|
2014-01-18
, 23:02
|
|
Posts: 694 |
Thanked: 619 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#112
|
|
2014-01-18
, 23:11
|
|
Posts: 956 |
Thanked: 2,628 times |
Joined on Nov 2011
|
#113
|
|
2014-01-18
, 23:13
|
Posts: 445 |
Thanked: 367 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
@ Italy
|
#114
|
|
2014-01-18
, 23:13
|
Posts: 99 |
Thanked: 36 times |
Joined on Mar 2010
|
#115
|
Ok, here's little bit of history of Tweetian: When I start develop Tweetian, I just do it for fun and practicing. I never expect that Tweetian will get so many users. That's why I release it as free (and open source after that), because it is a spare time project and I never plan to monetize and maintain it.
My programming skill (especially C++) is extremely low when I start develop Tweetian (I'm just a student who knew a little bit of Java). So at that stage the code is very poorly written (and hard to maintain).
Slowly when I developed Tweetian my knowledge and skill is improved, until a stage where I realise the code for Tweetian to too poor written and very hard to maintain. So I stopped developed new feature for it and only give a passive support (for API changes).
Why don't I do a rewrite then? Because it is too hard. I takes ~3 months to release a pre-release version and maybe half year for to get it submitted to Nokia Store.
I really happy that there are so many Tweetian users (mainly because it is free?). However, I'm still a student. I develop Tweetian just for interest and never for money. The "responsibility" for me to continue maintain it is too heavy because it has so many users, while I get very less incentive in return.
TL;DR I developed apps just for fun and interest. I never expect to have such heavy responsibility to maintain it after I no longer interested in it (because it is getting hard to maintain). You can say I'm irresponsibility, but remember that I didn't earn any money for all the apps I developed.
|
2014-01-18
, 23:20
|
Posts: 445 |
Thanked: 367 times |
Joined on Nov 2010
@ Italy
|
#116
|
Ok, here's little bit of history of Tweetian: When I start develop Tweetian, I just do it for fun and practicing. I never expect that Tweetian will get so many users. That's why I release it as free (and open source after that), because it is a spare time project and I never plan to monetize and maintain it.
My programming skill (especially C++) is extremely low when I start develop Tweetian (I'm just a student who knew a little bit of Java). So at that stage the code is very poorly written (and hard to maintain).
Slowly when I developed Tweetian my knowledge and skill is improved, until a stage where I realise the code for Tweetian to too poor written and very hard to maintain. So I stopped developed new feature for it and only give a passive support (for API changes).
Why don't I do a rewrite then? Because it is too hard. I takes ~3 months to release a pre-release version and maybe half year for to get it submitted to Nokia Store.
I really happy that there are so many Tweetian users (mainly because it is free?). However, I'm still a student. I develop Tweetian just for interest and never for money. The "responsibility" for me to continue maintain it is too heavy because it has so many users, while I get very less incentive in return.
TL;DR I developed apps just for fun and interest. I never expect to have such heavy responsibility to maintain it after I no longer interested in it (because it is getting hard to maintain). You can say I'm irresponsibility, but remember that I didn't earn any money for all the apps I developed.
|
2014-01-19
, 02:04
|
Posts: 9 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Mar 2013
@ Ankara, Turkey
|
#117
|
The Following User Says Thank You to srknbey For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-01-19
, 04:22
|
Posts: 26 |
Thanked: 41 times |
Joined on Oct 2013
@ USA
|
#118
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to dini For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-01-21
, 11:00
|
Posts: 141 |
Thanked: 417 times |
Joined on Jun 2012
@ Malaysia
|
#119
|
And your client lives on in SailfishOS. Poor veskuh has to maintain your code now
I allways wondered why somebody need to write all code again and again if there is an decent alternative to use. Isn't it the beauty of open source to use the codes already written? In this situtation for example could somebody port an twitter app already has support for api and other stuff? If i have any skill to code i definitely wanna do it myself but there is none.
As i know for twitter an app need two part of codes: A library code to access to the api and it's the hardwork part of the job because that part of code need to maintain and time to time need to change; second part is the user interface and i think that's the easy one for a programmer. (Certainly not for me ) Am i wrong?
The Following User Says Thank You to dicksonleong8 For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2014-01-21
, 18:38
|
Posts: 673 |
Thanked: 230 times |
Joined on Oct 2012
@ Mumbai
|
#120
|
Thank you for everything Dickson! !!
MeeGo Wont Die
2016