Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 90 | Thanked: 62 times | Joined on Jul 2012 @ India, Canada
#41
Nokia can just use Sailfish OS if they want to get away from WP. I know it seems ironic. Jolla would probably welcome them into their "ecosystem" lol. Maybe Jolla is a way for nokia to develop their own OS without interference from Microsoft, and get investors interested in it. Jolla could merge with Nokia later on, if WP strategy does end up to be a complete bust. imagine merging sailfish OS with Meego harmattan with Alien Dalvik!!! now that would be a crazy combo!


Or Nokia could merge their swipe patents with blackberry OS and build something great, and truly emerge as the third major ecosystem.

meh all theories. But as long as elop is in charge, I dont think he will look at anything else other than the big bucks from microsoft. I think his contract will be up over soon.....
 
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#42
Originally Posted by nonikhanna View Post
Nokia can just use Sailfish OS if they want to get away from WP. I know it seems ironic. Jolla would probably welcome them into their "ecosystem" lol. Maybe Jolla is a way for nokia to develop their own OS without interference from Microsoft, and get investors interested in it. Jolla could merge with Nokia later on, if WP strategy does end up to be a complete bust. imagine merging sailfish OS with Meego harmattan with Alien Dalvik!!! now that would be a crazy combo!


Or Nokia could merge their swipe patents with blackberry OS and build something great, and truly emerge as the third major ecosystem.

meh all theories. But as long as elop is in charge, I dont think he will look at anything else other than the big bucks from microsoft. I think his contract will be up over soon.....
To many dreamers in this forum.... thats for sure....
 
Posts: 207 | Thanked: 552 times | Joined on Jul 2011
#43
Originally Posted by gerbick
I need proof that's not from Tomi Ahonen (sp?).
It was from IHS Screen Digest.


Originally Posted by gerbick
The fact that Nokia was on a decline from the introduction of the iPhone
NOKIA's sales grew in 2010 but the overall market grew faster and so their market share declined.

For the past couple of years Apple's rate of growth has only been slightly greater than the overall market's growth. Should they dip under this year would you recommend they announce they're going to completely abandon iOS and exclusively adopt whichever OS has the smallest market share at that moment in order to halt the decline? What are the chances of that working?

These charts suggest NOKIA's performance wasn't nearly as bad as some would have you believe:






Symbian^3 devices were introduced at the end of 2010, NOKIA's average selling price for smart devices jumped from EUR 136 in Q3 2010 to EUR 156 in Q4 2010. They sold 28.3 million units in Q4 2010 compared to 26.5 million in Q3 2010 and 20.8 million in Q4 2009.

The N8 which was released in Q4 2010 was NOKIA's first full touchscreen device (i.e. iPhone style) that wasn't dreadfully ugly and woefully under-powered. Even so, camera aside, the spec was well below the Galaxy S that had been released several months earlier and when the SII was announced in Q1 2011 it totally blew the N8 out of the water.

Initially in Q1 2011 NOKIA stated demand for the N8 had exceeded their ability to supply it, shortly after Elop harpooned it.

I'm not saying everything in NOKIA's garden was rosy, in fact I'm surprised they were doing as well as they were given the state of their hardware relative to their competitors, but there's a real tendency in some quarters to exaggerate how badly they were doing.

Plus, of course, many of us were impatiently waiting for the first MeeGo device (the true iPhone/Galaxy SII rival) to appear...


Originally Posted by gerbick
and the upswing of Android predates the infamous Elop "burning platform" statement.
Almost every one of NOKIA's competitors had adopted Android so it's cummulative upswing wasn't a huge surprise. Sure that predates Elop's 'burning platforms' press release but it's not a justification for his action. It's blindingly obvious he did what he did to benefit Microsoft irrespective of the consequences for NOKIA.


Originally Posted by gerbick
And here, we agree. Samsung got Tizen from MeeGo. BlackBerry got the UI from Harmattan. Canonical got... well, they already had Ubuntu and Unity. Jolla, no comment there. They got engineers et al. Huawei... erm, not sure about that one either.
Canonical are using Qt/QML for Ubuntu mobile's apps. Huawei have joined Samsung in planning to release Tizen devices.


Originally Posted by Bernard
I was also very surprised that Nokia chose such an unproven platform.
I think you're being too generous calling it 'unproven', I think it was already a proven failure. Other manufacturers had tried Windows Phone and failed with it before NOKIA.


Originally Posted by Bernard
This wasn't just because of the SDK, but also because of the hardware. Prior to the September 2011 the Symbian phones had an insanely limited amount of video memory, you could say that they just were not designed for games.
I completely agree with you here, I think the N8 was the first Symbian phone to have a separate GPU wasn't it? But yes they had tiny little processors and tiny amounts of RAM, combine that with a genuinely multitasking OS and you can run out of resources pretty soon.

Imo NOKIA's ugly, low-spec hardware was much more of an issue than Symbian or MeeGo ever was. Now we have the reverse scenario, nice hardware that's hard to sell because of the OS.
 
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#44
Canonical is using a lot of previously open and free software to make their push into mobiles and they will not release their updates in a timely manner (just call it a hunch). Thanks for the Huawei clarification, didn't know that one.

