Yes but for what I'm able to read from the blured text at the top, it shows v2 or something. But I dońt know, maybe itīs just a version number given by Nokia...
If this is the case then it doesn't seem so interesting... Maybe the build on N950's phone has been modified by Nokia to be optimized for the OS, in which case it is far more interesting. Otherwise itīs just an old version with the old FF UI...
Asking Nokia for the sources they used to build it is possible ? Is there not a license rule that force them to hand them out if asked ?
If this is the case then it doesn't seem so interesting... Maybe the build on N950's phone has been modified by Nokia to be optimized for the OS, in which case it is far more interesting. Otherwise itīs just an old version with the old FF UI...
Why would they optimize the code for a prototype? It would make very little sense, especially since they have their own browser.
I'm fairly certain this is the exact same tarball that my link has.
Asking Nokia for the sources they used to build it is possible ? Is there not a license rule that force them to hand them out if asked ?
That would be the GPL, but since the binary was not released (this does not count as a release), they are not obliged to release it.
But if n950 just uploads the firefox binary you can do a diff with the tarball from my link (armeabi version), and you'll most likely see it's the same.
