![]() |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
I assume, folks who knows about Maemo/MeeGo would at least praise the following when reviewing Sailfish OS: - The device is open to the user. SU access by default, no jainbreaking/root required to mod system. - Multitasking. The apps are running instead of tombstone. - No home button or navigation bar needed. A clean front face. Things like this is not UX related, but those who use major OSes will never know... |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
UX is not UI, which are the pretty ****ing pictures that make up a screen. The UX of terminal based (commandline) OS's require you type it in. That's a user expectation and experience. But even that stance is subjective. But allow me to explain my stance. To go further, you described the actual experience, ease of use, and expectations that exist in a system that does real multi-tasking, not serial-tasking. It is that there are no buttons (UI) or navigation (UI) to get in the way of the experience of using the applications on the device. UX is the form, the flow and the way that you interact with what's there and the approach therein... which, should not be based on whatever OS you're using. That's immaterial. It's how the user gets **** done; if they can and the allowable approaches therein. iOS serial tasks - unless you use their new split-screen that sorta does multi-tasking while killing all of the other apps in the background and allows only two at a time. Android does the same thing... split-screen and tombstones the rest. Desktop OS's do windowed multi-tasking, unless you use snap-to (edge, quadrants, etc.). And MeeGo/Sailfish do real multi-tasking where once it's minimized, it may still run if it's programmed to do so. But that's still part of the experience once it's been programmed to do so. And as it stands; a mobile OS is not a replacement for a "major OS" quite yet despite how much marketing tells me as such. And above all, what exists in a device should not require prior experience or knowledge. That is what really bothers me; people that all too quickly declare that any opinion is null and void unless they come from a similar background, exposure and expectations in regards to how they want a device, OS or much anything to work. It's far too myopic and limiting. Much like each and every device that ran Maemo, MeeGo and now... Sailfish. The world is bigger than the 10% that know a damn thing about Linux - embedded or desktop. I state all of the above just as part of a discussion; not as a condemnation of your take on what constitutes UX vs. UI. We see things differently and that's fine and I can appreciate your stance as it has a ton of merit. But as I stated earlier; I just have to kindly disagree. Do not take my statements personal. They were not meant to be taken in that manner. |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
|
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
One aspect is new sailfish users and "wannabe mainstream" reviewers washing on our shores, pointing out blind spots if you listen with an open mindset. |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
Interesting that jolla blog don't say more about Turing. |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
It is not that I don't know how it works, it is just that I don't operate the OS on the background in my mind while focusing on my creative process. And this is way beyond the trouble fake "ok but it is not AndroiOS and no 100k apps" kind of reviews. Obviously people at Jolla think alike seen the need to implement a version 2 of the UI and the un-skipable tutorial (that obviously does not help to make the experience more intuitive). Maemo on the N900 and the keyboard-less version on the N9 did need no explanation. N900 stands out as the device that felt like a relief to get to get to know and use and to return to. |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
|
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Here we go again... :D OS this, OS that...
I don't think it matters what jolla do with the OS. It will still be irrelevant until until it usable. OS is irrelevant nowdays. no matter what we all thinks. Time is changing. Its all about services. doesn't matter if you swipe, scroll, swipe, click, hover. Turing is not judged by its phone or its OS. If it cant use chromecast and cast Netflix the phone is broken. So maybe jolla should refund users and doing something that users like or doing something else. They cant live on 500 fanboys, some inverters money without growth which is pretty much zero since its impossible to buy jolla phones in most parts of the world. Poeple is ready to help, but not via scams...It must result in progress or poeple and investers will checkout. I'm ready to be supriced, and amazed by the irrelevant comments regarding the OS but Hope we will seen see more about the a actual device and turing adjustments. |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Dave, you are right but remember you are preaching to the crowd to whom the OS is everything. I know because I used to be like that too, until I realized the life is too short to constantly struggle with the OS when all you want to do is some basic thing like resize a photo.
|
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
Code:
[nemo@Sailfish ~]$ |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
(sorry, had to do it) |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
1920x1080 is 1.777777777... 190x100 is 1.9 178x97 is 1.835051546 So in my approach there is 10687ppm difference, and in your approach just 9687ppm difference... However to the naked eye both approaches give exactly the same result, there is around one pixels worth of difference in the end result :eek: |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
Perhaps I should revamp the navigation code in Saera. |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
If Jolla do, I might be back on Sailfish, but in the meantime I gave up fighting and I've been on Android for even the basic things (SIP, syncing, CalDAV, managing music, navigation, browsing) |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
If you are like me, there is no real alternative to SFOS, as Android just don't cut it; All my services are of the "i-made-it-myself-and-it-works-miracles-for-me" variety. |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
|
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
I'm not in fb, twitter, whatsapp, skype, linkedin... Instead I often go and visit my friends and occasionally have lunch/dinner/beer with them. Poor me, I have next to no social life it seems... |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
anyone have turing phone can share their default ambience?
|
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
|
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Now that everything went well with the Turing Phone, it's time to move on to something new! Deep learning, neural networks, graphene oxide, a hydrogen fuelcell, you know, stuff like that. It'll be out next year! When can we preorder?
http://us11.campaign-archive2.com/?u...e&e=10b5acf899 Edit: Sorry, didn't notice there's already another thread for this! |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Mans! Get your money an get ready to join the scam...
https://m.facebook.com/comment/repli...eWmlJ&refid=52 One month to go! EDIT: given that Jolla refund backers OC! ;) |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
shitstorm incoming :o
|
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-lT2ZlXp7_R...B3wnoburza.png We must inform Mosen. He is the only one that is planning to buy this ****. Who added these tags again? |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Interesting note, Jolla mentions Intex on Twitter but says nothing about Turing. Not even on their Facebook page.
|
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
|
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
|
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
|
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
I guess the number of phones shipped is still somewhere between 0 and 2?
|
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
As if there wasn't enough....
http://www.androidheadlines.com/2016...azy-phone.html Not even funny anymore... :) |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
It's time to say farewell to this scam. Let's move on.
|
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
The admittedly rather eccentric-looking Turing dude was on a Jolla dev-con video report. He seemed (at the same time) both sketchy and compelling.
Despite his wiffle and bluster, has anyone actually had their paws on a Turing blower? |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Nobody noticed the reference to Turing Phone on the last Sailfish SDK release note?
https://sailfishos.org/wiki/Applicat...ss_SDK_Release |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
The guy from twitter posted photos of his new turing device.
I asked wether it is the actual replacement unit with full specs. @Dynamite, any news on your front? |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
That's been hit by the bling stick so many times, natives of Essex would think twice about getting it out in public. |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
|
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
Still glad to see that someone seems to have gotten one. Would love to see it turned on and reviewed . . . And I really wonder just how many of these have shipped. No one seems to be dumping any on eBay. I would think that even if just hundreds have shipped, then at least one or two people would be disappointed at all the changes made since they bought in and dump it while the dumping's good. It really makes me think that the 8(?) we've seen are all there are. |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
|
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Nice!
You can easily make history by establishing the first ever ssh connection to a consumer ready turing phone :D :D :D |
Re: Sailfish on Turing Phones?
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 12:53. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8