Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    [ANNOUNCE] COMPCACHE on kernel-power (now with notifications)

    Reply
    Page 2 of 29 | Prev |   1   2   3     4   12 | Next | Last
    Gusse | # 11 | 2011-08-27, 17:38 | Report

    First expression is very positive
    After short usage, I would say that device is a bit more responsive (my subjective judgement) under heavy load (multiple application running simultaneously).

    Thanks for bringing this option to Maemo!

    EDIT: After some usage I see problems, device start to lag and eventually does not respond at all, need a reboot.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by Gusse; 2011-08-27 at 18:57.
    The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Gusse For This Useful Post:
    aanckar, fasza2, fw190, mrsellout, reinob, Zentenario

     
    pantera1989 | # 12 | 2011-08-27, 17:42 | Report

    Originally Posted by Seker_94 View Post
    freemangordon what will this do to our N900 ?
    Hopefully it will make the N900 more responsive or more likely it would take it more time to start lagging. The worst thing that could happen would be frequent random reboots. However a reflash will solve anything. If you are afraid to try it first backup using backupmenu and then try the patch.

    So far I am not seeing much difference to be honest..although it hasn't been long.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to pantera1989 For This Useful Post:
    moepda

     
    freemangordon | # 13 | 2011-08-27, 18:16 | Report

    Originally Posted by pantera1989 View Post
    Hopefully it will make the N900 more responsive or more likely it would take it more time to start lagging. The worst thing that could happen would be frequent random reboots. However a reflash will solve anything. If you are afraid to try it first backup using backupmenu and then try the patch.

    So far I am not seeing much difference to be honest..although it hasn't been long.
    Make sure your compcache swap has higher priority than internal flash swap i.e. when cat /proc/swaps ramzswap has higher priority value than mmcblk0p3

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post:
    pantera1989

     
    mesho123 | # 14 | 2011-08-27, 18:40 | Report

    what is compcache do ?

    it's useful to install ?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    ade | # 15 | 2011-08-27, 18:43 | Report

    Originally Posted by freemangordon View Post
    Make sure your compcache swap has higher priority than internal flash swap i.e. when cat /proc/swaps ramzswap has higher priority value than mmcblk0p3
    Higher priority value meaning closer to zero I guess?
    Ramzswap0 was filled first after reboot, so that looks okay.

    Curious to see how it's going to behave in terms of cpu/battery costs and performance wise after a period of time...

    Code:
    cat /proc/swaps
    Filename                                Type            Size    Used    Priority
    /dev/mmcblk0p3                          partition       786424  57804   -2
    /dev/ramzswap0                          partition       131064  130728  -1

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    evan | # 16 | 2011-08-27, 19:05 | Report

    I am installing right now..
    should we be more careful with compcache enabled about swappiness value? a value of 100 would make the cpu compressing data all the time?
    edit: installed with priorities correct!. testing begins..

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by evan; 2011-08-27 at 19:31.

     
    moepda | # 17 | 2011-08-27, 19:10 | Report

    so once ive installed the .debs and added the .ko , what exactly do i do next ? and how do i do it? sorry for sounding somewhat uninformed

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Seker_94 | # 18 | 2011-08-27, 19:17 | Report

    Originally Posted by freemangordon View Post
    Make sure your compcache swap has higher priority than internal flash swap i.e. when cat /proc/swaps ramzswap has higher priority value than mmcblk0p3
    and how can we do that ?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Estel | # 19 | 2011-08-27, 19:27 | Report

    disable and enable again "regular" swap - as one turned on later, it will have lesser priority.

    Another approach is to get swqapon from - for example - debian - it have setting priority ( - p ) working, unlike vanilla maemo swapon.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    TMavica | # 20 | 2011-08-27, 19:41 | Report

    cat /proc/swaps , i cant find the ramswap drive

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Page 2 of 29 | Prev |   1   2   3     4   12 | Next | Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout