Quote:
Originally Posted by karam
well that's a good point
however the last update was on 3 jan
and the creation if speedpatch was a result of testing
perhaps i have no huge expert to explain how it does that
but according to speedpatch testers .. it appeared that it does something
and i wouldn't take a chance a create a new thread (and it was my first thread i ever create) if i wasn't sure that cgroup patch does something
if you have noticed that the first versions were just scripts
not in devel
but after i got many requests uploading it devel .. had to do it
|
Which proves once again mine and many others point that you have absolutely no clue what your so called speedpatch is doing. And TBH what irritates me most is that you still refuse to google for linux kernel cgroups and educate yourself. Description is several pages long, go read it. Computer science , software development, you name it, is not alchemy or black magic, it is that - science and while six sense helps, one needs knowledge too.
Quote:
as for battery patch
.
.
.
in offline mode,device with KP49, underclock profile 125-600 has with vfs 10 and reniced processes
xx>mA with batterypatch than without it
of course the hard ware cannot be edited .. but N900 requires quite less battery life than without batterypatch
in that one overclock profile with conservative module
well got nothing to say about that but tests showed me it improves continues time of using
|
I still fail to see any hard values on current and/or battery life.
Quote:
may i ask you what kind of problem batterypatch may cause ?
ok i got that speedpatch can cause problems (although not with me)
thank you
|
Go read your own thread.