![]() |
Re: Discussing JollaOy strategy
So the good thing that this thread reveals is: There's no new information about anything Jolla did (or didn't) that might be seen as "intransparent" or "not open" in my book.
Instead, we're discussing different interpretations of the english language as used in a thread that is more than 6 months old and came to fame only because of trantrums and dramas by a person who allegedly didn't even own a Jolla device. I do accept that for some people, whatever they read in this thread may have caused negative emotions towards the company. The important thing for me is that if this is all the storm is about, I needn't change my mind any time soon. :) (And it could have turned out differently. It could have been that there really are serious issues one should keep an eye on.) |
Re: Discussing JollaOy strategy
Could you all just stop and agree to disagree? We are discussing the same topic with the same arguments for a lot of pages now. I don't see any benefits from this.
|
Re: Discussing JollaOy strategy
Quote:
|
Re: Discussing JollaOy strategy
Quote:
But it doesn't even matter what transparent means. I'm not saying Jolla needs to be transparent, even. I'm saying it would be beneficial for them to be more transparent than they are now and have offered some cases where I think more openness would have actually improved their public image, instead of hurt it. If Jolla would think about keeping their image shiny a little less and instead communicated with brutal honesty a little more, I think that would serve them and the community well. That is of course just my opinion, but it is not made out of malice or to hurt Jolla. fk_lx may be out for his revenge by now, but that certainly isn't the case for many of us who feel this way for much more simple and less personal reasons. |
Re: Discussing JollaOy strategy
I actually spoken about similar problems Pango speaks about now on the sailfish-devel mailing list:
Quote:
It is still actual. But who at Jolla would care about that post at that time. There were already preparing for the "battle" and best strategy how to discredit me. The most important sentences in that above post are: On admitting mistakes and apologizing for them you can build community/clients trust and respect. Sadly they seem to miss that fact through most of the time. |
Re: Discussing JollaOy strategy
Quote:
Your case probably a prime example. ;) If someone wants to stop discussion, do it with great, opposition silencing arguments. Those are great. |
Re: Discussing JollaOy strategy
Quote:
Cybette's posting must have been true because I received my phone only a few days afterwards. Plus Stefano explained that they had a major database issue that caused all the delays and other so-called issues around the process. (While I would call it an issue if delivery doesn't start in the exact order of order entry.) You can still choose not to believe any of this. You can choose to assume they had all their phones packaged, stamped and piled up in Marc Dillons backyard and just deciced not to deliver them to make their own customers as unhappy as they can. In your mind, you probably see them all cheerful and relaxed, drinking champagne, laughing and making fun of the dumb customers who still wait for their phones. Both explanations are possible, the database corruption and the champagne scene. Which one you think was true is your choice. |
Re: Discussing JollaOy strategy
Quote:
|
Re: Discussing JollaOy strategy
Quote:
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/black-or-white |
Re: Discussing JollaOy strategy
So, lets see if a poll can bring light into this topic.
http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php...9&goto=newpost |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 15:06. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8