karam | # 2751 | 2011-12-01, 20:55 | Report

NEW UPDATE FOR speedpatch/batterypatch/batterypatch-non-kp

speedpatch : fixed the problem of uninstallation

batterypatch: in short A HUGE IMPROVEMENT
BUT i need someone to confirm that the new update has no problems at all (must be on it's way to extras-devel)
it's all KP version compatible + 720watch/record
changelog : http://maemo.org/packages/package_in...tterypatch/2.5

batterypatch-non-kp : fixed a tiny problem


good night all . wish me luck for my school test physiology

and i will edit the 1st post tomorrow

---

Last edited by karam; 2011-12-01 at 21:34.

romiiio | # 2752 | 2011-12-01, 21:20 | Report

[QUOTE

good night all . wish me luck for my school test physiology

and i will edit the 1st post tomorrow[/QUOTE]

thanks karam!
good luck for your test!!!

Zekahz | # 2753 | 2011-12-01, 21:40 | Report

Karam.. when I open the overclock file in kernelpowersettings I still see the freqs 700 and 750

I installed the new speedpatch & batterypatch

Mohammad | # 2754 | 2011-12-01, 22:25 | Report

what kp version are you using ?
i did't try the update yet

EDIT: WORKING AWESOME ON MY SIDE

thank you karam thank you vvery much
will now test the batt life time

---

Last edited by Mohammad; 2011-12-01 at 22:43.

Masoi | # 2755 | 2011-12-02, 02:16 | Report

i just installed battery patch and i notice that the frequency was always change even if i used.. the freq was stay at 500 - 600 when not locked... i dont know what is the problem..

peter2p | # 2756 | 2011-12-02, 06:37 | Report

Did the update last night, both battery patch and speed patch.
No problems here, battery lost about 10% overnight
I have the latest CSSU 1.1 and kernel V49 installed
Thx Karam

Edit; After testing a few days noticed that the update for batterypatch
is decreasing the battery much faster than after the previous update.
Even tried to set the values to 0 in carbonjha's post but it didn't help.
Reinstalled batterypatch and everything seems back to normal now

---

Last edited by peter2p; 2011-12-04 at 19:55.

carbonjha | # 2757 | 2011-12-02, 07:35 | Report

@karam
thanks a lot for the update

I think it is important to renice the processes of cpu_sleep back to 0 in cpu_normal
otherwise their nice value will always remain 1 & the processes will be ignored during cpu load

/opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_normal
@All
qtlockscreen users can test this

add this line in /opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_sleep
this will increase the priority of qtlockscreen when using


and in /opt/dbus-scripts/cpu_normal
this will decrease the priority of qtlockscreen when screen is unlocked

---

Last edited by carbonjha; 2011-12-03 at 04:01.

ed_boner | # 2758 | 2011-12-02, 13:01 | Report

i was using kp49 with no patch only dsp profile and was really happy with it...last night i installed this patches..i do not have any monitoring tool but my n900 imediately seemed faster...as for the battery i believe it is much worse than without batterypatch and dsp profile..is this possible?

msa | # 2759 | 2011-12-02, 17:19 | Report

when i try apt-get install speedpatch, i get the error "E: Couldn't find package speedpatch" :O

mohd012z | # 2760 | 2011-12-02, 18:53 | Report

so now what is the correct and stable overclock and underclock?.......