The Following User Says Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-10-05
, 20:21
|
Posts: 658 |
Thanked: 777 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Norway
|
#2
|
|
2011-10-05
, 20:52
|
Posts: 140 |
Thanked: 66 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
|
#3
|
|
2011-10-05
, 20:52
|
Posts: 322 |
Thanked: 305 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Espoo, Finland
|
#4
|
The Following User Says Thank You to bbin For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2011-10-05
, 20:54
|
Posts: 658 |
Thanked: 777 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Norway
|
#5
|
|
2011-10-05
, 20:57
|
Posts: 322 |
Thanked: 305 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Espoo, Finland
|
#6
|
|
2011-10-05
, 20:59
|
Posts: 658 |
Thanked: 777 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Norway
|
#7
|
|
2011-10-05
, 21:00
|
Posts: 322 |
Thanked: 305 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
@ Espoo, Finland
|
#8
|
|
2011-10-05
, 21:43
|
Posts: 658 |
Thanked: 777 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Norway
|
#10
|
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to slai For This Useful Post: | ||
But I'm keen to debate & learn lots more.
Some background reading to get this ball rolling...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_UMTS_networks
Blokes analysis of N9's antenna (cant fin orig. article yet, think it was telenor)
http://translate.google.com/translat...ntenne&act=url
*UPDATE*
Changed the thread title in order to broaden the focus of this thread.
We can now debate wireless performance/reliability for: Cellular/GPS/WiFi/BT.
Not sure we should get into BT profiles though, mainly just reception quality/strength.
Last edited by jalyst; 2011-12-05 at 09:51.