|
|
2009-02-27
, 00:56
|
|
|
Posts: 480 |
Thanked: 378 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
@ Chicago-ish
|
#12
|

|
|
2009-02-27
, 07:32
|
|
|
Posts: 4,274 |
Thanked: 5,358 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
@ Looking at y'all and sighing
|
#13
|
mikkov:
Yes, I have confirmed that it is possible to use 'py2deb' even on binary packages like 'graphviz', but I will certainly investigate the possibility (as you suggest) of doing it a more 'normal' way. However, I will need to wrap my heard around the concept of packaging the *binaries* that I have compiled, and not the *source* of the app itself. Will this just all 'fall into place' if I go down that road?
|
|
2009-02-27
, 09:43
|
|
Posts: 1,224 |
Thanked: 1,763 times |
Joined on Jul 2007
|
#14
|
|
|
2009-02-27
, 14:33
|
|
|
Posts: 273 |
Thanked: 104 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Manitoba, Canada
|
#15
|
Yes, I have confirmed that it is possible to use 'py2deb' even on binary packages like 'graphviz', but I will certainly investigate the possibility (as you suggest) of doing it a more 'normal' way. However, I will need to wrap my heard around the concept of packaging the *binaries* that I have compiled, and not the *source* of the app itself. Will this just all 'fall into place' if I go down that road?
There is nothing more dangerous than a bored cat.