![]() |
2008-05-10
, 20:39
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#12
|
![]() |
2008-05-10
, 20:54
|
Posts: 566 |
Thanked: 150 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#13
|
![]() |
2008-05-10
, 21:09
|
|
Posts: 4,930 |
Thanked: 2,272 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
|
#14
|
![]() |
2008-05-11
, 07:03
|
|
Posts: 4,384 |
Thanked: 5,524 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
@ ˙ǝɹǝɥʍou
|
#15
|
![]() |
2008-05-11
, 07:29
|
|
Posts: 87 |
Thanked: 45 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
|
#16
|
![]() |
2008-05-11
, 08:37
|
Posts: 566 |
Thanked: 150 times |
Joined on Dec 2007
|
#17
|
You haven't seen people commenting on how hard it is to read text/watch videos on the N800? Or about x86 compatibility? (The latter, particularly. I know of no x86 compatible pocketable devices.)
I really don't see how these are worse for "real work" than the eee unless real work is defined in some wierd fashion. If your work requires a lot of typing, you'd get an external, full-pitch keyboard either way. If it doesn't, you'll take an incremental performance hit from the on-screen rather than sub-pitch keyboard input, but you'll be productive either way.
![]() |
2008-05-11
, 09:38
|
Posts: 118 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
|
#18
|
Zaurus, maybe, but they are expensive...
You could just get an N810 online.
![]() |
2008-05-11
, 11:24
|
Posts: 874 |
Thanked: 316 times |
Joined on Jun 2007
@ London UK
|
#19
|
But the usual complaint about MIDs: They're not really that pocketable.
Zaurus is no match for N810. Go to the Zaurus forums, they are still comparing the Z to the 770. N810 is way more advanced.
![]() |
2008-05-11
, 13:01
|
Posts: 1,513 |
Thanked: 2,248 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
@ US
|
#20
|
1. it has a full keyboard and familiar design.
2. while not pocketable, its quite "bag-able" without adding noticable weight and bulk. didnt toughtfix manage to fit it in a A5 "map pouch"?