Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    N900 2G weaker than 3G

    Reply
    killian | # 1 | 2012-07-03, 13:14 | Report

    Hi Guys,

    I hope I am not overlaping an existing thread!!!

    I have a N900 updated to SSU 21.2011.38-1Tmaemo4
    I live and work in the outskirts of London UK and use Vodafone UK.

    Recently decided to experiment on saving battery, by switching to GSM while in the office ( using the WiFi ) and moving back to 3G while I am out and about.

    This brought me to the following casus:

    While in the office, where the reception shouldn't be great the N900 3G reception is almost perfect - I mean full 5 bars!!
    In the meantime, at the very same spot, when switching to 2G, the reception of N900 rarely gets 1-2 bars as most of the time the phone doesn't get any reception!!!

    I found this weird - googled a bit, but as I couldn't find much, decided to post here in case anyone else has experienced the same.

    In my understanding - 3G should be harder to get and maintained, especially indoors, while 2G should be pretty much available almost everywhere ( ALMOST ).
    However - the dilema is - why would the 3G be in times better than the 2G reception !?!?! Could the UMTS be stronger than GSM ??!?!

    I tested with my old N95 mobile, which made no difference whether it is 2G or 3G - the reception was almost excellent, so the only possible conclusion was - it is the N900 - there is something about 2G that it doesn't like.

    Please, share your experience!

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by killian; 2012-07-03 at 13:26.

     
    bsd1101 | # 2 | 2012-07-03, 19:41 | Report

    I got the same "problem". I can find service much faster when I switch to 3g than GSM. If there was a way to fix this it would be great, even though most of the time it's ok.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout