|
|
2008-07-22
, 10:27
|
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#41
|
|
|
2008-07-22
, 12:41
|
|
Posts: 1,097 |
Thanked: 650 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#42
|
|
|
2008-07-23
, 00:20
|
|
Posts: 30 |
Thanked: 66 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
|
#43
|
How are you qualified to determine whether my claims that the packaging is bad are "erroneous"? Do you actually know what might constitute a bad package?
| The Following User Says Thank You to Pebby For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2008-07-23
, 04:09
|
|
Posts: 68 |
Thanked: 18 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#44
|
Gizmo allows Video conferencing or Video chat as I call it , on the ITT. Am I wrong ?
|
|
2008-07-23
, 04:22
|
|
Posts: 68 |
Thanked: 18 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#45
|
No, but you clearly are qualified and do know. I say this without malice: if you have knowledge, share it. Instead of walking into a room full of toddlers and proclaiming, "idiots, don't you know you can walk," then promptly leaving, with the toddlers staring at you, wondering how to walk, you could show them how to do it. Why not elaborate instead of saying "oh, this looks terrible, I'm not getting involved," especially when there are people in this thread who are trying to help each other? That leads to things getting fixed the right way and everyone learning more, instead of only one person (you) knowing the right way, and everyone else being scolded without learning a thing.
This is a community.
|
|
2008-07-23
, 05:58
|
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#46
|
Did I ever negate your point about it being a bad package ? Read the lines instead of reading your own distorted viewpont... trust me it will feel refreshing to actually understand what someone says.
No, but you clearly are qualified and do know. I say this without malice: if you have knowledge, share it. Instead of walking into a room full of toddlers and proclaiming, "idiots, don't you know you can walk," then promptly leaving, with the toddlers staring at you, wondering how to walk, you could show them how to do it. Why not elaborate instead of saying "oh, this looks terrible, I'm not getting involved," especially when there are people in this thread who are trying to help each other? That leads to things getting fixed the right way and everyone learning more, instead of only one person (you) knowing the right way, and everyone else being scolded without learning a thing.
I certainly can't fix their broken package for them.
| The Following User Says Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
2008-07-23
, 07:05
|
|
|
Posts: 4,274 |
Thanked: 5,358 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Looking at y'all and sighing
|
#47
|
If the next screen appears, click OK

|
|
2008-07-23
, 10:35
|
|
Posts: 17 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
|
#48
|
|
|
2008-07-23
, 15:47
|
|
Posts: 1,097 |
Thanked: 650 times |
Joined on Nov 2007
|
#49
|
Probably what I get from browsing with the N800 in bed right after waking up. My apologies.

|
|
2008-07-23
, 16:48
|
|
Posts: 30 |
Thanked: 66 times |
Joined on Jun 2008
|
#50
|
...elaborating on exactly how broken their package is and exactly how much pain and suffering it has the potential to cause their users...
We're not all linux gurus (hey, someone even asked what symlinking was in this thread, while some of us [cough-me-cough] are just mad the n810 didn't come pre-installed with GCC and make), but a lot of folks here see the Application Manager as a purdy interface equivalent to a website for magically getting software, with any additional steps 'just linux baggage along the way' - it is good to teach good practices, and why bad practices are bad, since the idea of this device is that we can all be contributors. Who knows who here may want to repository-fy a project some day? The more everyone here understands, the more likely they are to make good choices and create in the future.