Poll: What is your exposure to Linux outside of the NIT?
Poll Options
What is your exposure to Linux outside of the NIT?

Reply
Thread Tools
lcuk's Avatar
Posts: 1,635 | Thanked: 1,816 times | Joined on Apr 2008 @ Manchester, England
#51
Originally Posted by luca View Post
The problem with a binary blob is that it may work at a point in time, then the environment moves forward and the blob doesn't work anymore.
Nvidia didn't pull a "fixed in fremantle" yet , but one never knows....
given a choice between working now and for as long as maintained vs not at all I know which I would choose.
__________________
liqbase sketching the future.
like what i say? hit the Thanks, thanks!
twitter.com/lcuk
 

The Following User Says Thank You to lcuk For This Useful Post:
luca's Avatar
Posts: 1,137 | Thanked: 402 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ Catalunya
#52
Originally Posted by lcuk View Post
given a choice between working now and for as long as maintained vs not at all I know which I would choose.
Oh, sure, but given a choice between a piece of hardware working with a binary blob and one working with a GPL driver, preferably in the mainline kernel/X, I also know which I would choose.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to luca For This Useful Post:
lcuk's Avatar
Posts: 1,635 | Thanked: 1,816 times | Joined on Apr 2008 @ Manchester, England
#53
Originally Posted by luca View Post
Oh, sure, but given a choice between a piece of hardware working with a binary blob and one working with a GPL driver, preferably in the mainline kernel/X, I also know which I would choose.
as a lazy sysadmin, there is one thing i prefer more than GPL drivers:

binary blobs created from GPL drivers
__________________
liqbase sketching the future.
like what i say? hit the Thanks, thanks!
twitter.com/lcuk
 

The Following User Says Thank You to lcuk For This Useful Post:
luca's Avatar
Posts: 1,137 | Thanked: 402 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ Catalunya
#54
Originally Posted by lcuk View Post
as a lazy sysadmin, there is one thing i prefer more than GPL drivers:

binary blobs created from GPL drivers
My distro already provides those, either included in one the binary kernel packages or as dkms packages.
 
daperl's Avatar
Posts: 2,427 | Thanked: 2,986 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#55
Originally Posted by luca View Post
Oh, sure, but given a choice between a piece of hardware working with a binary blob and one working with a GPL driver, preferably in the mainline kernel/X, I also know which I would choose.
I don't think anyone is arguing against this. The problem is everything else isn't even close to being equal. I would jump ship yesterday, but even companies like Via and the guys that create the OMAP3 graphics chips aren't sharing. I never need the latest and greatest, so when there are FOSS AMD (or whoever) drivers coupled with hardware that meet my minimum requirements (robust, fast, ..., etc.), I'll be there. But in the meantime...
__________________
N9: Go white or go home
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to daperl For This Useful Post:
Posts: 2 | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on Jul 2009
#56
Run a mix of Linux, Windows and Mac with Linux being the predominate OS.
 
luca's Avatar
Posts: 1,137 | Thanked: 402 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ Catalunya
#57
Originally Posted by daperl View Post
I would jump ship yesterday, but even companies like Via and the guys that create the OMAP3 graphics chips aren't sharing.
Given the choice to screw them or let them screw you....
 
deadmalc's Avatar
Posts: 415 | Thanked: 182 times | Joined on Nov 2007 @ Leeds UK
#58
Originally Posted by qwerty12 View Post
Yep, guess I'm not alone in sharing that sentiment...
I switched it off (and set up interfaces, wpasupplicant.conf etc manually), but Firefox believed my connection was non-existent and set itself to "Work Offline" by default, on each startup. It was a pain in the *** turning it off. (I think there's workarounds/fixes now, but they didn't exist when I was using Linux.)

Or maybe it's Ubuntu turning more and more into a shitpile. I had to upgrade from an older Ubuntu install that had an old NetworkManager and pin networkmanager in /etc/apt/preferences. Too much of a hassle if I needed to reinstall. Plus, I couldn't mount jffs2 files like I could with previous versions (I had to boot from a 7.04 live CD and tar it up from there...)
Whilst I cringe at the thought of using network manager on a server, using it on a desktop my experiences are ok. As far as using a laptop (wifi on the move etc) it works really well - well enough for my better half to connect to a wifi spot without any problems, and start a openvpn client.

As far as pulseaudio goes, I don't know of any other software that allows you to specify different mixer levels for different applications so easily (and I agree it's far from perfect, just try using skype with pulseaudio for the microphone!)

I think with a lot of these new ideas, you have to bear with them and see what happens.

And just be thankful linux has a good networking stack, and you are not left in the world of windows networking!
Nothing beats the vi approach, but not all people share my sentiment of pain ;-)
__________________
Life on the edge....always waiting to fall
 
Posts: 10 | Thanked: 3 times | Joined on Jul 2009
#59
im a mainly windows user just never had the chance to use linux.
 
johnkzin's Avatar
Posts: 1,878 | Thanked: 646 times | Joined on Sep 2007 @ San Jose, CA
#60
None of the above.

Mac and Linux (not quite equal, but sort of).

No Windows anywhere (I have self respect and STANDARDS).
__________________
My Personal Blog
 
Reply

Thread Tools

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 14:28.