![]() |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
Now we need another post from you, with the log off the serial console while booting the Neo900! :) |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
first batch of 24 sourced N900 arrived:
http://neo900.org/stuff/joerg/random...unbox_24_N900/ http://neo900.org/stuff/joerg/random...ple-inspected/ here the http://neo900.org/stuff/joerg/random...160414_006.jpg shows screenprotector with mountig foil still applied. Peeling off screen protector the digitizer genuine surface looks pristine: http://neo900.org/stuff/joerg/random...160414_007.jpg Alas peeling off and reapplying the protector gives us: http://neo900.org/stuff/joerg/random...160414_008.jpg So I suggest I keep the protectors for our customers to decide whether they want to keep or remove them |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
At least it means that we can see whether the screen protector was removed before without peeling it off during the control, and therefore see if the N900 is still pristine from the first glance.
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Hi,
another month of silence has gone again. I'm sorry to say that I feel not very comfortable with this. What about the status of this project, what about progress? Maybe it is an idea to inform the "community" in a more continous way eg in a agile style (not a daily scrum meeting, but every 2 weeks maybe). Please give information about: What did you do last 2 weeks? What will you do now and next 2 weeks? Are there any impediments in your way? I want to have a feeling that there is something going on.... Cheers |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
There are actually pretty good news: Joerg's search for someone to do
the layout of the v2 prototype finally paid off, and we're now working out the details of how to accomplish the transition. As expected, this will involve a change of EDA (Electronic Design Automation) tools: at least the layout will be made with Altium, instead of Eagle. While Altium is an expensive commercial platform, this is actually more open than what we had planned before, given that Eagle would only have been suitable with Nikolaus' private layout tools (for Eagle). So instead of being compatible with only a single person, our process will become compatible with a sizeable portion of the EE (Electrical Engineering) world. There is also interest in using KiCAD, which would be optimal regarding openness, but this option is still being researched. In any case, there is a tool (altium2kicad) for converting design files from Altium to KiCAD that seems to be quite good. Knowing what tools will be used for v2 and what inputs will be useful for the layouter unblocked a lot of other things, since we can now plan and implement a strategy for migrating the design to these tools. So we're happily busy cleaning up the schematics and converting things that used to be Eagle-centric to be Altium-friendly. - Werner |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
hmmm did I miss somthing? When did Nikolaus leave the project as a subcontractor?
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
All I read was, "more delays" :( |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?p=1502058 Though I can see how this could have been ambiguous. In any case, the issue was discussed extensively on #neo900. This is the first mention I could find: http://irclog.whitequark.org/neo900/2016-01-29#15341340 Nikolaus mentioned his (un)availability situation here: http://lists.goldelico.com/pipermail...ch/001383.html Joerg made some attempts to use the regular layout functionality of Eagle, i.e., mainly the autorouter, but that ultimately only confirmed that Eagle (without Nikolaus' private tools) was not suitable for the task. There were other things to work on while the layout situation was stalled, e.g., sourcing, mechanical, and also some component issues, but that of course did little to bring v2 closer. So I'm rather happy that we can finally continue progressing with what is in our "critical path", even if the other things are of course important as well. - Werner |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
cheers jOERG |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
An excerpt from freenode IRC channel #devuan (Jaromil being the founder of https://www.devuan.org basically)
[2016-05-31 Tue 20:37:51] <jaromil> DocScrutinizer05: we were talking about you just now me and hellekin [2016-05-31 Tue 20:38:25] <jaromil> and we think we have great potential and should put some things straight with the neo900 community [2016-05-31 Tue 20:38:28] <jaromil> so we can help each other [2016-05-31 Tue 20:38:39] <jaromil> lets say you can count on all the CI infrastructure [2016-05-31 Tue 20:38:44] <DocScrutinizer05> :-) [2016-05-31 Tue 20:38:48] <jaromil> and we spin the images on it [2016-05-31 Tue 20:39:02] <DocScrutinizer05> that sounds AWESOME [2016-05-31 Tue 20:39:10] <jaromil> so you can concentrate on the coding [2016-05-31 Tue 20:39:37] <DocScrutinizer05> well, coding is ... Pali and freemangordon ;-) [2016-05-31 Tue 20:39:40] <jaromil> this would be a good goal and win win, doesn't costs much right now [2016-05-31 Tue 20:39:48] <DocScrutinizer05> indeed This means that Maemo and particularly the FPTF "fork" have a cooperative and helpful compatible upstream again. Plus a Devuan that works OOTB (though without several of the maemo-specific apps, of course), for all the Debian fans. (on an irrelevant sidenote: Hellekin already created a new git with bugtracker and all for internal Neo900 maintenance et al there, and I hope we'll see a [public] FPTF branch shortly too) cheers jOERG |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 20:58. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8