Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    Camera phone competition February 2015:"Black and white"

    Reply
    Page 2 of 7 | Prev |   1   2   3     4   | Next | Last
    saponga | # 11 | 2015-02-08, 12:11 | Report

    N900 - Rotated on Konsole

    EDIT: Post rotated picture.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by saponga; 2015-02-09 at 10:39.
    The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to saponga For This Useful Post:
    chenliangchen, Copernicus, FlashInTheNight86, Half-Life_4_Life, juiceme, mrsellout, pichlo, robthebold, rotoflex, Wikiwide

     
    pichlo | # 12 | 2015-02-08, 13:04 | Report

    Originally Posted by saponga View Post
    EDIT: Sorry, but the picture is showed in wrong position here even though it's ok on dropbox. The photo was originally taken in portrait.
    Yes, TMO does that. I think it just ignores the orientation flag. So does the Windows picture viewer which makes it a perfect tool to check how the picture will look ob TMO

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post:
    Copernicus, Docinha, FlashInTheNight86, Half-Life_4_Life, juiceme, saponga, Wikiwide

     
    Half-Life_4_Life | # 13 | 2015-02-08, 15:58 | Report

    I always rotate the picture if needed on my PC. It's the only post processing I do.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Half-Life_4_Life For This Useful Post:
    FlashInTheNight86, juiceme, saponga, Wikiwide

     
    saponga | # 14 | 2015-02-08, 18:49 | Report

    Originally Posted by Half-Life_4_Life View Post
    I always rotate the picture if needed on my PC. It's the only post processing I do.
    Ok... but in this case the picture is already rotated and, as pichlo said, TMO just ignores the rotation.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to saponga For This Useful Post:
    FlashInTheNight86, juiceme, Wikiwide

     
    pichlo | # 15 | 2015-02-09, 09:41 | Report

    @saponga, what I meant was... your phone takes the picture in a (for example) 2576x1936 resolution and flags it as "rotated". Some picture viewers honour that flag, others don't. If you rotate the picture in e.g. Windows Photo Viewer, the original resolution gets transposed to 1936x2576, no rotation flag. I think this is the post-processing Half-Life meant.

    Here is my entry. My kids feeding the ducks in the park, with some gulls trying to snatch the food. Taken yesterday, 8 Feb 2015, with my N900:

    Name:  20150208_025.jpg
Views: 663
Size:  88.4 KB

    ...And here's a couple more for a god measure, out of the competition. The one on the left is from the same event, the one on the right is the first snow in our garden about a week ago. I originally meant to submit that one because snow is so unusual around here but I decided to wait until I find a better one.

    Name:  20150208_020.jpg
Views: 375
Size:  51.0 KB Name:  20150203_003.jpg
Views: 389
Size:  40.9 KB

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post:
    chenliangchen, Copernicus, Docinha, FlashInTheNight86, Half-Life_4_Life, imaginaryenemy, juiceme, Macros, mrsellout, robthebold, rotoflex, saponga, Wikiwide

     
    saponga | # 16 | 2015-02-09, 10:16 | Report

    Originally Posted by pichlo View Post
    @saponga, what I meant was... your phone takes the picture in a (for example) 2576x1936 resolution and flags it as "rotated". Some picture viewers honour that flag, others don't. If you rotate the picture in e.g. Windows Photo Viewer, the original resolution gets transposed to 1936x2576, no rotation flag. I think this is the post-processing Half-Life meant.
    Ok. Got it. I'll rotate it...
    Thanks.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to saponga For This Useful Post:
    FlashInTheNight86, juiceme, Wikiwide

     
    juiceme | # 17 | 2015-02-12, 11:53 | Report



    -- edit --

    Details; Taken with Jolla, colors leeched & rescaled in Gimp.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to juiceme For This Useful Post:
    chenliangchen, FlashInTheNight86, Half-Life_4_Life, mrsellout, robthebold, rotoflex, Wikiwide

     
    FlashInTheNight86 | # 18 | 2015-02-17, 11:51 | Report

    Name:  IMG_20150217_143922.jpg
Views: 462
Size:  66.2 KB

    Taken and converted to B&W on XT894

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to FlashInTheNight86 For This Useful Post:
    chenliangchen, Copernicus, Docinha, Half-Life_4_Life, imaginaryenemy, juiceme, maegon9y00, mrsellout, panjgoori, pichlo, robthebold, rotoflex, SHARP66, Wikiwide

     
    Half-Life_4_Life | # 19 | 2015-02-18, 20:49 | Report

    Don't be afraid to get closer to stuff. Maybe you could've shined a light to the left or right on that hat and do a close up of it, gradients and stuff. This way the photo looks flat and dull.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Half-Life_4_Life For This Useful Post:
    FlashInTheNight86, juiceme, Wikiwide

     
    Maxdamantus | # 20 | 2015-02-22, 11:19 | Report



    Taken with an N900 using FCamera, averaged red and green channels to obtain greyscale.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Maxdamantus For This Useful Post:
    chenliangchen, FlashInTheNight86, juiceme, mrsellout, pichlo, Wikiwide

     
    Page 2 of 7 | Prev |   1   2   3     4   | Next | Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout