|
|
2007-12-23
, 16:40
|
|
Posts: 67 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#22
|
|
|
2007-12-23
, 17:18
|
|
Posts: 6 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#23
|
|
|
2007-12-23
, 17:32
|
|
|
Posts: 21 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Jan 2007
|
#24
|
|
|
2007-12-23
, 17:41
|
|
Posts: 79 |
Thanked: 4 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#25
|
I totally agree with you ArgentSilver. I don't know where Nokia's R&D had their head's when they didn't include a simple PIM.
|
|
2007-12-23
, 17:47
|
|
Posts: 6 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#26
|
|
|
2007-12-23
, 17:49
|
|
Posts: 67 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#27
|
The real probability of why there isn't a built in PIM suite is the Nokia didn't want to pay to develop one. Probably a money/cost thing. They assumed that since it was easy to develop for the tablets (since they aren't locked down software wise) that others would jump in and fill this--let's all notice how crappy the email client that's built in is--basically they put out the minimal configuration they could.
The basic problem is no one has really jumped in and made programs that are very robust. Again, probably an economic thing since you won't really make money off of the programs easily. So unless we all scrape together some cash and get a programmer to build it we'll just have to wait until the ones that do exist slowly get better.
|
|
2007-12-23
, 18:02
|
|
|
Posts: 1,674 |
Thanked: 171 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Anderson, IN
|
#28
|
|
|
2007-12-23
, 18:20
|
|
Posts: 67 |
Thanked: 6 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#29
|
|
|
2007-12-23
, 18:24
|
|
Posts: 259 |
Thanked: 72 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Halifax, NS
|
#30
|
my problems with garnet vm is that as far as for contacts , i dont want to have to click on garnet then click on contacts , i want it right on my desktop so one click and its open.... also , there are several palm apps that id love to use , as i still have an old sony clie around somewhere , but i dont want to have the whole palm interface up there with the little writing area and all.
I don't agree with the end result but I agree with their approach. They needed to carve a new niche and ensure there weren't any blurred lines or it'd be doomed. If it was too close to a PDA, PDAs would smite it. Too close to a phone, phones would smite it.
The N810 is the third step of five, I think once we get to step five we might see inherent PIM functionality as the product will have matured itself enough and "internet tablet" will have entered our collective psyche.
(A Jeep Cherokee was just a Jeep until Subaru called a station wagon a Sport Utility Vehicle.)