Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    BlessN900 - better camera for N900

    Reply
    Page 29 of 31 | Prev | 19   27     28   29   30     31   | Next
    SMAr2wo | # 281 | 2013-06-25, 11:18 | Report

    BlessN900 BUG ?!

    Someone else can confirm that, after installing BlessN900 the STANDARD PHOTO CAMERA have some contrast issues ?

    After installing BlessN900 the standart photo application takes photos with excess of white ( too much exposure ). I uninstalled bless and after reeboting, the standard camera application is back again with good shots

    - 20130625_013 is made with the standard setup with the standard camera application, without Bless n900 installed (it was uninstalled and a reboot)

    - 20130625_012 i made this photo in the same ambient/light conditions, same setup for standard camera application, with BlessN900 (and f-cam) installed but seems it makes bad photos, especially in the forest or to a white flower surrounded by grass/ white object surrounded by a dark color.

    Solutions?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    Attached Images
      

    Last edited by SMAr2wo; 2013-06-25 at 12:01.
    The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to SMAr2wo For This Useful Post:
    Dongle Fongle, dzano, Estel, handaxe, nokiabot, petur, vetsin, Wikiwide, Xagoln

     
    handaxe | # 282 | 2013-06-25, 22:53 | Report

    Originally Posted by SMAr2wo View Post
    Someone else can confirm that, after installing BlessN900 the STANDARD PHOTO CAMERA have some contrast issues ?
    Interesting observation as I have over-exposure and you may have answered why. I have never had the n900 without stock camera, blessn900 and fcam so I never noticed that stock was OK without blessn900 (and you do mean blessn900 alone, as just fcamera does not cause the trouble?)

    I found that using the std photo setting in blessn900 produces a better exposure than does the stock.

    I also know that there is an exposure related bug in stock (not fixable as fault lies in closed binary blob) where exposure setting -0.5ev makes no difference and -1.0ev tends to too dark, so compensating for the over exposure does not work in stock.

    I doubt that blessn900 is developed anymore...

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to handaxe For This Useful Post:
    Dongle Fongle, dzano, Estel, nokiabot, rotoflex, SMAr2wo, Wikiwide, Xagoln

     
    Xagoln | # 283 | 2013-07-01, 03:11 | Report

    Thanks so much @SMAr2wo ! I have been wondering for so long why both of my N900s always produced photos that were so crap and over-exposed. I saw other peoples' pics and wondered how they ever managed to get non-crappy photos.

    The problem meant I usually used BlessN900 just because I couldn't rely on standard cam. I don't want to uninstall BlessN900 though.

    I didn't know about the exposure bug either, @handaxe and had wondered why I could never get the right compensation for standard cam's over-exposure tendencies.

    Thanks to you both. Maybe there's a workaround... I'm not sure I want to uninstall Bless.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Xagoln For This Useful Post:
    handaxe, nokiabot, SMAr2wo

     
    handaxe | # 284 | 2013-07-02, 08:05 | Report

    Originally Posted by SMAr2wo View Post
    BlessN900 BUG ?
    Did some testing - Blessn900 is NOT the culprit. It is the fcam-drivers that Blessn900 pulls as a dependency and was developed as part of the Fcamera program.

    Test consisted of uninstalling Blessn900 and fcamera and fcam-drivers, rebooting and then using stock camera. Next installed and fcamera (it pulls fcam-drivers) and rebooted. Used stock camera. Outcome evident at this point.

    Exposure of stock camera was well balanced without fcamera but evidently washed-out when photo taken after fcamera install. QED.

    Damn! Solution will not be simple. Both fcamera and blessn900 expose correctly using fcam-drivers as is....

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to handaxe For This Useful Post:
    dzano, mr_pingu, nokiabot, rotoflex, SMAr2wo, vetsin, _David_

     
    Hansie_k | # 285 | 2013-08-14, 08:25 | Report

    I've reinstalled the fcam drivers, that seems to fix the problem with BlessN900 to shutdown when taking a picture.
    But another problem I've got is, I need to open the lenscover twice to get a picture showing..?
    Any ideas?

    The lenscover itself works like it should with any other app.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to Hansie_k For This Useful Post:
    Dongle Fongle

     
    handaxe | # 286 | 2013-08-15, 14:40 | Report

    Originally Posted by Hansie_k View Post
    ... But another problem I've got is, I need to open the lenscover twice to get a picture showing..?
    I have this on occasion and restarting blessn900 usually solves it. But it is rare... I assume you are referring to the "viewfinder" picture?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    SMAr2wo | # 287 | 2013-08-20, 23:09 | Report

    i had this problem too. BlessN900 was unfunctional and the standard camera gave me "operation failure". I just update f-cam from Faster App and now is "ok".

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by SMAr2wo; 2013-08-20 at 23:41.

     
    davisrases | # 288 | 2013-08-21, 04:47 | Report

    [QUOTE=SMAr2wo;1354576]BlessN900 BUG ?!

    Someone else can confirm that, after installing BlessN900 the STANDARD PHOTO CAMERA have some contrast issues



    Now that you mention it, I am inclined to believe that BlessN900 is the culprit behind the over exposed shots of the standard camera of my phone. I thought it was due to the CSSU as I'm on CSSU testing. After installing BlessN900 I never used the standard camera app for shooting pictures until a few weeks back because of the time delay between two photos on BlessN900. The image size of the standard app also seems to be low, around 500kb for a widescreen shot.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to davisrases For This Useful Post:
    Wikiwide

     
    FlashInTheNight86 | # 289 | 2014-03-29, 13:16 | Report

    Which repository should I get this fantastic program from? Had it before full reflash & installing CSSU-Thumb, but can't remember where from did I download it...

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Ast007 | # 290 | 2014-03-29, 14:19 | Report

    Originally Posted by FlashInTheNight86 View Post
    Which repository should I get this fantastic program from? Had it before full reflash & installing CSSU-Thumb, but can't remember where from did I download it...
    http://blessn900.com/download/

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to Ast007 For This Useful Post:
    SMAr2wo

     
    Page 29 of 31 | Prev | 19   27     28   29   30     31   | Next
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout