| The Following User Says Thank You to smph For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-04-25
, 08:33
|
|
Posts: 951 |
Thanked: 2,344 times |
Joined on Jan 2012
@ UK
|
#362
|
|
|
2012-04-25
, 11:54
|
|
Posts: 48 |
Thanked: 31 times |
Joined on Dec 2011
|
#363
|
It all depends on silicon everyone is going to have different results it's like a lottery of who has the better silicon chip!
| The Following User Says Thank You to smph For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-04-25
, 14:46
|
|
Posts: 110 |
Thanked: 62 times |
Joined on Mar 2012
|
#364
|
|
|
2012-04-25
, 14:49
|
|
|
Posts: 2,021 |
Thanked: 1,060 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ Hong Kong
|
#365
|
|
|
2012-04-25
, 15:38
|
|
Posts: 1,539 |
Thanked: 1,604 times |
Joined on Oct 2011
@ With my N9
|
#366
|
|
|
2012-04-25
, 15:52
|
|
Posts: 245 |
Thanked: 915 times |
Joined on Feb 2012
|
#367
|
Sad... If I do a 3$ donation i'm sure my bank will take 3-4€ of charges :/
|
|
2012-04-25
, 16:21
|
|
Posts: 1,463 |
Thanked: 1,916 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Edmonton, AB
|
#368
|
Are you implying that the actual voltage is the one given by the dyn_nominal variable? From what I've read that's not the case, dyn_nominal is the voltage at which SmartReflex starts a new round of calibration and lowers from there if possible. The idea is that dyn_nominal is a stable voltage for that particular chip in all conditions, including after deterioration due to aging and at high temperature.
I can't actually set the voltage lower than the default calib voltage, so if I'm right undervolting is not possible, in fact, at least not with the current method.
| The Following User Says Thank You to Creamy Goodness For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2012-04-25
, 17:04
|
|
Posts: 1,539 |
Thanked: 1,604 times |
Joined on Oct 2011
@ With my N9
|
#369
|
|
|
2012-04-25
, 17:12
|
|
Posts: 93 |
Thanked: 85 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
@ Halifax
|
#370
|
I can't actually set the voltage lower than the default calib voltage, so if I'm right undervolting is not possible, in fact, at least not with the current method.