|
|
2008-01-05
, 17:41
|
|
Posts: 835 |
Thanked: 772 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ Finland
|
#12
|
which is a shame.|
|
2008-01-06
, 01:53
|
|
Posts: 57 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#13
|
|
|
2008-01-06
, 05:46
|
|
Posts: 6 |
Thanked: 1 time |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#14
|
|
|
2008-01-06
, 07:13
|
|
|
Posts: 182 |
Thanked: 46 times |
Joined on Jan 2007
@ Silly-Con Valley
|
#15
|
|
|
2008-01-06
, 07:18
|
|
|
Posts: 716 |
Thanked: 236 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#16
|
|
|
2008-01-06
, 11:33
|
|
Posts: 57 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#17
|
I work with the two guys who won the prize. They each run Mac OS on mac hardware (one also runs Debian). What they wanted was the prize money and the challenge of doing it. Neither one of them will come near a win box. But you are right they wanted Nice software on nice hardware. Hopefully the updates of Leopard will go smooth.
|
|
2008-01-06
, 15:24
|
|
Posts: 171 |
Thanked: 7 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
|
#18
|
|
|
2008-01-06
, 15:53
|
|
Posts: 356 |
Thanked: 231 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#19
|
|
|
2008-01-06
, 16:41
|
|
|
Posts: 3,220 |
Thanked: 326 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
|
#20
|
I don't know if one is actually available as open source or not, but there IS something already working under Linux on the PepperPad 3: it's a composite video out port (looks like a headphone jack).
If the source is available for that, presumably it shouldn't be that hard to get a USB video out driver working.
R.
==
Here's the other half.
<rant>Eleven years ago I bought an early Palm Pilot. Like the N810, it was a full-blown useful computer with free support tools for application development. Like the N810, it attracted a supportive volunteer community, and many useful apps were developed (including this one of mine).
The difference, so far, is that both Palm apps and third-party apps had a consistent, friendly user interface and user experience. (To be fair, it's not clear whether that was because of the example of the Palm apps and the discipline imposed by the Palm OS, or because the platform just didn't support apps large enough to be confusing.)
Be that as it may, the Nokia IT line does not pay enough attention to the details of the user experience. Who hasn't accidentally dragged a home screen widget out of position? That gives as bad an impression as a flimsy build (not a problem here) or including a soft-sided case with a touch screen device (did the person who made that decision ever pocket an N810?).
The N810 is a great little computer. I have owned four Palms since my original Palm Pilot, and the N810 is the first non-Palm I've bought.
If it is going to be around in some incarnation ten years from now, it will need a base of less sophisticated users to keep buying it. So far it is not quite ready to attract those users, and will not do that until Nokia makes the user experience a development and support priority.</rant>