|
|
2011-05-27
, 19:20
|
|
|
Posts: 551 |
Thanked: 507 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ North West England
|
#212
|
I believe, however, that a more refined question may yield some results because without more focus and weight
The reqest could be refined by breaking it down into a list of the areas of functionality where source code or system-access is necessary i.e What source should be released. Many items on this list exist as wontfix and open on the Maemo bug site. For each item on the list there needs to be an associated:
- Why
- How
- To whom
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to JohnLF For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-05-28
, 01:19
|
|
|
Posts: 187 |
Thanked: 96 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ London, UK
|
#213
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to fasza2 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-05-28
, 01:47
|
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#215
|
Very eloquent and well thought out post. Perhaps we should leave this an an exercise for the OP as he feels so strongly about it.
Abill - would you like to go through the buglist and identify a list of sourcecode items you would like to see released, in order of priority, with reasoned arguments as to why, how and to whom?
|
|
2011-05-28
, 01:58
|
|
|
Posts: 549 |
Thanked: 698 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#216
|
|
|
2011-05-28
, 02:04
|
|
Banned |
Posts: 3,412 |
Thanked: 1,043 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#217
|
You are our self proclaimed leader so step up to the plate and go through the buglist and identify a list of sourcecode items you would like to see released, in order of priority, with reasoned arguments as to why, how and to whom.
That is actual work you know, something that takes time, effort and might result with something useful, not this dumb to oblivion poll of yours.
Pretty please.
|
|
2011-05-28
, 02:17
|
|
|
Posts: 11,700 |
Thanked: 10,045 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ North Texas, USA
|
#219
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Texrat For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2011-05-28
, 02:19
|
|
Posts: 1,225 |
Thanked: 1,905 times |
Joined on Feb 2011
@ Quezon City, Philippines
|
#220
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| current, daddys ketchup, flog dead horse, give him, just shoot me, must not say no, no argue ok, play nice, situation, yes or highway |
| Thread Tools | |
|
Instead of pushing for the obviously impossible, a better use of this community's time would be to push for documentation that was previously scarce or to push a few capable individuals into the yes-list to add a few things.
It wouldn't violate any individuality of Nokia UI if a few people (or even one) could make small patches to closed source bits to allow interoperability with open software. Especially unofficial, unsupported patches.
I'm just throwing an example here (since I can't code for Linux); Phone loading its face from file, so the look can be configurable. Or a few lines that allows replacing alarm UI.
Since I'm shooting blind here, I don't know if it's not a matter of overwriting a binary to replace that joke that rings when alarms happen. It chokes, it cuts alarm short, it dies if overlapped, etc. It's just a window.
I'm just saying, one MAG on the right list is worth 50 million "yes" and "no" in this poll. Heck, 10 bucks in a donation is probably worth more. Heck, one thank you is likely to be worth more.
N900 dead and Nokia no longer replaces them. Thanks for all the fish.
Keep the forums clean: use "Thanks" button instead of the thank you post.