Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    Hacking with Maemo to cut users off network

    Reply
    Page 3 of 6 | Prev |   1     2   3   4     5   | Next | Last
    laasonen | # 21 | 2011-06-02, 04:58 | Report

    Originally Posted by Mentalist Traceur View Post
    laasonen:

    If you've used airmon-ng to make a mon0 interface, your wlan0 interface is still in normal managed mode, and you should use "mon0" as the interface over which to inject and capture packets, etc.

    Also, you need to have iw installed in order to use airmon-ng (without it, airmon-ng doesn't work, and instead of getting a convenient mon0 interface, you have to manually put wlan0 into monitor mode using iwconfig). iw, however, currently conflicts with aircrack-ng. I've removed the conflict in iw's control file, but can't get iw to build right in the autobuilder yet, so in the meantime, there's a .deb I've precompiled in the [Announce] Aircrack-NG 1.1 thread, about 30-or-so posts in, that you can install instead of the iw in the repositories, which doesn't conflict with the aircrack-ng in the repository.
    Thanks.
    You or someone seem to have typed "sleep 1s" instead of "sleep 1" somewhere :/

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Mentalist Traceur | # 22 | 2011-06-02, 05:36 | Report

    Originally Posted by laasonen View Post
    Thanks.
    You or someone seem to have typed "sleep 1s" instead of "sleep 1" somewhere :/
    I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "sleep 1s" instead of "sleep 1"? What are you referring to?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    laasonen | # 23 | 2011-06-02, 06:07 | Report

    Originally Posted by Mentalist Traceur View Post
    I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "sleep 1s" instead of "sleep 1"? What are you referring to?
    This error:
    Code:
    Nokia-N900:~# airmon-ng start wlan0
    
    
    Interface	Chipset		Driver
    
    wlan0		TI WL1251	wl12xx - [phy0]sleep: invalid number '1s'
    
    				(monitor mode enabled on mon0)
    
    Nokia-N900:~#

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Mentalist Traceur | # 24 | 2011-06-02, 06:14 | Report

    Oh, that. I don't know what that's about, and mine gives me the same error all the time, but notice the part where it says "(monitor mode enabled on mon0)"? That means it worked. If you run iwconfig or ifconfig you will now see a mon0 interface in monitor mode.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    laasonen | # 25 | 2011-06-02, 06:16 | Report

    Originally Posted by Mentalist Traceur View Post
    Oh, that. I don't know what that's about, and mine gives me the same error all the time, but notice the part where it says "(monitor mode enabled on mon0)"? That means it worked. If you run iwconfig or ifconfig you will now see a mon0 interface in monitor mode.
    Yes, I have been using it over hour now without problems

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    ScottishDuck | # 26 | 2011-06-02, 06:21 | Report

    It's definitely summer, the script kiddies are out from school.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to ScottishDuck For This Useful Post:
    smartypants

     
    dchky | # 27 | 2011-06-02, 08:26 | Report

    Originally Posted by karam View Post
    Correct i saw it funny cause i use mitm a lot
    and using it to cut users off is funny for me
    A punch in the mouth is sometimes funny to see as well, what you are doing is called "denial of service" - most countries have laws covering exactly this type of activity. You disrupt other users of a system that you don't even own - Why?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dchky For This Useful Post:
    JonWW, ScottishDuck

     
    laasonen | # 28 | 2011-06-02, 08:36 | Report

    Originally Posted by dchky View Post
    A punch in the mouth is sometimes funny to see as well, what you are doing is called "denial of service" - most countries have laws covering exactly this type of activity. You disrupt other users of a system that you don't even own - Why?
    Blocking file sharers from public wlans when they are jamming the whole station would be useful Not not necessarily legal, but what are you going to

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    karam | # 29 | 2011-06-02, 08:38 | Report

    Maybe and i don't use dos attake to bother people i just use it to cut of the internet from my brother computer so he goes to study

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to karam For This Useful Post:
    pursueky

     
    unkle_p | # 30 | 2011-06-02, 08:57 | Report

    In my uni in Thailand, this would also be useful for kicking out users who suck up the bandwidth with their downloads. They screw things for the rest of us.

    Peoples concepts of illegality are classified in psychology. Don't because they say so is one step up from I can do it because I have the power. A real healthy approach would be understanding the functions a law serves, and following the law based on our perception of the function that the law is serving.

    The European union just banned mint, with a whole bunch of other medicinal plants. The ban originated from business interests, which is the function that the ban serves. If you disagree with the function, it is better to ignore one law, then to loose trust in the concept of law and community at a larger scale.

    These issues are based on the social contract, a concept people would do well to relearn.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Social_Contract

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to unkle_p For This Useful Post:
    fasza2, pavlik

     
    Page 3 of 6 | Prev |   1     2   3   4     5   | Next | Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout