Thread
:
[Council] Should Tech Staff and/or Council Remove Dangerous Packages From Extras and Extras-Testing?
View Single Post
Estel
2013-04-01 , 20:51
Posts: 5,028 | Thanked: 8,613 times | Joined on Mar 2011
#
35
Last time I checked, general consensus was to revisit exact rules about things forbidden in packages, and giving time for developers to fix it, then starting to take action.
If you would care to read this (short) thread - it wasn't about those 2 packages, but about packages violating rules in general.
I'm also pretty sure, that Mentalist wrote exactly what he wanted to wrote, and doesn't need "correcting" to focus on witch-hunt for crapatches, only. Please, don't go deaf for Community suggestions - many wise ideas in this thread, and it would be pity to waste them, focusing *only*
__________________
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover
MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1
|
ereswap
|
bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!
Quote & Reply
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post:
Android_808
,
panjgoori
Estel
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Estel
Find all posts by Estel