Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    The EPIC N9 anticipation thread

    Reply
    Page 331 of 736 | Prev | 321   329     330   331   332     333   341 | Next | Last
    skidrock | # 3301 | 2011-06-01, 05:51 | Report

    Originally Posted by bhairav View Post
    guys its over nokia phones division purchased by ms last week as quoted by eldar now not intrested in n9 nor meego or nokia
    Bhairav, is there any solid proof for your claim ? Can you post any link you might have ?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    dtergens | # 3302 | 2011-06-01, 05:58 | Report

    I really wonder wich will be the first created, N9/950 or first WP7 ? ... http://www.marketwire.com/press-rele...1v-1520455.htm

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    zehjotkah | # 3303 | 2011-06-01, 06:25 | Report

    Originally Posted by onethreealpha View Post
    of ineterest is that nokia's rm device info slated for public release by the FCC (the hwkb "dev" device) in June has another device (from memory rm_744 or rm-745) slated to come out of confidentiality clause @ 21July. could this be the candybar consumer device.
    I'm at work so can't dig up much info on this rm-744 (or could be rm-745).......
    would make sense to release the dev hardware a month before the consumer device
    http://mynokiablog.com/2011/03/06/no...proved-by-fcc/

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to zehjotkah For This Useful Post:
    Brock, Helmuth, onethreealpha, victorevo, WilliePre

     
    raghu_mark | # 3304 | 2011-06-01, 06:44 | Report

    Originally Posted by bhairav View Post
    guys its over nokia phones division purchased by ms last week as quoted by eldar now not intrested in n9 nor meego or nokia
    Stop believing everything that eldar says. More than in one instance, i have found his statements to be false.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to raghu_mark For This Useful Post:
    Brock, zehjotkah

     
    keithzg | # 3305 | 2011-06-01, 06:52 | Report

    Hmm only a 1050 mAh battery? Well, on the one hand that seems a bit low, but on the other hand I can see why (for a "consumer device") they'd want it to be as slim as possible, and batteries can be a big issue for that. Plus I wouldn't discount the possibility of some rather improved power management (I mean, my sister's N8 has a smaller capacity battery than my N900 from what I remember, but I carry a spare and for hers it isn't an issue, so definitely one can offset battery capacity).

    That being said, I wouldn't at all be surprised if the rm-745 turned out to be a Symbian^3 device, considering (as stated) it has the same battery as the C5. Although to temper my skepticism, the N900's battery is the same as the 5230 (for those not familiar, it's a contemporary-to-the-N900 low-end Symbian touchscreen) so maybe I shouldn't be so doubtful.

    Always important to stick as close to what we directly know, and to treat our assumptions and hypotheses as what they are, mere conjecture. That is to say, the FCC confidentiality times can't expire fast enough

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    nowhereman | # 3306 | 2011-06-01, 07:46 | Report

    Originally Posted by dtergens View Post
    I really wonder wich will be the first created, N9/950 or first WP7 ? ... http://www.marketwire.com/press-rele...1v-1520455.htm
    the first will be .....


    WP7 :-(

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to nowhereman For This Useful Post:
    dtergens

     
    zehjotkah | # 3307 | 2011-06-01, 07:58 | Report

    Originally Posted by dtergens View Post
    I really wonder wich will be the first created, N9/950 or first WP7 ? ... http://www.marketwire.com/press-rele...1v-1520455.htm
    the Harmattan device will be first.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to zehjotkah For This Useful Post:
    Brock, dtergens, jakiman, Jedibeeftrix, mece, nwerneck, victorevo

     
    kanishou | # 3308 | 2011-06-01, 08:50 | Report

    Some general responses to MoJo's wall of text:

    - The upcoming device is what Nokia until recently was betting the farm on. No reductions have taken place and it is still the same device, so you can imagine the scope of it. Not releasing it now to support the WP7 strategy would be ridiculous and obviously won't happen.

    - MeeGo was supposed to replace Symbian as Nokia's primary smartphone platform. This has changed now, and instead WP7 will take this role, but that does not mean that there is no room for MeeGo any longer. WP7 is a safe bet for a wide range of phones, but that does not exclude the possibility of the occasional MeeGo speciality device.

    - Hardly any phone maker who uses third party operating systems limits themselves to a single OS, even if they have a strong preference. Why should Nokia be different, even if the partnership with Microsoft is unique.

    - Elop decided against MeeGo as the primary platform not because of the (lack of) potential he saw in the software, but because he (probably rightfully so) decided that the ecosystem is more important than the software itself. Buyers want "apps", and competing with the three mammoths iPhone (with its gigantic mindshare and largest number of apps), Android (with Google's crazy infrastructure and services) and WP7 (with Microsoft's money, infrastructure, and developer base) would have been incredibly hard.

    Joining one of these ecosystems has many benefits, but unfortunately requires also adopting one of the operating systems. It would have made little difference to use Android over WP7, only that WP7 in my mind is clearly the more exciting platform. While it still lacks quite a bit, it makes sense to me that Nokia and Microsoft together feel confident that they are able to get it into shape before Nokia alone would have been able to deliver both a competitive OS with MeeGo _and_ finally get their ecosystem to be competitive (not to mention convince enough developers to support this new platform, which has changed so frequently in recent times).

    Does this suck for us? Obviously. But we won't be able to do better if we don't look at things realistically. It is too easy to dismiss WP7 as yet another worthless Windows, or Elop as a Microsoft trojan horse. Both are very obvious conclusions to draw, but from what I can tell, don't appear to be true.

    Ultimately, like others have said, a healthy Nokia that supports MeeGo and open source to some extend is still better for us than a deathly-sick Nokia that is fully committed to MeeGo.

    Also, if Intel doesn't like it they can shove it and we just give it a different name. What matters in the end is that in not such a long time from now, the smartphone world will be richer for one exciting open platform (this time it's no hacker's toy like Fremantle was), and one amazing device.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to kanishou For This Useful Post:
    afaq, AndyNokia232, ARJWright, dtergens, Helmuth, jakiman, Kozzi, misterc, nwerneck, OVK, rainmaster, RAZOR, Stonik

     
    aironeous | # 3309 | 2011-06-01, 08:52 | Report

    some meego conference highlights
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oG1eZX33ag0

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    jo21 | # 3310 | 2011-06-01, 08:54 | Report

    nokia elop just went for the higher bidder.

    WP7 its a sales failure.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Page 331 of 736 | Prev | 321   329     330   331   332     333   341 | Next | Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout