I made it 135.0 x 67.0 for the 'glass' itself, but I don't have a decent vernier here. Measured from the image I posted earlier I got 135.0 x 67.5.
Decent measurement tools and decent computer are both at home.
EDIT : Checked with a proper vernier and measuring the supplied plastic shield (because it's easier to define where the edge actually is) I get 135.3mm x 67.3mm. Shame I don't have access to a travelling microscope at work any more
During measurement i also had the feeling that 135.5 x 67.5 is to much of a risc and possibly hard to apply.
So we should report 135 x 67 with 1mm corner radius to bedifol tomorrow to play safe and have some space to adjust?
I guess they can even work out a good result with the scan and exact outer dimension of the phone. But we will see.
Well the fairphone isn't that highend. Only the price is. But that has to be, otherwise they can't produce it fair. And to be honest I absolutly like the idea and I'm willing to pay more for this idea. Maybe you can gather a used one from ebay or somewhere else.
It's not about price, but rather about specs. I find no reason to get such a powerful processor when I'm mostly fine with the current performance on the Jolla, and would rather prefer to have a measly processor that sips battery life even when in use (since I usually disable suspend-on-screen-off and "run stuff" on the phone).
Obviously, if they managed to put a largeish processor and still keep decent battery life, then I have nothing to say...
The Jolla C seemed interesting because of the weaker processor in raw numbers, but it doesn't seem the battery life improves much...
OnePlus X looks okay and has a nice port. Plus Kimmoli probably needs a helping hand with it
However,
A) I would still need a primary phone,
B) I am still unsure of the business model behind ports.
And by the way, I got the Jolla C and yeah, it has neither a compass nor a gyroscope. Can't find a difference in performance compared to Sbj, and the kernel is pretty old too -- 3.10. Quite unimpressed so far.
Not worth losing the hwkb at all, at least for me.
Will try to use it for a day to evaluate sunlight screen readability and battery life.
I can also confirm it works with 256gb microSD cards, so the 32gb limitation in the tech specs is just the exfat crap.
It's not about price, but rather about specs. I find no reason to get such a powerful processor when I'm mostly fine with the current performance on the Jolla, and would rather prefer to have a measly processor that sips battery life even when in use (since I usually disable suspend-on-screen-off and "run stuff" on the phone).
Obviously, if they managed to put a largeish processor and still keep decent battery life, then I have nothing to say...
The Jolla C seemed interesting because of the weaker processor in raw numbers, but it doesn't seem the battery life improves much...
However,
A) I would still need a primary phone,
B) I am still unsure of the business model behind ports.
And by the way, I got the Jolla C and yeah, it has neither a compass nor a gyroscope. Can't find a difference in performance compared to Sbj, and the kernel is pretty old too -- 3.10. Quite unimpressed so far.
Not worth losing the hwkb at all, at least for me.
Will try to use it for a day to evaluate sunlight screen readability and battery life.
I can also confirm it works with 256gb microSD cards, so the 32gb limitation in the tech specs is just the exfat crap.
Jolla C battery life so far has been excellent compared to the Jolla phone.
Performance wise, it's been a great improvement too. It is much snappier.
