|
2006-07-08
, 10:11
|
Posts: 17 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Dec 2005
|
#2
|
|
2006-08-18
, 02:23
|
Posts: 14 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Aug 2006
|
#3
|
|
2006-08-18
, 02:25
|
|
Posts: 207 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ Texas
|
#4
|
I'm look for a Java Virtual Machine for OS2006. jamvm worked well on OS2005... Has anything been prepared for 2006?
-F
|
2006-08-18
, 12:56
|
|
Posts: 1,463 |
Thanked: 81 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ UK
|
#5
|
|
2006-08-26
, 14:13
|
Posts: 155 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Nov 2005
@ central georgia, usa
|
#6
|
|
2006-08-26
, 21:18
|
|
Posts: 38 |
Thanked: 10 times |
Joined on Mar 2006
|
#7
|
|
2006-08-27
, 00:07
|
|
Posts: 207 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Jun 2006
@ Texas
|
#8
|
Based-on the link here:
http://focus.ti.com/general/docs/wtb...data/omap_1710
The chip has Java acceleration also...
1) Nokia programmers/engineers don't know how to add it.
2) No room in the flash memory.
3) There was a huge snowstorm in Nokia last winter and it delayed development--something had to go, Java.
|
2006-08-27
, 00:13
|
|
Posts: 1,463 |
Thanked: 81 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ UK
|
#9
|
4) ARM/Sun require large licence fees to use the Jazelle extensions, which Nokia deemed to not have sufficient ROI.I'm putting my money on (4)... however using Jazelle we could get some really good Java performance - possibly good enough for us third party devs to ship Java applications for end users.
|
2006-08-27
, 01:17
|
Posts: 503 |
Thanked: 267 times |
Joined on Jul 2006
@ Helsinki
|
#10
|
5) Maybe they just don't have spare developers to work on adding Java support to Nokia 770 and are working to improve some other more important things
-F