Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    Sailfish on Turing Phones?

    Reply
    Page 15 of 80 | Prev | 5   13     14   15   16     17   25 | Next | Last
    Dave999 | # 141 | 2016-02-04, 17:16 | Report

    I guess without refund still?

    Hope jolla Isnt involved in this...and that he is trying this scam on his own.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

    Last edited by Dave999; 2016-02-04 at 18:08.
    The Following User Says Thank You to Dave999 For This Useful Post:
    imaginaryenemy

     
    robthebold | # 142 | 2016-02-04, 17:29 | Report

    Originally Posted by pichlo View Post
    I am getting really tired of this "but they are a startup" excuse. A startup cannot use an off-the-shelf component?

    To be fair, before aegis' post, I also assumed that they used a non-standard connector to achieve water protection but once you know what to look for, you find hundreds of existing solutions. No need to reinvent the wheel.
    (If this phone is vaporware, none of the following matters at all.)

    I personally don't mind the idea of moving away from micro usb, not just for water resistance. (For me, water resistance isn't really in my top 10 priorities, but it wouldn't hurt.) Micro USB charging/syncing has as its primary advantage, IMO, its ubiquity, which was its purpose in the first place. It's far from ideal, though. I see the biggest pluses of Turing's connector choice to be the magnetic connection like Apple's. When I trip over my wife's macbook or iPhone power cable in the dark, it falls off, usually without drama. When I trip over my phone cable in the dark, it goes flying across the room, ports get bent a little, stuff sometimes breaks, heart rate soars. Plus, I find it way too easy to stupidly try cramming the plug in upside down and munging up both plug and jack a little in the process. (Looks like USB-C solves this issue, if I'm properly informed.)

    The obvious disadvantage of going with a proprietary or less common connector of course is not being able to borrow a friend's charger or easily replacing a dead one in a hurry. Apple solves this by being huge. So many iPhones out there if you need a replacement it's no further than the impulse counter at the grocery store. That would not be the case with the Turingphone charger.

    So if I were Turing, and I were marketing just to me, I'd emphasize those advantages above over the water resistance. But there may also be a reason I'm not in marketing. Maybe if I were I'd just look for a nice waterproof USB-C.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to robthebold For This Useful Post:
    Feathers McGraw, juiceme, mosen, pichlo, santeira

     
    robthebold | # 143 | 2016-02-04, 17:35 | Report

    Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
    Dang it... I can no longer find it but isn't this basically the 3 year project originally named Quasar IV or something?

    Edit: Found it... he promised that he'd give those backers back in 2013 or so two of these phones for their investments.
    Interesting. Looks like Steve Chao is now SYL Chao. Fresh start? Or maybe he just decided to lose his "nerd name".

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to robthebold For This Useful Post:
    juiceme

     
    strongm | # 144 | 2016-02-04, 18:03 | Report

    Originally Posted by endsormeans View Post
    naming a device line after tragedy is like naming your boat "the unsinkable titanic 2
    ..I would never own a device called the "Turing"
    Presumably that means you'd refuse the Turing Award if it was ever offered to you ...

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to strongm For This Useful Post:
    juiceme

     
    pichlo | # 145 | 2016-02-04, 18:19 | Report

    Originally Posted by robthebold View Post
    Maybe if I were I'd just look for a nice waterproof USB-C.
    Quite. USB C or USB D, an off-the-shelf solution wins over a proprietary one, which looks like a feeble attempt at customer lock-in.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post:
    juiceme, robthebold, ZogG

     
    HtheB | # 146 | 2016-02-04, 18:46 | Report

    Funny fact that you might miss: the Charging port, is ONLY for charging... NOT for data transfer! (Yes, you can't connect it to a pc!?)

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to HtheB For This Useful Post:
    Bundyo, Feathers McGraw, juiceme, kinggo, MartinK, mosen, nodevel, pichlo, robthebold, santeira

     
    Jedibeeftrix | # 147 | 2016-02-04, 19:01 | Report

    Originally Posted by HtheB View Post
    Funny fact that you might miss: the Charging port, is ONLY for charging... NOT for data transfer! (Yes, you can't connect it to a pc!?)
    only wireless for data transfer?

    odd choice, my year old x99 / 5820k machine doesn't have bluetooth.
    a phone just for laptop'pers!

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following User Says Thank You to Jedibeeftrix For This Useful Post:
    juiceme

     
    kinggo | # 148 | 2016-02-04, 19:39 | Report

    Originally Posted by HtheB View Post
    Funny fact that you might miss: the Charging port, is ONLY for charging... NOT for data transfer! (Yes, you can't connect it to a pc!?)
    and again, some will attack. But I honestly don't know when I used cable for anything else but charging.
    But why so many pins on that one then?

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to kinggo For This Useful Post:
    Bundyo, Feathers McGraw, juiceme, robthebold

     
    pichlo | # 149 | 2016-02-04, 19:44 | Report

    Originally Posted by Jedibeeftrix View Post
    only wireless for data transfer?

    odd choice, my year old x99 / 5820k machine doesn't have bluetooth.
    a phone just for laptop'pers!
    I never use Bluetooth. Never. As far as I am concerned, it is a wasted space on the chip die. I do nearly all my data transfer over SFTP. Even your old machine must support that.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post:
    Feathers McGraw, juiceme, reinob, robthebold

     
    HtheB | # 150 | 2016-02-04, 19:46 | Report

    Originally Posted by kinggo View Post
    and again, some will attack. But I honestly don't know when I used cable for anything else but charging.
    But why so many pins on that one then?
    I use it a lot with transferring photos and videos. Takes a LOT longer with wireless connection.

    Edit: I'm also thinking... It means that we can't flash the device at all if something happens... since there is no data connection available on that port!?.....

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks
    The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to HtheB For This Useful Post:
    Feathers McGraw, Jordi, juiceme, kinggo, pichlo, robthebold, santeira, thedead1440

     
    Page 15 of 80 | Prev | 5   13     14   15   16     17   25 | Next | Last
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout