![]() |
2010-01-25
, 20:43
|
Posts: 472 |
Thanked: 442 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
|
#2
|
![]() |
2010-01-25
, 20:49
|
|
Posts: 327 |
Thanked: 249 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Λεμεσιανός, ρε!
|
#3
|
![]() |
2010-01-25
, 20:53
|
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Denver, CO USA
|
#4
|
Edge is fast enough for me so no. I've done plenty of work over Edge without issue. Only reason for 3G that I can think of is if you want to stream videos a lot, which I don't care about.
![]() |
2010-01-25
, 20:55
|
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Denver, CO USA
|
#5
|
![]() |
2010-01-25
, 20:57
|
Posts: 472 |
Thanked: 442 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
|
#6
|
I just tried sending an picture through mail (was about 1MB), I was in a place with sketchy 3G. It took forever to send the mail.
Also for web browsing... don't you feel the diff?
![]() |
2010-01-25
, 20:57
|
Posts: 518 |
Thanked: 160 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#7
|
![]() |
2010-01-25
, 21:08
|
Posts: 59 |
Thanked: 11 times |
Joined on Feb 2006
@ Helsinki, Finland
|
#8
|
![]() |
2010-01-25
, 21:12
|
Posts: 188 |
Thanked: 34 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
|
#9
|
I run into some QoS issues on AT&T's Edge, with Skype and my SIP client, as well as streaming internet radio, despite being in a "full signal" region. If and when there is any sling support for the 900, I can't imagine it being sufficient.
As stated, I fare better on T-Mo's 3G.
![]() |
2010-01-25
, 21:18
|
Posts: 56 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Spokane, WA
|
#10
|
But for me it was always so. I changed to TMo from ATT just because I wanted the N900 and HD2. So my question is, is 3G for you guys a deal breaker. if not why?
PS:- For me though it seams black and white. I get about 1.5 Mbps constant now I can't get anything close to that with EDGE so how this not be a deal breaker?