| The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to qole For This Useful Post: | ||
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to johnel For This Useful Post: | ||
| The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to vi_ For This Useful Post: | ||
And how you know that I've listened to few albums of Johnny Cash today?
)? By "final quality", I mean (as objective as it can be) usefulness, ease of creation UI for programs that keep style/habits of base system UI, possibility of using with capacitive screens, as mentioned by qole...| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post: | ||

After reading this quoted part of qole's post, I thought that he mean we can't do anything without Nokia. Ho ever, qole clarified what he meant, and he's far from thinking like that. If I understand correctly, he mean that our new "entity" won't be *literally* Maemo anymore - for many reasons, not to mention that we can't use this name, cause Nokia won't give it to us - but, that's still not big deal.
). The thing is to remain "devoted" to our goals about open mobile system, easy adaptable and one, that we can port linux packages relatively easy.
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to qwazix For This Useful Post: | ||
)? By "final quality", I mean (as objective as it can be) usefulness, ease of creation UI for programs that keep style/habits of base system UI, possibility of using with capacitive screens, as mentioned by qole...| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to tekki For This Useful Post: | ||