The oddly is what doesn't sit. Jolla has the money, they are offering refunds therefore they can pay for the tablets.
As for the 'asset liquidation', it would be ok to sell them with stickers over the logo, and with no mention of Jolla. The description should nor refer to the campaign, and especially not lift the artwork from it. I can't belive you're defending these vultures.
The oddly is what doesn't sit. Jolla has the money, they are offering refunds therefore they can pay for the tablets.
It forces you to think that Jolla hasn't offered yet to pay for those built tablets. The factory just wants to make money and not lose any money.
Originally Posted by
As for the 'asset liquidation', it would be ok to sell them with stickers over the logo, and with no mention of Jolla. The description should nor refer to the campaign, and especially not lift the artwork from it. I can't belive you're defending these vultures.
I'm not defending their actions. I know how businesses run and if you were sitting on top of 2000+ devices that are sitting there, gathering dust and whatnot, I'd sell them too. And without a sticker on any logo - why lose even more money?
Why would you do after you've waited a reasonable amount of time?
I'm not defending their actions. I know how businesses run and if you were sitting on top of 2000+ devices that are sitting there, gathering dust and whatnot, I'd sell them too. And without a sticker on any logo - why lose even more money?
Why would you do after you've waited a reasonable amount of time?
"I'm not defending their actions." <defends their actions>
I can sort of understand why they'd offer them for sale when it looked like Jolla was going bankrupt, but there's no good reason not to withdraw them when they recovered. What they're trying to do is maximize their return by selling the tablets to *you again*. That's why they have Jolla branding all over them, to get you to buy them.
