sulu | # 3241 | 2016-09-13, 21:33 | Report

Just a request, not a demand:
If you create images based on mine, could you please NOT put "sulu" in the file name?

I've had some requests for help with "my" images, but since I usually don't try other images I don't really know what's going on there.
If YOU create an image, then it is YOU who deserves the credit (and needs to take the blame ). So people should first turn to you if they need help.
I'll happily help out if I can, but I don't like to stand in the first line in these cases.

Thanks!

t-b | # 3242 | 2016-09-14, 15:22 | Report

I certainly don't think I contributed enough to call it mine, but it is fine by me to rename it. I haven't seen any posts about problems or questions about the image. I can only assume it is working without issues then...

Will remove the mediafire link this weekend so there is only one 'official' link to the file from qole.

baranovskiykonstantin | # 3243 | 2016-10-04, 05:33 | Report

What is the passwords for user and root in debian_jessie2sulu_armhf.img?

sulu | # 3244 | 2016-10-04, 13:37 | Report

If t-b didn't change the passwords, then they should be "user" and "root".

baranovskiykonstantin | # 3245 | 2016-10-05, 03:53 | Report

I tried to use them. They are not correct.

t-b | # 3246 | 2016-10-05, 15:43 | Report

As far as I know I haven't changed any passwords - because I didn't need them. I used debian chroot for root access (no pw needed) and also user can be accessed without pw.

Can't test right now due to a recent re-install.

baranovskiykonstantin | # 3247 | 2016-10-05, 16:51 | Report

It happens when I use terminal from lxde session. When debian chroot are used password not needed, it is true.

P.S.

Ok,user just not setup. Password must be set with
from debian chroot and to add it to sudoers with

---

Last edited by baranovskiykonstantin; 2016-10-06 at 03:52.

Malakai | # 3248 | 2016-11-06, 13:35 | Report

Hello,

First of all I would like to say thanks for the images and the effort put in this.

I have a little problem coming from my side and I would need a little bit of help.

I already used Easy Debian on my previous N900 without any real issue, but today I tried to set it up on my second N900 on which I have made some significant changes.
So I will detail here the changes I made on my second N900 (and are related somehow to Easy Debian) and the error message I get when I try to launch an image.

First the error is :

So apparently a problem with su.

The changes I've made to the second N900 (basically I wanted for the root password to be required for becoming root) :

I also had to change /etc/sudoers.d/chroot.sudoers from
to

so that the root password is required when using su (or root) command, but even without changing the chroot.sudoers file it still gives the error.

How can I correct this without giving away the security put in place (root password required to become root)?
Should I put something else in /etc/sudoers.d/chroot.sudoers?

t-b | # 3249 | 2016-11-06, 20:11 | Report

I've got the same error after installing a back-up image (created with BackupMenu) on a 2nd N900 I am using.
Everything works fine except Easy Debian. Not sure if it is a "su problem", the "Exec format error" part of the error seems to point to a kernel incompatibility.

Haven't had a lot of time to investigate the problem and interested in a solution as well.

sulu | # 3250 | 2016-11-07, 19:06 | Report

Are your N900s running kernel power? The armhf images need it.