|
|
2015-12-10
, 16:12
|
|
|
Posts: 141 |
Thanked: 359 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
@ Italy
|
#2662
|
That's definitly true. But what I never understood, was that they never really tried to open other income channels. Why didn't they sell batteries or other TOH (not only different colors). Why didn't they try to sell some more powerful apps, fan-article... Of course nothing of these things would have been enough. But at least there would have been a little more income and they wouldn't have to rely solely on the investors.
|
|
2015-12-10
, 16:12
|
|
Posts: 388 |
Thanked: 1,340 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
@ Finland
|
#2663
|
|
|
2015-12-10
, 16:15
|
|
Community Council |
Posts: 4,920 |
Thanked: 12,867 times |
Joined on May 2012
@ Southerrn Finland
|
#2664
|
At that point Jolla, IMO, by serving a contract outside of the mobile enthusiasts’ scope, has stopped being a startup and needed different kind of funding to match the chosen direction.
The (intel) tablet being a project with lower prestige level than releasing a Jolla II in all aspects superior to the original Jolla should not have made it to mass production unless there was real profit to be made.
|
|
2015-12-10
, 16:22
|
|
|
Posts: 7,074 |
Thanked: 9,069 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#2665
|
Simple. Jolla leaders were depending on receiving a round of funding in November. They essentially bet the entire company on it. If they had received it, the most logical thing to do would be to maximize the Tablet output, to get as many devices in the hands of users as possible, and encourage new apps to be written by developers. This would in turn provide more advertising for Sailfish, which would boost their ability to encourage manufacturers to become licensees.
But, of course, everything was dependent on getting that additional funding.
It was probably a decent bet for a startup to make. If that funding had come through, Jolla would have had one of the few alternative OSs this year that was still ascendent. That alone might have made manufacturers more interested in Sailfish...
|
|
2015-12-10
, 16:27
|
|
|
Posts: 1,986 |
Thanked: 7,698 times |
Joined on Dec 2010
@ Dayton, Ohio
|
#2666
|
|
|
2015-12-10
, 16:35
|
|
|
Posts: 7,074 |
Thanked: 9,069 times |
Joined on Oct 2009
@ Moon! It's not the East or the West side... it's the Dark Side
|
#2667
|
Er, in what way? Startups have to do this sort of thing to succeed; they have to bet that they will eventually be successful. If they went forward reasoning "hey, we're probably not going to receive the next round of funding, so we need to tighten our belts, minimize our workforce, and spend the least amount possible to keep running", they would flat-out fail.
What's the point of even starting a company if you are betting on failure?
|
|
2015-12-10
, 16:56
|
|
Posts: 101 |
Thanked: 381 times |
Joined on Aug 2010
|
#2668
|
As I see it both the Jolla pone and the Jolla tablet were meant as showcase devices for the OS and the technology, never meant as products to be sold for profit.
There never was going to be any "Jolla phone II"
|
|
2015-12-10
, 17:32
|
|
Posts: 207 |
Thanked: 759 times |
Joined on Dec 2014
@ Poland
|
#2669
|
|
|
2015-12-10
, 17:46
|
|
|
Posts: 1,092 |
Thanked: 4,995 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ beautiful cave
|
#2670
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| moral hazard, paypal refund |
|
If you look in history, many projects were born as "something cool", innovating, interesting idea and to work on. But it was ruined and corrupted by management, run for money or outside people. (see google as an example)
the problem nowdays that it's hard to compete and to do it "right". But on other hand if no one will start, we'll always run in those circles
Btw I had good exp with Pebble, nVidia and I think few more. (I liked what Nokia did and certain people from there, while on other hand i hate how they ruined things on other hand)
P.S. Please spell my name right
IRC nick on freenode — ZogG
imgrup