Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    ρcam 1.0.7 now in extras -- raw/jpg camera application for N9 and N900 with manual controls and image stabilization (N9 version still on 1.0.4)

    Reply
    Page 20 of 27 | Prev | 10   18     19   20   21     22   | Next | Last
    ladoga | # 191 | 2012-11-19, 22:29 | Report

    Originally Posted by qwazix View Post
    On the other hand, your problem might be unrelated, see pages 6-7 of this thread.
    Thanks, it was that tracker bug indeed. Now all works as expected.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to ladoga For This Useful Post:
    Wikiwide

     
    mdbxh | # 192 | 2012-11-22, 07:56 | Report

    photo is more dark than preview

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to mdbxh For This Useful Post:
    Wikiwide

     
    Siren | # 193 | 2012-11-22, 09:22 | Report

    Originally Posted by qwazix View Post
    After some real-life testing, accelerometer mode works only in very low light, as the accelerometer produces values at maximum 100Hz. Thus when the shutter speed is fast enough, the difference between two consecutive frames returns zero and the photo is snapped right away. I will try to fix that.
    Digital image stabilization using accelerometer, on N900?

    Very interesting stuff, thanks a lot for this. I wonder, are there any things, that are present in fCam (Maemo), yet lacking in rawcam? Also, do you know "lowlight" - a fCam derrivative, that takes low-light images, by shotting two frames, quickly - one with low exposure and high iso, and one with opposite setting - and combining them?

    I think, that accelerometer stabilization mixed with above method could produce even better results (or not, if time between frames would be too long). What do ya think?

    Edit: Same applies to "HDR picture" - another fCam derrivative, that takes few frames and combines them into HDR image. I wonder, if it could benefit for accelerometer stabilization, too? Both are FOSS, BTW.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Siren For This Useful Post:
    foobar, Wikiwide

     
    Cecchi85 | # 194 | 2012-11-22, 10:06 | Report

    Originally Posted by mdbxh View Post
    photo is more dark than preview
    me too.

    maybe i'm wrong to set raw ram.

    the same photo takes with stock camera and raw cam:

    stock camera


    raw cam with default settings


    raw cam with manual settins

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to Cecchi85 For This Useful Post:
    Wikiwide

     
    qwazix | # 195 | 2012-11-22, 11:51 | Report

    Yes I sometimes noticed this and I was debating if I should crank up the exposure a bit before capturing, but that would affect various devices differently. In normal conditions this difference shouldn't be too big, so I'm inclined to say, learn your device and adjust likewise, or later in software.

    This happens even in professional SLR's where the screen (or various computer screens as a matter of fact) display the image a bit differently.

    The accelerometer stablization hasn't made it to the N900 yet but it will (as soon as the autobuilder is back up). Also you can expect some more stabilization options too.

    Fcamera still has some features that ρcam doesn't, like hdr capture.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to qwazix For This Useful Post:
    foobar, MaKenZi, miqu, nkirk, OVK, peterleinchen, Siren, trompkins, Wikiwide

     
    PhilG13 | # 196 | 2012-11-28, 18:24 | Report

    Hey qwazix,

    Thanks for the 16:9 option, I really appreciate it!!

    Remember I told you about these weird lines I had before? Well , I'm almost sure it is the result of some kind of software conflict with your app and another one (even though I'm not using any).
    The app works fine for a couple of days and then these horrible lines appear again.




    The only solution I found was to reinstall the app.
    Do you have any ideas what could cause these artefacts?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    qwazix | # 197 | 2012-11-29, 20:08 | Report

    It's really weird, please try to pinpoint it, as I won't be able to look into it if I can't reproduce it. You say that uninstalling and reinstalling fixes the problem?

    Maybe try deleting the .rawcam folder from /home/user rawcam.conf file from /home/user/.config/oob/, (settings will be reset)

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by qwazix; 2012-12-09 at 18:30.

     
    KTy | # 198 | 2012-12-02, 02:03 | Report

    First of all, thanks for this excellent piece of software !

    Second, could you investigate something related to the gallery and wazapp ?
    http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php...00#post1300500

    I believe after taking a picture, rawcam is breaking something affecting the preview API.
    Cheers,

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    qwazix | # 199 | 2012-12-02, 20:36 | Report

    ρCam does nothing but save new pictures in jpg and dng format in MyDocs/DCIM (no API calls or anything, it would be the same if you just copied a picture there yourself)

    It is possible that the existence of dng images in DCIM breaks something. If disabling DNG save from settings solves the problem then I can change the location that the DNG files are being saved

    On the other hand the breakage might occur every time a big file is written and tracker tries to read it and create a preview.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    KTy | # 200 | 2012-12-04, 03:59 | Report

    I have disabled DNG file for now... (might be the default setting ?)

    Thanks,

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Page 20 of 27 | Prev | 10   18     19   20   21     22   | Next | Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout