Active Topics

 


Poll: Did you order a Jolla tablet?
Poll Options
Did you order a Jolla tablet?

Closed Thread
Thread Tools
ZogG's Avatar
Posts: 1,389 | Thanked: 1,857 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Israel
#2661
Originally Posted by Copernicus View Post
So, ZogG, question: is there any private corporation you actually like?
I do not like corporations in general. But I do like those who chose dark side and at least have balls to tell it, to make choice up to you and not fool you.
If you look in history, many projects were born as "something cool", innovating, interesting idea and to work on. But it was ruined and corrupted by management, run for money or outside people. (see google as an example)
the problem nowdays that it's hard to compete and to do it "right". But on other hand if no one will start, we'll always run in those circles
Btw I had good exp with Pebble, nVidia and I think few more. (I liked what Nokia did and certain people from there, while on other hand i hate how they ruined things on other hand)
P.S. Please spell my name right
__________________
IRC nick on freenode — ZogG
imgrup
 
mikelima's Avatar
Posts: 141 | Thanked: 359 times | Joined on Aug 2010 @ Italy
#2662
Originally Posted by Fellfrosch View Post
That's definitly true. But what I never understood, was that they never really tried to open other income channels. Why didn't they sell batteries or other TOH (not only different colors). Why didn't they try to sell some more powerful apps, fan-article... Of course nothing of these things would have been enough. But at least there would have been a little more income and they wouldn't have to rely solely on the investors.
I think they tried other channels, but did not succeed. There were all these talks about the russian government, a few potential partnerships, that were announced at one time or another... they did not get concrete.

Developing apps, other halves, batteries takes resources, and the current user base cannot provide a reasonable source of income, unless your userbase gets in the million users or so.

Take other halves: say they have a profit of 5 euro for each unit sold, if they sell 10k units, that's 50k euro of profit. That covers probably two days of expenses for a Finnish firm of 150 people.
__________________
My projects: Quando Parte, Quanto Fa
 
Posts: 388 | Thanked: 1,340 times | Joined on Nov 2007 @ Finland
#2663
Originally Posted by Fellfrosch View Post
That's definitly true. But what I never understood, was that they never really tried to open other income channels. Why didn't they sell batteries or other TOH (not only different colors).
The issue might be that the production runs for those are so small that they would make losses on selling and stocking them. Just like with the tablets.
 
Community Council | Posts: 4,920 | Thanked: 12,867 times | Joined on May 2012 @ Southerrn Finland
#2664
Originally Posted by ste-phan View Post
At that point Jolla, IMO, by serving a contract outside of the mobile enthusiasts’ scope, has stopped being a startup and needed different kind of funding to match the chosen direction.
I am not entirely sure how are you defining a startup? To me a startup is a new company that does not yet have a marketable product that it can sell, but as potential in the eyes of some investors, hence gets funding.


Originally Posted by ste-phan View Post
The (intel) tablet being a project with lower prestige level than releasing a Jolla II in all aspects superior to the original Jolla should not have made it to mass production unless there was real profit to be made.
As I see it both the Jolla pone and the Jolla tablet were meant as showcase devices for the OS and the technology, never meant as products to be sold for profit.
There never was going to be any "Jolla phone II"
 
Dave999's Avatar
Posts: 7,074 | Thanked: 9,069 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
#2665
Originally Posted by Copernicus View Post
Simple. Jolla leaders were depending on receiving a round of funding in November. They essentially bet the entire company on it. If they had received it, the most logical thing to do would be to maximize the Tablet output, to get as many devices in the hands of users as possible, and encourage new apps to be written by developers. This would in turn provide more advertising for Sailfish, which would boost their ability to encourage manufacturers to become licensees.

But, of course, everything was dependent on getting that additional funding.

It was probably a decent bet for a startup to make. If that funding had come through, Jolla would have had one of the few alternative OSs this year that was still ascendent. That alone might have made manufacturers more interested in Sailfish...
Yep, it's obvious that they completely misread the situation. The question is why the dident prepared for this to save its customers and with that the only one that is loyal to them. Now they only have a few fans left...given no tablet/compensation appears.
__________________
Do something for the climate today! Anything!

I don't trust poeple without a Nokia n900...
 
Copernicus's Avatar
Posts: 1,986 | Thanked: 7,698 times | Joined on Dec 2010 @ Dayton, Ohio
#2666
Originally Posted by Dave999 View Post
Yep, it's obvious that they completely misread the situation.
Er, in what way? Startups have to do this sort of thing to succeed; they have to bet that they will eventually be successful. If they went forward reasoning "hey, we're probably not going to receive the next round of funding, so we need to tighten our belts, minimize our workforce, and spend the least amount possible to keep running", they would flat-out fail.

What's the point of even starting a company if you are betting on failure?
 
Dave999's Avatar
Posts: 7,074 | Thanked: 9,069 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
#2667
Originally Posted by Copernicus View Post
Er, in what way? Startups have to do this sort of thing to succeed; they have to bet that they will eventually be successful. If they went forward reasoning "hey, we're probably not going to receive the next round of funding, so we need to tighten our belts, minimize our workforce, and spend the least amount possible to keep running", they would flat-out fail.

What's the point of even starting a company if you are betting on failure?
They have to bet WHEN they have the money and they had the money but failed somewhere. Not sure where exactly. Unless they have don just that. Saved enough money to ship the product but I doubt that from the info we have.
__________________
Do something for the climate today! Anything!

I don't trust poeple without a Nokia n900...
 
Posts: 101 | Thanked: 381 times | Joined on Aug 2010
#2668
Originally Posted by juiceme View Post
As I see it both the Jolla pone and the Jolla tablet were meant as showcase devices for the OS and the technology, never meant as products to be sold for profit.
There never was going to be any "Jolla phone II"
Maybe you are right. I also consider the phone and the tablet as demonstrators.

However, these products were also sold to consumers like us and Jolla somehow also depend on positive user feedback that creates confidence with the commercial partners of Jolla. Therefore a more attractive product (e.g. Jolla phone 2) could have helped to create a more positive reception. So far, the prevailing reception was: it is not ready yet (promising, but not ready ..) and the hardware (of the phone) is so lala (but quite expensicve if only measured by the HW properties). The tablet had a fair price tag (for consumers) from the beginning but .. it is not there (for the most part of us).
 
Posts: 207 | Thanked: 759 times | Joined on Dec 2014 @ Poland
#2669
 
Fellfrosch's Avatar
Posts: 1,092 | Thanked: 4,995 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ beautiful cave
#2670
yes, using the devices as showcases makes definitely sense. On the other hand than i absoutely don't understand why the main investors exactly now draw back, when the first partnership with intex is announced and a second device is ready developed and just waiting for production and delivery. i think if the devices were just showcases they must have agreed on that.
 
Closed Thread

Tags
moral hazard, paypal refund


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 13:14.