Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    Android to beat Windows in 2016: Gartner

    Reply
    Page 1 of 4 | 1   2     3   | Next | Last
    daperl | # 1 | 2012-10-26, 00:04 | Report

    Ha ha ha ha ha

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/...89N11J20121024

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Kangal | # 2 | 2012-10-26, 00:22 | Report

    Doubt it.

    Not unless Android gets a lot more powerful, does some of the things Windows does, Multitasking, new interface, better Apps and new devices.

    For instance the Padphone2 with a hwkbd, microSD, microHDMi, USB 3.0, 4GB RAM, Quadcore A15 cpu.... plus ew software.

    Then yeah maybe.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Kangal For This Useful Post:
    ranbaxy, Wikiwide

     
    daperl | # 3 | 2012-10-26, 00:51 | Report

    Chrome OS and Android will mature and cross pollinate and will eventually create a single desktop -> mobile solution. This 11.6-inch ARM-based Samsung is another step in that direction. Google will get smart and widen the Chrome OS charter.

    Four Google years is like ten Microsoft years.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to daperl For This Useful Post:
    Wikiwide

     
    azkay | # 4 | 2012-10-26, 00:55 | Report

    Originally Posted by daperl View Post
    Chrome OS and Android will mature and cross pollinate and will eventually create a single desktop -> mobile solution. This 11.6-inch ARM-based Samsung is another step in that direction. Google will get smart and widen the Chrome OS charter.

    Four Google years is like ten Microsoft years.
    They should've stuck with the initial design;

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to azkay For This Useful Post:
    aStrike, Wikiwide

     
    daperl | # 5 | 2012-10-26, 01:23 | Report

    Originally Posted by azkay View Post
    They should've stuck with the initial design
    I think I'll take Samsung and a dual-core Cortex A-15 over Inventec and a single core Atom.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromebook#Models

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    azkay | # 6 | 2012-10-26, 01:35 | Report

    Originally Posted by daperl View Post
    I think I'll take Samsung and a dual-core Cortex A-15 over Inventec and a single core Atom.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromebook#Models
    The external design. Aesthetics.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to azkay For This Useful Post:
    Wikiwide

     
    daperl | # 7 | 2012-10-26, 01:45 | Report

    Originally Posted by azkay View Post
    The external design. Aesthetics.
    Ah, yes, I agree.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to daperl For This Useful Post:
    Wikiwide

     
    marxian | # 8 | 2012-10-26, 01:46 | Report

    Originally Posted by Kangal View Post
    Doubt it.

    Not unless Android gets a lot more powerful, does some of the things Windows does, Multitasking, new interface, better Apps and new devices.

    For instance the Padphone2 with a hwkbd, microSD, microHDMi, USB 3.0, 4GB RAM, Quadcore A15 cpu.... plus ew software.

    Then yeah maybe.
    The article does not suggest that Android will supplant the Windoze desktop machine, only that there will be more 'computing devices' running Andoid than Windoze. Many people purchase new smartphones/tablets far more often than new desktop machines, so it's quite feasible.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to marxian For This Useful Post:
    don_falcone, minimos, pichlo, Wikiwide

     
    balisingh | # 9 | 2012-10-26, 02:34 | Report

    Originally Posted by azkay View Post
    They should've stuck with the initial design;
    because it was based on Intel X86 and was way faster than this new thing. But its cheaper now. slow misery comes at a smaller price.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    daperl | # 10 | 2012-10-26, 02:51 | Report

    Originally Posted by balisingh View Post
    because it was based on Intel X86 and was way faster than this new thing. But its cheaper now. slow misery comes at a smaller price.
    What are you talking about?

    http://www.androidauthority.com/exyn...hmarks-125134/

    This new device should smoke the original.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to daperl For This Useful Post:
    herpderp

     
    Page 1 of 4 | 1   2     3   | Next | Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout