Menu

Main Menu
Talk Get Daily Search

Member's Online

    User Name
    Password

    Screw the new N800, i want the iPhone

    Reply
    Page 5 of 7 | Prev |   3     4   5   6     7   | Next
    Milhouse | # 41 | 2007-01-12, 06:37 | Report

    Considering Apple expect to flog 10 million of these iPhones, I wouldn't call it a niche product!

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    freeman | # 42 | 2007-01-12, 07:36 | Report

    I don't get it, why did you guys go gaga about the Apple iphone, just because it made by Apple? A lock down phone. Common, FIC Neo 1973 look even better in spec. http://linuxdevices.com/news/NS2986976174.html
    For $350, it will be more like a 770 w/ smaller screen, but bigger than iPhone a.k.a. VGA resolution
    linux kernel 2.6.17
    64MB Flash, 128MB RAM
    GPS and Quad GSM
    Although no BT/Wifi, but the upgrade model will be.
    when plug into the USB, it have network emu.
    It has OpenMoKo project similar to Maemo project.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    aflegg | # 43 | 2007-01-12, 09:06 | Report

    What makes the iPhone stand out is the UI. Neither OpenMoKo/FIC or Maemo/N800 come anywhere near the level of thought that has gone into the iPhone's UI.

    It's just a shame it's a locked down, overly expensive, restrictive piece of kit.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    freeman | # 44 | 2007-01-12, 09:14 | Report

    Originally Posted by aflegg View Post
    What makes the iPhone stand out is the UI. Neither OpenMoKo/FIC or Maemo/N800 come anywhere near the level of thought that has gone into the iPhone's UI.

    It's just a shame it's a locked down, overly expensive, restrictive piece of kit.
    And that make it impossible for somebody to make a skin/shell on the OpenMoKo?
    What worse is, that most people haven't even touch neither the FIC Neo phone or Apple iPhone yet, and they already made their conclusion that the Apple is better. I'll give a benefit of the doubt that Apple OSX is slick, but that doesn't neccessary mean it will be the same experience on the iPhone, nor there could be a better UI made by other phone company.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    aflegg | # 45 | 2007-01-12, 09:33 | Report

    freeman,

    It's not just a skin or shell, it's the level of thought that's gone into producing an easy to use, visually appealing, consistent, integrated interface (from the videos, anyway).

    If/when someone produces videos showing the same or higher level of eye candy, integrated interface and powerful UI on the OpenMoKo, people will get excited over that too[1].

    Apple have raised the bar, to say otherwise is disingenuous.

    Cheers,

    Andrew

    [1] Although less so: FIC's a smaller company than Apple - but Apple have worked hard to get the reputation and hype they now get. FIC can't expect the same level of media exposure having just started.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    soundwave106 | # 46 | 2007-01-12, 14:26 | Report

    Originally Posted by Milhouse View Post
    Considering Apple expect to flog 10 million of these iPhones, I wouldn't call it a niche product!
    That's Steve Jobs' sales persuasion for ya. IMHO Apple's dreaming right now, given the price and competition. Though it certainly might follow the iPod path and become big later.

    The clincher's gonna be the UI. It *has* to be good. If it sucks, folks are going to stick to the Sidekicks and Blackberries. I don't think its a good idea to comment on a UI, personally, before it is released. The Blackberry UI is pretty good from what I know, but really optimized for business. OTOH what I've heard of the Sidekick UI suggests it kind of lacks.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    tabletfan | # 47 | 2007-01-12, 16:21 | Report

    The NYTimes tech editor has some hands-on information:

    http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/0...th-the-iphone/

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Texrat | # 48 | 2007-01-12, 16:25 | Report

    Originally Posted by shrimp_was_disabled2 View Post
    I like the part where you attack me personally instead of actually making a real arguement.

    But anyways ... thanks I guess. See you around.
    Attack? Not in my post. Just an observation, shrimp, and the bulk of it left untyped. I was actually fishing for a paranoid response, and it looks like I had the right bait.


    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Texrat | # 49 | 2007-01-12, 16:27 | Report

    Originally Posted by konfoo View Post
    Wow, the schoolyard bickering really ruined this thread. But we are on the intarweb, so shout away I guess!
    Well, the internet IS Serious Business.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Reggie | # 50 | 2007-01-12, 16:33 | Report

    Guys, personal attacks have no place here in iTT. The forum has a private messaging system. Take them offline.

    Thanks.

    Edit | Forward | Quote | Quick Reply | Thanks

     
    Page 5 of 7 | Prev |   3     4   5   6     7   | Next
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Normal Logout