Originally Posted by switch-hitter
For the past couple of years Apple's rate of growth has only been slightly greater than the overall market's growth. Should they dip under this year would you recommend they announce they're going to completely abandon iOS and exclusively adopt whichever OS has the smallest market share at that moment in order to halt the decline? What are the chances of that working?
Should iOS dip below the growth, should they abandon iOS? Dunno, ask Nokia what they would do... oh wait, they abandoned everything for the newly announced and already dead on arrival WP7.

Seriously, that's probably the most inaccurate way to ask the question that you should have asked: "What could Nokia have done differently to grow and expand their influence and sales while attempting to keep pace with the market growth?"

And to that, I have no one true answer other than I would not have done what they/Elop did. Period.

I don't trust Tomi Ahonen's numbers. So his slides, graphs, et al; keep them. They're biased by his recent 3+ year stretch of rants and repeated disappointment in Nokia. Besides, keep those graphs going into 2011. You'll see a lovely peak then plummet.

Whole pictures only. The whole picture or none at all. It's like picking one sentence in the Bible to support your entire basis for religion or opinion. It happens but rarely nobody likes it when it does happen...
 
Posts: 42 | Thanked: 33 times | Joined on Aug 2010 @ culpeper,va.
#45
http://www.nokia.com/global/about-no...lts---reports/
Here is from Nokia itself. Sales were growing.
 
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#46
Not seeing it. Which part of it supports your stance? Feel free to quote or direct link to it.
 
Posts: 2,076 | Thanked: 3,268 times | Joined on Feb 2011
#47
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
Dunno, ask Nokia what they would do... oh wait, they abandoned everything for the newly announced and already dead on arrival WP7.
Why am I in this thread? Oh yeah... DOA... Is Jolla DOA in your book? They don't have comparable money to Samsung who rock the marketing budget world. No other piece of hardware/system can match it, so forget the fight (facebook is going to be with us forever, like MySpace is).
Seriously, that's probably the most inaccurate way to ask the question that you should have asked: "What could Nokia have done differently to grow and expand their influence and sales while attempting to keep pace with the market growth?"

And to that, I have no one true answer other than I would not have done what they/Elop did. Period.
Sure, stick it to them with Symbian, since that is not what Elop did (would do) it definitely makes it a winning strategy.
I don't trust Tomi Ahonen's numbers.
His numbers usually are fine, the problem is cherry picking some numbers (what fits best to his claim, sometimes it is device numbers, sometimes it will be percentages, move/ignore the numbers for a Q or two, whatever makes Nokia/MS look bad, his own posts being best disproval of some of his newest posts, here have a full listing: http://dominiescommunicate.wordpress...-encyclopedia/
 
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#48
Originally Posted by szopin View Post
Why am I in this thread? Oh yeah... DOA... Is Jolla DOA in your book?
I thought I was addressing Nokia's past and not Jolla. One goddamn thing at a time please.

Jolla DOA? No. I personally don't think so. They're going where Android has about 78% of the mobile market, where Apple is starting to try to gain and homegrown attempts aren't taken as serious by the locals. But if anybody can do it, Jolla may make a dent into that market if the price and feature set resonates well with the China then the EU markets and users.

They don't have comparable money to Samsung who rock the marketing budget world.
Marketing shouldn't always dictate who's the best. A good product should do that. Trust me, I work at one agency while donating time as the technical director to another agency. I see great pitches for **** products and **** pitches for great products. In the end, it's how well other people talk about your product in this social media driven media as well as your distribution channels that create a positive or negative mindshare.

Well that and having Angry Birds on your platform sorta legitimizes your platform as well.

No other piece of hardware/system can match it, so forget the fight (facebook is going to be with us forever, like MySpace is).
Sooner than later folks will ask the right question... "Who's setting the specs that drive my purchases?" Why isn't it about performance or how this device that has more computing power than the Apollo space mission is in my back pocket and I'm barely doing anything as spectacular as going to the Moon... specs are great, but if you're not optimized, you might as well keep dropping multi-core CPU's and GPU's into a phone that's running a barely optimized OS.

*cough*Android*cough*

His numbers usually are fine, the problem is cherry picking some numbers
...wait. They're fine, but he's cherry-picking some numbers?

That's like saying your wife is sorta pregnant or you're sorta right and wrong with a twist of lemon in a bubble bath on Tuesday on the way to Mars.

Or something like that.

I just can't listen to the dude. He was once sane. Now? Not so much. Your last link proves that further.

Cool story bro.
 
Community Council | Posts: 4,920 | Thanked: 12,867 times | Joined on May 2012 @ Southerrn Finland
#49
Originally Posted by nonikhanna View Post
Nokia can just use Sailfish OS if they want to get away from WP. I know it seems ironic. Jolla would probably welcome them into their "ecosystem" lol.

Or Nokia could merge their swipe patents with blackberry OS and build something great, and truly emerge as the third major ecosystem.
I suppose anything is possible but is it financically feasible?

As I understand it Nokia has been getting "marketing allowance" from Microsoft, and in this deal they have sworn away the rights to develop / explore platforms other than WP.

Now, as all good thinks come to an end the MSFT money is going to be shut off, and the tide changes so that NOK needs now pay extra for the WP licenses it is purchasing.

However, the restrictions/agreements between NOK and MSFT remain, and Nokia cannot easily get out of the Microsoft train without paying a lot of money for contract seveance.
 
Posts: 337 | Thanked: 891 times | Joined on Jul 2012 @ Royaume Uni.
#50
Nokia signed a 5 year contract, 3 years are still remaining on it.
 
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:38.