Active Topics

 


Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 13 | Thanked: 4 times | Joined on Dec 2010
#1
i am getting the following error when i try to flash my device

Code:
flasher v2.5.2 (Oct 21 2009)

SW version in image: RX-51_2009SE_20.2010.36-2.004_PR_004
Image 'kernel', size 1705 kB
	Version 2.6.28-20103103+0m5
Image 'rootfs', size 185600 kB
	Version RX-51_2009SE_20.2010.36-2.004_PR_004
Invalid FIASCO subimage id (6e)
 
Posts: 1,994 | Thanked: 3,342 times | Joined on Jun 2010 @ N900: Battery low. N950: torx 4 re-used once and fine; SIM port torn apart
#2
Originally Posted by fizmhd View Post
i am getting the following error when i try to flash my device

Code:
flasher v2.5.2 (Oct 21 2009)

SW version in image: RX-51_2009SE_20.2010.36-2.004_PR_004
Image 'kernel', size 1705 kB
	Version 2.6.28-20103103+0m5
Image 'rootfs', size 185600 kB
	Version RX-51_2009SE_20.2010.36-2.004_PR_004
Invalid FIASCO subimage id (6e)
Are you sure the file wasn't corrupted while downloading?
http://www.brijin.net/flashing-nokia-n900-in-ubuntu/
 
Posts: 73 | Thanked: 47 times | Joined on Aug 2010
#3
Just a suggestion: check your regional code under the battery and search again for a proper image.

Flasher-3.5 has been out long ago, why do you use an older version anyway?

Are you cleaning up your baby for the new year

Happy New Year
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Duy2anh For This Useful Post:
Posts: 13 | Thanked: 4 times | Joined on Dec 2010
#4
Originally Posted by Duy2anh View Post
Just a suggestion: check your regional code under the battery and search again for a proper image.

Flasher-3.5 has been out long ago, why do you use an older version anyway?

Are you cleaning up your baby for the new year

Happy New Year
well ..i use the latest flasher i just used 3.5 ...only this is the output that i get on the screen ....

well ..let me download the firmware again and seee...

thanks for the help

happy new year ...
 

The Following User Says Thank You to fizmhd For This Useful Post:
Posts: 2,102 | Thanked: 1,937 times | Joined on Sep 2008 @ Berlin, Germany
#5
There is nothing wrong with this version of flasher3.5, it issues this flasher v.2.5.2 always.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to michaaa62 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 73 | Thanked: 47 times | Joined on Aug 2010
#6
Originally Posted by michaaa62 View Post
There is nothing wrong with this version of flasher3.5, it issues this flasher v.2.5.2 always.
I did not notice that when I reflashed mine. Sorry.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:48.