Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 2,014 | Thanked: 1,581 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#1
http://www.boygeniusreport.com/2010/...february-2010/

Whahoo. 64GB storage on my n900 shortly
__________________
Class .. : Power Poster, Potential Coder
Humor .. : [*********] Alignment: Chaotic Evil
Patience : [***-------] Weapon(s): +2 Logic Mace
Agro ... : |*****-----] Relic(s) : G1, N900

 
Posts: 1,746 | Thanked: 2,100 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#2
The question becomes what the Linux community will do regarding SDXC.

Technically, a kernel patch would allow the N900 to support them, but the issue then falls over to MS pushing the patent-riddled ExFat as the standard filesystem.
 
Posts: 2,014 | Thanked: 1,581 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#3
Originally Posted by wmarone View Post
The question becomes what the Linux community will do regarding SDXC.

Technically, a kernel patch would allow the N900 to support them, but the issue then falls over to MS pushing the patent-riddled ExFat as the standard filesystem.
I would partition the card most likely 16/16 ext3 and vfat32
__________________
Class .. : Power Poster, Potential Coder
Humor .. : [*********] Alignment: Chaotic Evil
Patience : [***-------] Weapon(s): +2 Logic Mace
Agro ... : |*****-----] Relic(s) : G1, N900

 
Posts: 3,841 | Thanked: 1,079 times | Joined on Nov 2006
#4
Originally Posted by wmarone View Post
The question becomes what the Linux community will do regarding SDXC.

Technically, a kernel patch would allow the N900 to support them,
Not really. As for the larger size, unless they changed the lines around (unlikely, as SDXC-readers should be able to read SDHC/SD) the kernel can handle up to 2TB already.
But we're not sure yet of the electrical interface. At least there's 100MHz involved, which a kernel patch can't solve. But it could be that the cards may work in slower mode with the lower frequency of our hardware.

but the issue then falls over to MS pushing the patent-riddled ExFat as the standard filesystem.
Yes, but nothing stops us from using other filesystems.
__________________
N800/OS2007|N900/Maemo5
-- Metalayer-crawler delenda est.
-- Current state: Fed up with everything MeeGo.
 
AndrewG's Avatar
Posts: 257 | Thanked: 51 times | Joined on Dec 2009
#5
I've got to have one
Wonder what it'll cost me though :S
 
Posts: 1,746 | Thanked: 2,100 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#6
Originally Posted by TA-t3 View Post
But we're not sure yet of the electrical interface. At least there's 100MHz involved, which a kernel patch can't solve. But it could be that the cards may work in slower mode with the lower frequency of our hardware.
Which is pretty much what I'd expect. All the capacity, but none of the speed (sadly.) You'd need an external reader to put stuff on it, but after that standard SDHC speeds, if not slightly higher, would be fine for the N900.
 
R-R's Avatar
Posts: 739 | Thanked: 242 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ Montreal
#7
from : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SDXC#SDXC

SDHC devices will only support the SDXC cards which use UHS104 speeds;[31] SDHC devices will not recognize the SDXC cards which use the faster (SD 4.0), final-spec of SDXC.[43]

which may imply only 32GB sdxc card support... which is probably going to be a PITA if it was like those 4GB SD vs SDHC cards.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:18.