![]() |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
"I know there been a lot of questions about OMAP3 SoC, and possible replacements, but here is another one
Since I can't find nothing on your "Technical Feasibility Study" about possibility for Intel SoC like this, I'm asking it here. Is it possible to port Fremantle from SDK Images or use something like Intel's Houdini libraries to translate ARM code, and use x86 SoC?" It's not just & only about porting Fremantle, we are also trying to be 100% compatible with maemo-repos & N900. So Intel SoC is 100% unrealistic, at least in Neo900v1 - N900 compatible one. But maybe one day :rolleyes: #lexik |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Isn't everything in fremantle already both arm and i386? Though there might be a problem if it uses a PowerVR graphics chip since there are no FOSS or even binary i386 drivers.
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Who the hell deleted the posts just now ? Or moved so where ? Miserable !
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
I suppose you're talking about this discussion: http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=92534 |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Do you have any plans to hold a presentation at "Linux Tag" in Berlin from 8th to 10th of may?
One of the topics is "Protect yourself: Security after Snowden" [1] and especially after the recent privacy discussion here I could imagine the Neo900 to fit that topic. [1] http://www.linuxtag.org/2014/en/#security |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Some kind of low fq radio communicatin should be in neo900 if possible legaly or specialy for people who certify for that :) or else i have a feeling its a same obscure cellular device going down as the network gives up:)
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Why people think imei changing help anynomity ? Then the world would have been a decent place as imei changing is too easy for most devices except the bb5 and some obscure mordems where its a bit hard. We should be focusing more on user data privacy not gsm data as gsm is always compromised as its ment to be whatever yo do as you cant be sure if you type google.com and you see a secure google page as the operater can always have a fake dns server which filters extracts the data before its even sent to actual google.com . W
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
i wonder whether the neo900 will beat the north-american-jolla.
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
According to this:-
http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p...52&postcount=2 The N900 microphone input is mono, what will be the case for the Neo900? I am aware that the line-in is planned to be stereo.. |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
tip: left headphone out 2nd: right headphone out 3rd: mono mic (also used as Video out on N900) 4th/base/sleeve: common Ground This is what's used in N900 and also in Neo900. But Neo900 allows to switch the headphone out (1, 2) to a line-in function. Probably we will include a switchable boost amp to allow connecting stereo microphone instead of line-in - though that's not yet finalized. cheers jOERG |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Will the new neo900 include also a mobile lawn mower and a mini disk washer?
I would also like a cigarette lighter. During my trips a mobile shaver could be very useful. If you include a little laundry machine the neo900 would surely be my preferred device. |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
With USB-OTG there are really no limits:
USB cigarette lighter USB shaver For the rest, please see here and here. |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
A question concerning the spacer frame:
Since it's an additional piece of hardware it's an additional potential point of failure. I tend to carry my N900 in my Jeans' side pocket which is rather tight (at least if you put a 2cm brick in it). So far my N900 managed the stress (primarily pressure and sheer force) without any problems. I'm no expert in materials science at all, so could someone please give an estimate on how the spacer frame might react to the same treatment, with respect to its material, shape (thin ring of plastic?) and mounting points? |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
Your concern regarding device mechanical stability at large though is reasonable, and we need to take care that the display half will actually be mounted in a sturdy way to the kbd half cheers jOERG |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
some news about the problematic display-connectors: they are not problematic anymore :-D
http://maemo.cloud-7.de/Neo900/media.../DSC01847.jpeg http://maemo.cloud-7.de/Neo900/media.../DSC01849.jpeg |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
So, if you guys are willing accept bitcoin, I may just invest 1 whole coin into this project, assuming the price rebounds from the crash that just occured (which it more than likely will, for various reasons, that I won't explain here)
That's $800USD. So look into accepting Bitcoin, as well as Litecoin, it may get you more funding. |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
Many thanks for your support! /jOERG |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Just out of curiosity, what's the very rough and obviously subject to change estimate for when prototypes and final devices are expected to be done? Are we looking at 3 months, 6 months, a year, longer?
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
Quote:
/j |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Oh wow I completely missed that Q3 2014 thing. Thanks.
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Just to clarify, does Q1 start in January or in April?
