Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    [SCRIPT] Using the N900 as Sonar

    Reply
    Page 2 of 4 | Prev |   1   2   3     4   | Next
    Vento | # 11 | 2014-07-12, 06:59 | Report

    Little suggestion. Maybe you should change the title... Add [SCRIPT],[POC], [ANNUNCE] or [WIP] before the name

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to Vento For This Useful Post:
    Encypruon

     
    Estel | # 12 | 2014-07-12, 10:23 | Report

    Announce is good idea. Otherwise, most people may think it's some...one asking, if his N900 can act as a sonar. Which may result in whole array of reactions - moving along without reading is just one of them

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    SHARP66 | # 13 | 2014-07-13, 01:10 | Report

    I think It can detect direction to, if you alter the sound in channels.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    taixzo | # 14 | 2014-07-13, 03:41 | Report

    Originally Posted by SHARP66 View Post
    I think It can detect direction to, if you alter the sound in channels.
    So, like the way our ears work, but in reverse? (two sounds/one microphone rather than two microphones/one sound)

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to taixzo For This Useful Post:
    pichlo

     
    Velian | # 15 | 2014-07-13, 19:01 | Report

    It would be a great idea to take some developer eh did this idea of ​​a real theremin n900

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    lexik | # 16 | 2014-07-13, 22:31 | Report

    Originally Posted by Velian View Post
    It would be a great idea to take some developer eh did this idea of ​​a real theremin n900
    You need two 'lines' for theremin, maybe proximity sensor near front cam could be the second one? (pretty crazy)

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    rotoflex | # 17 | 2014-07-14, 06:25 | Report

    If it's emitting clicks for sonar, they might not be very musical for a theremin.

    A theremin could be fun, though.

    Maybe you could use the front camera to calculate distance by the monocular depth cue apparent size of a hand: smaller as it's farther away, larger as it's closer, and whether it's at nearer the left, right, top or bottom.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    peterleinchen | # 18 | 2014-07-14, 07:21 | Report

    Originally Posted by rotoflex View Post
    If it's emitting clicks for sonar, ...
    Do you mean this kind of clicks?
    Then we possibly may achieve it via espeak?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to peterleinchen For This Useful Post:
    Estel, nokiabot, pichlo, SHARP66

     
    sulu | # 19 | 2014-07-14, 14:00 | Report

    Originally Posted by Estel View Post
    Interesting, gotta check the accuracy. I wonder if it would more effectively underwater, for obvious reasons (after altering calculations, of course)?
    As a rough estimate, the maximum range should increase by factor 9 due to the better sound propagation quality of water compared to air, but the accuracy will drop by about factor 4.3 due to the higher speed of sound (and therefore smaller delay).

    The details depend on signal frequency as well as medium temperature and pressure.
    I assumed something in the range of 1-2kHz, 25°C and sea level.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sulu For This Useful Post:
    Estel, pichlo, reinob

     
    chill | # 20 | 2014-07-17, 22:23 | Report

    Could range and/or accuracy be increased by attaching more powerful speakers and/or a better microphone?

    One could detect movement in another room that way, too (which would certainly be a range increase) .

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Page 2 of 4 | Prev |   1   2   3     4   | Next
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout