Page 6 of 6 « First 45 6
Reply
Thread Tools
paulkoan is offline paulkoan
2010-03-31 , 02:25
Posts: 422 | Thanked: 244 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#51
Originally Posted by paulkoan View Post
Yeah, multitouch would be great, but not at the expense of no or inaccurate stylus use.
Unless it was a finger-only screen and they came up with a clever way of doing pixel level accuracy. I am imagining a mouse cursor that appears just above (vertically on the screen) where you are touching, so you can see it, and a screen tap would be a click where the cursor was, not where your finger was.

And you'd have to extend the touch screen below the bottom of the lcd (make that amoled thanks).
__________________
Servwise Advanced Hosting - Better, Faster, Smarter
Hum Consulting - IT and Marketing services to sing about
 
Laughing Man is offline Laughing Man
2010-03-31 , 02:33
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#52
Originally Posted by paulkoan View Post
Unless it was a finger-only screen and they came up with a clever way of doing pixel level accuracy. I am imagining a mouse cursor that appears just above (vertically on the screen) where you are touching, so you can see it, and a screen tap would be a click where the cursor was, not where your finger was.

And you'd have to extend the touch screen below the bottom of the lcd (make that amoled thanks).
I agree, the only way I could consider switching to a capacitative touchscreen is if they did something like this to make up for the loss in accuracy.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
 
Reply
Page 6 of 6 « First 45 6

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:18.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top