re: Why do people say MeeGo is dead?
Quote:
As a user, I expect it will be much less interesting than Maemo. I expect the security framework will be at least as forbidding as that in MeeGo-Harmattan. Then there is the question as to how easy it will be to install any interesting linux tools. I doubt there will even be xterm readily available. |
Re: Why do people say MeeGo is dead?
I don't care how you people call it but I call it NnineOS from now on and it is dead only when this phone isn't usable anymore.
|
Re: Why do people say MeeGo is dead?
I don't want native apps. My tv is a computer, my car has a computer, and my phone is a Computer, my computer is a computer. I prefer it slower and more accessible. I want an OS with only browser.
|
Re: Why do people say MeeGo is dead?
Quote:
|
Re: Why do people say MeeGo is dead?
Quote:
And i agree with Jalyst that the current discussion is outdated. Hopefully we will hear about Meltemi this year. Before Nokia World that will probably be one big Windows fest? |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 00:31. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8