|
|
2008-01-31
, 18:56
|
|
Posts: 1 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#72
|
|
|
2008-01-31
, 19:23
|
|
|
Posts: 248 |
Thanked: 15 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ MI, USA
|
#73
|
|
|
2008-01-31
, 19:25
|
|
Posts: 98 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Knightdale, NC
|
#74
|
Sorry, can't agree with you here.
If you bought a car today, and the manufacturer released a new model next week with more power, better handling and braking and the fuel efficiency of a diesel engine, would you go back and demand to have the latest engine management system, the improved brakes and suspension?
When we bought our tablets, we bought a snapshot of what could be achieved then. Back in 2006, before the N800 or N810 was made/sold, did it accomplish what it was supposed to do? I'm sure it did, or you would not (or should not) have bought it.
New models come out ever so often in today's consumer-driven society, and it would be dead unreasonable to expect manufacturers to stand obliged to upgrade previous generation device. Why? Because the device that the sold you in the first place worked as it said on the box. If your needs had changed, then expect to shell out for the next generation device.
Your example with the PC is a good one -- Guess what, the very expensive notebook I bought early last year isn't Vista-compatible, but XP Professional that came with it works perfectly well. Are you saying that I should go back to Lenovo and start ranting that they SHOULD BE OBLIGED to MAKE my notebook Vista-compatible, and that I am very ANGRY with them? I don't think so
Maybe someone should offer a leasing option for consumer devices such as iPods, notebooks and Internet Tablets. It would be a perfect option for consumers who think like you.
|
|
2008-01-31
, 19:35
|
|
|
Posts: 1,412 |
Thanked: 594 times |
Joined on Aug 2005
@ Recife, Brazil
|
#75
|
|
|
2008-01-31
, 19:44
|
|
Posts: 479 |
Thanked: 58 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Dubai, UAE
|
#76
|
|
|
2008-01-31
, 20:07
|
|
Posts: 30 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ The Hague, The Netherlands
|
#77
|
|
|
2008-01-31
, 20:29
|
|
Posts: 479 |
Thanked: 58 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Dubai, UAE
|
#78
|
|
|
2008-01-31
, 20:33
|
|
Posts: 311 |
Thanked: 110 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Boston, MA
|
#79
|
|
|
2008-01-31
, 21:09
|
|
Posts: 479 |
Thanked: 58 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
@ Dubai, UAE
|
#80
|
If you bought a car today, and the manufacturer released a new model next week with more power, better handling and braking and the fuel efficiency of a diesel engine, would you go back and demand to have the latest engine management system, the improved brakes and suspension?
When we bought our tablets, we bought a snapshot of what could be achieved then. Back in 2006, before the N800 or N810 was made/sold, did it accomplish what it was supposed to do? I'm sure it did, or you would not (or should not) have bought it.
New models come out ever so often in today's consumer-driven society, and it would be dead unreasonable to expect manufacturers to stand obliged to upgrade previous generation device. Why? Because the device that the sold you in the first place worked as it said on the box. If your needs had changed, then expect to shell out for the next generation device.
Your example with the PC is a good one -- Guess what, the very expensive notebook I bought early last year isn't Vista-compatible, but XP Professional that came with it works perfectly well. Are you saying that I should go back to Lenovo and start ranting that they SHOULD BE OBLIGED to MAKE my notebook Vista-compatible, and that I am very ANGRY with them? I don't think so
Maybe someone should offer a leasing option for consumer devices such as iPods, notebooks and Internet Tablets. It would be a perfect option for consumers who think like you.