![]() |
Re: Google drops XMPP support in its new chat/Talk/Hangouts
Quote:
Only dead fish go with the flow. |
Re: Google drops XMPP support in its new chat/Talk/Hangouts
Quote:
Yes, people expect these things for ""free"" these days. But as mentioned before by other and by me there are plenty free jabber-services available. Google just used to be one of them. |
Re: Google drops XMPP support in its new chat/Talk/Hangouts
I do stand by my own opinions, and I do try to educate people *when* I think there is some possibility they will listen to me. I have converted people to open source software even by not giving them another choice so that they can see for themselves why this is better.
On the other hand I refuse to do lectures or remote technical support to people I don't care about that I might have to communicate with. Trying to convince somebody to switch must come easy. Not all the people want to tinker with technology and most don't even know what an open standard is. I understand that it might be less hard than I originally thought to make somebody switch to jabber but it still isn't painless. Skype is there and you just need a username. Whatsapp doesn't even need a username. Messing with server configuration is hard for some people especially if they carry various devices. Even FSF recognized that making everyone switch is hard and they decided to make a free swf renderer (gnash) and not convince everybody to switch. While romantic and ultimately Good, converting everybody to jabber today, after Google dropped it, is just a dream. Think of something else. |
Re: Google drops XMPP support in its new chat/Talk/Hangouts
Quote:
I want something fully open some kind of "safe open community" were I can safely store everything online cryptated and only share stuff that a want to share to others. No damn marketing **** on the site. Ofcource that is not possible without some kind of fee. But I would be willing pay a montly/yearly fee for that community and payment using bitcoins to make it even more easier instead of todays unsafe card crap. And because the community would use open rotocols it would support any existing devices. No inlock depepend on what device you have! |
Re: Google drops XMPP support in its new chat/Talk/Hangouts
Creating a XMPP/jabber account isn't that hard. For example with Pidgin you just enter a nickname and a server (hot-chilli.net, jabber.org or whatever). Tick create account box, press OK and you're all set.
It's not any harder to start using than walled services, less advertised maybe so average joes don't flock to it. No problem with that though. My friends and family can contact me via XMPP if they want to. Maybe few GTalk users will be cut off from my contacts list due to google's new course, but ultimately that's their choice (to select non-interoperable server). I share ajalkane's view in that I don't want to actively push my choices to other people. Everyone can use whatever service/OS/color of shirt they feel comfortable with as long as it doesn't limit my freedom of choice. |
Re: Google drops XMPP support in its new chat/Talk/Hangouts
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Google drops XMPP support in its new chat/Talk/Hangouts
Quote:
|
Re: Google drops XMPP support in its new chat/Talk/Hangouts
Quote:
Of course if you can convince someone who accepts your arguments - why not. Some people aren't opposed to better alternatives, they might just be unaware of them. |
Re: Google drops XMPP support in its new chat/Talk/Hangouts
|
Re: Google drops XMPP support in its new chat/Talk/Hangouts
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 12:51. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8