Sounds like a silly question but here in the UK a "financial year" is often used in the business context and that coincides with the time to pay your taxes, which is in April. Needless to say, it leads to confusion in interpreting delivery predictions ;) |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
|
KEYMAT (AZERTY) - Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
On Mon 10 February 2014 15:26:30 P. P. wrote:
> Hi guys :) > > Before I softly put my fingers on your collective lips and tell you to shut > up and take my money, I need to know... Would you have the possibility to > make some devices (or, at least one...) with an AZERTY keyboard? I've > managed to only use AZERTY devices so far, so if it can happen, that would > definitely get me on board. I totally understand if it's not possible, but > I thought it was worth asking... > > By the way, I tried to look if that was mentionned on your forum thread, > but got no match, so even if the answer is negative, you might want to > post about it somewhere discoverable. > > Thanks for this nice project, and all the best! > > P. Hi P.! the kbd layout is determined just by the keymat which is easily swapped even on N900. So your question boils down to "can we find a AZERTY keymat for you?" Alas I can't answer this question right now, we will see what's feasible and what we will get when we source the mech parts. http://headlane-parts.co.uk/Nokia_Sp...r=ASC&limit=50 cheers jOERG PS: when you send us a AZERTY keymat, we of course can assemble the device with that one instead of whatever we'll use per default. part number for french keymat: 0265855 some keymat links (sorry only few to no french ones, may change when you check again later. google for keymat N900 and the part number!): http://fonecases4u.com/keypad-for-no...-P1330682.aspx http://www.alibaba.com/showroom/n900...for-nokia.html http://www.etradesupply.com/oem-noki...ty-keypad.html http://www.thenokiaparts.com/eng/tuo...00-spare-parts http://www.dinodirect.com/nokia-n900...-keyboard.html http://www.gerry-mobilfunk.de/31361.html |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
A really nice article, and so true. For all of you "why can't we have ACME-CPU with 64GB RAM" fanboys: http://pandoralive.info/?p=2808 (and yet a nice read for all of you who already knew)
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
^^^Do not leave any mm of space in neo900 just cram it with something .
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
And, on a sidenote: afaik Nikolaus is in close contact to the pandora guys since quite a while, he helped them recover from their manufacturing disaster. /j |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Nikolaus just told that he just finished mech proto PCB rev#2, with better positioning of a number of relevant things like the holes, the switches, the USB etc.
Stay tuned for photos coming soon :) [edit] the protos are made of thicker PCB since that's cheaper and those protos are for the Neo900 junkyard anyway. alas this plus some screws not tightened make for a spacer frame gap (no spacer frame yet) that's not exactly looking nice and cute. Thus I wonder if it's a good idea to publish the photos, you might feel disappointed by watching an ugly proto. cheers jOERG |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Just donated another €200 to help this project along. I have 2 N900s that would love to have another lease on life.
|
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
EDIT: sugar on top? |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
Have an ugly prototype with sugar on top! :D http://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/8...sugarontop.jpg Notice the display part being actually connected to it \o/ |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
Since you seem so eager for it, go to http://maemo.cloud-7.de/Neo900/media...-me-proto-nr2/ to find the whole set of photos and video, incl the "ugly gap" ones I'd rather not have disclosed and a soldering oopsie Nikolaus rather not have seen published (the perfectionist he is :D - I can tell you he's usually doing an extraordinary awesome job at soldering. Nikolaus, consider it as mechanical stress test for the connectors ;) ! We had to do that anyway, eventually). We promised to be as open as possible to community, so here you are. The gap is pretty missleading on those pictures, particularly in DSC01853.jpeg (that's why I renamed it to move it all down). Maybe best idea of what the final spacer frame might be like gives DSC01854.jpeg - the gap is still too large, but final spacer frame additional height shall be roundabout no larger than the plastic bridge of case between the USB hole and the gap (which is ~2.8mm) - here the gap is larger due to the thicker PCB material used, and you see best why in other pictures the gap seems optically widened thanks to the design of the display which even on N900 creates some gap-alike discontinuity of >1mm incl the real gap. enjoy! /j |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Quote:
But then again I also put up with the horrible shape of the gta01/02/04 ;) Thanks a lot for sharing this! :D |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
Would it be possible (at least in theory) to run Harmattan on Neo900? (Sorry if this has been asked earlier, I could not find any information about this)
I would like not to derail this thread so if someone is interested to discuss this please use this thread: http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=53551 (Harmattan Hacker Edition thread). |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
I just got second-hand n900 to evaluate possibility of donating for neo900 and so far I'm very satisfied. Resistive screen and physical keyboard are superb, I'm glad you chose this formfactor. I had to fix loose usb though and hope that neo900 will address this design flaw.
Also, seeing that Debian is proposed as default OS for neo900, is there any ongoing project to backport Maemo apps/customizations to Debian? I see several such projects on wiki, but they all seem to be long dead. And unlike some other posters here I am not going to apologize for derailing thread. For God's sake, this is the only thread which is linked from neo900.org website, I've no idea why you suddenly want to be so exclusively technical here. In that case create separate thread for feedback and update neo900.org website to point there. |
Re: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
That gap is nowhere near as bad as I expected.
Thanks for the images - Puts my fears at ease. Really no issue at all! |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 20:58. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8